Jump to content

BREAKING NEWS ! Boris Johnson to resign as Prime Minister


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Fortunately we haven’t had a Liebour PM for about 17 years. There’s very little else to compare with other than war criminal Blair’s massive lies. Smarmy Starmer hasn’t had much opportunity to  show his deceit yet, although his sanctimonious performance over partygate while presiding over beergate is rank hypocrisy. 

More diversion. No attempt to address the actions and lies of Johnson.

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, RayC said:

More diversion. No attempt to address the actions and lies of Johnson.

Mere fibs about nothing important. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Mere fibs about nothing important. 

Like being a Russian asset. That's quite important. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Just accept the result and move on?  It’s only two days after these policing double standards are exposed and you want to quickly brush them under the carpet. 
That’s rich, coming from a group who have still not accepted the Brexit referendum result after six years. 

No double standards. Just your man breaking the law and Starmer not breaking the law. Just cccept the result and move on. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

This just came up on my YouTube page.

I don't know the guy. But it seems he has the perfect words to describe the situation. Enjoy!

 

About the only thing missing is a Sky News logo in the corner of the screen!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, baboon said:

Like being a Russian asset. That's quite important. 

Whatever that is, it must mean something in your world. In the real UK it’s either untrue or not important. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, baboon said:

Under different lockdown rules.

Away with you and your knowingly false equivalences. Just accept the result and move on.

Boris had already been vaccinated and although the laws were across the board for everyone , those laws were relaxed when everyone else had been vaccinated .

   So, Boris wouldn't have broken any laws if everyone else had been vaccinated and the rules devalued (?)

Posted
14 minutes ago, baboon said:

No double standards. Just your man breaking the law and Starmer not breaking the law. Just cccept the result and move on. 

 

 

Move along, nothing to see here??

Starmer did break the law. Didn’t you see the video? Is there on of Boris at a booze up?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Whatever that is, it must mean something in your world. In the real UK it’s either untrue or not important. 

It means your man broke away from his security detail and partied with the KGB. And recently gave a peerage to his son against the advice of the security services.

Go on, pass that off as unimportant because you sure as hell can't deny it happened and retain any credibility. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Move along, nothing to see here??

Starmer did break the law. Didn’t you see the video? Is there on of Boris at a booze up?

No he didn't. You're a liar.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Boris had already been vaccinated and although the laws were across the board for everyone ,

he broke them and lied repeatedly about the fact.

Edited by baboon
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, baboon said:

No he didn't. You're a liar.

 

4 minutes ago, baboon said:

he broke them and lied repeatedly about the fact.

It would make for a more intelligent discussion , if we could stop calling people liars .

   "But they did tell lies"...........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted
8 minutes ago, baboon said:

It means your man broke away from his security detail and partied with the KGB. And recently gave a peerage to his son against the advice of the security services.

Go on, pass that off as unimportant because you sure as hell can't deny it happened and retain any credibility. 

So you think Boris is a spy now???????

Too many looney tunes or looney juice for you. No credibility at all in that report, wherever you dug it up from. Definitely in the not important box. 

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, baboon said:

No he didn't. You're a liar.

Starmer got away with it and Boris didn't .

Starmers  food and drinks party was considered to be necessary for work, whilst Borises food and drink party were considered to be unnecessary for work .

   The people who made those marginal judgements could have been biased in giving one the benefit of doubt and not the other one 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, baboon said:

It means your man broke away from his security detail and partied with the KGB.

I don't believe that is true . 

Could you provide some evidence of that ?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I don't believe that is true . 

Could you provide some evidence of that ?

We’ll probably find that Starmer said so. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Loiner said:

The video shows that Starmer is the liar here. Angel also. 

He is innocent. Your man is guilty. 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

 

It would make for a more intelligent discussion , if we could stop calling people liars .

   "But they did tell lies"...........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I will stop calling you a liar when you stop telling lies.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, baboon said:

He is innocent. Your man is guilty. 

You can judge however you want. We have seen the video. Starmer is lying and was breaking the rules. 
Just like you claim Boris was. They are all the same. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Loiner said:

You can judge however you want. We have seen the video. Starmer is lying and was breaking the rules. 
Just like you claim Boris was. They are all the same. 

No they aren't. That's why you give that lying corrupt Johonson a free pass no matter what, but tear into Starmer despite him doing nothing wrong.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Loiner said:

There won't be many members of the British public standing outside those gates. They wouldn't get through the massed MSM hacks baying for Boris's blood.

Loiner, what do you think of Johnson, as Foreign Secretary, flying straight from a Nato conference to a party in Italy to meet Lebedev without any Foreign Office officials present?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/06/johnson-admits-to-private-meeting-with-ex-kgb-agent

 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Loiner said:

More anti-Boris MSM hysteria. Doesn’t actually make anything true, or important. 

But it is true, making you even more of a fool. He even admitted it himself.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

His point was highlight the E.U rules and restrictions 

I know. The issue is why didn't he choose a true example of a rule which was significantly and negatively affecting UK, rather than lying about banana regulations.

I have some ideas about it.....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...