Jump to content

POLITICS Trump says FBI raiding his Mar-a-Lago home


Scott

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

What accusation have I made ?

You're amplifying what McCarthy said which is tantamount to stating that as your own opinion. Otherwise what point were you making? We all know that McCarthy said it was political. Nowhere has he said he was just wanting to make sure the rules were followed (missing link form you) and he has said he will seek revenge if the GOP take the house in November.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2022 at 7:10 PM, LarrySR said:

Trump has already called on his base to “protest like they never seen before” if he is indicted. 
A sudden increase is security presence at the court houses in NY, GA or DC will indicate the arrest is imminent. 
 

 

Why don't you tell the truth? He has called on people to protest if the Feds to anything illegal!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Berkshire said:

It's not that Trump lies more than any other President...or even politician.  It's that Trump lies more than any human being who's ever walked the Earth. 

With that comment, you fall right in with them then.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, habanero said:

Why don't you tell the truth? He has called on people to protest if the Feds to anything illegal!

Where did he say "If"? Link please.

 

Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday suggested the Federal Bureau of Investigation may have "planted" evidence against him during a search at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Monday.

In an angry rant planted on Truth Social, Trump cast aspersions at the FBI for executing a search warrant on his property.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/fbi-trump/

Edited by ozimoron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2022 at 8:17 AM, JonnyF said:

Wow. State sponsored raids on the homes of political rivals?

 

The USA is looking more and more like a third world banana republic every day.

Was ir really/actually 'state sponsored' or was it a result of someone (a clown) breaking a serious law and the appropriate authority doing their assigned job according to the law?

 

Seems to me very clearly that it was the later.

Edited by scorecard
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

You're amplifying what McCarthy said which is tantamount to stating that as your own opinion. Otherwise what point were you making? We all know that McCarthy said it was political. Nowhere has he said he was just wanting to make sure the rules were followed (missing link form you) and he has said he will seek revenge if the GOP take the house in November.

He will investigate the raid on Trump , to make sure it wasn't Political and everything was in order .

   Stands to reason doesn't it ?

If he investigates and everything is in order , then there's no more action to be taken .

  Ans BTW , saying what other people have said , doesn't mean I think the same as they do .

   McCarthy has an opinion and I stated his opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donald Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment and wouldn’t answer questions under oath in the New York attorney general’s long-running civil investigation into his business dealings, the former president said in a statement Wednesday.

 

“I once asked, ‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?’ Now I know the answer to that question,” the statement said.

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ny-investigation-testimony-a4e6264d44b194d24dfb916ffc7f51ca

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

C

Feb. 2022

Trump improperly took away classified material, National Archives says. Archives says it has alerted Department of Justice about former president’s removal of files from White House.

What was the outcome of that ?

 

"The National Archives did not 'find' anything, they were given, upon request, presidential records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act," Trump said in a written statement.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-took-classified-material-white-house-florida-national-archives-says-2022-02-18/

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Donald Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment and wouldn’t answer questions under oath in the New York attorney general’s long-running civil investigation into his business dealings, the former president said in a statement Wednesday.

 

“I once asked, ‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?’ Now I know the answer to that question,” the statement said.

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ny-investigation-testimony-a4e6264d44b194d24dfb916ffc7f51ca

oho , how many in Hillary case connected took the fifth amendment also ? ,......Now something comes biting you .....????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

What was the outcome of that ?

 

"The National Archives did not 'find' anything, they were given, upon request, presidential records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act," Trump said in a written statement.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-took-classified-material-white-house-florida-national-archives-says-2022-02-18/

...said Donald Trump.  Laughably poor on two counts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

What was the outcome of that ?

 

"The National Archives did not 'find' anything, they were given, upon request, presidential records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act," Trump said in a written statement.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-took-classified-material-white-house-florida-national-archives-says-2022-02-18/

That was back in February. If it was true then why did young Eric tell the press they were still in negotiations at the current time. It doesn't take months to hand over requested records which he was legally compelled to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

What was the outcome of that ?

 

"The National Archives did not 'find' anything, they were given, upon request, presidential records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act," Trump said in a written statement.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-took-classified-material-white-house-florida-national-archives-says-2022-02-18/

Outcome? FBI raid yesterday with boxes taken away for examination

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, david555 said:

oho , how many in Hillary case connected took the fifth amendment also ? ,......Now something comes biting you .....????

Ooh!  Interesting. 

Do tell. 

(The truth though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Slip said:

Ooh!  Interesting. 

Do tell. 

(The truth though).

The whole story ...? to long to tell , specially the smashing phones instead of deliver them for investigating ..... come on you sure know it all ....????

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, david555 said:

The whole story ...? to long to tell , specially the smashing phones instead of deliver them for investigating ..... come on you sure know it all ....????

Is this about Trump? You're not engaging in off topic whataboutery are you?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we please start calling the USA just SA? Nothing United about it at all. Ah that might annoy South Africa. I'll ask some word specialists for alternatives.

 

Trump knows specialists. He has the best specialists. Some of the most bigly specialists ever.

 

COVFEFE

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Is this about Trump? You're not engaging in off topic whataboutery are you?

I knew that comment would come as it came inconvenient for you ???? , but the similarity's are there and the  not equal judging handling ....

 

O.K. i made the hitting  point and go now backstage again .....???? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, david555 said:

The whole story ...? to long to tell , specially the smashing phones instead of deliver them for investigating ..... come on you sure know it all ....????

I would be happy with the answer to how many took the 5th regarding cases regarding Hillary Clinton.  (I'm easily pleased).  So looking forward to your answer by return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Slip said:

I would be happy with the answer to how many took the 5th regarding cases regarding Hillary Clinton.  (I'm easily pleased).  So looking forward to your answer by return.

As a European i did not even remember their names , but i saw the investigating commission on tv , and was surprised so many just blatant said the lines  ".....taking the  5 th amendment "   

 You know it very well  they did , or else just go to Wikipedia ...????

Edited by david555
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, david555 said:

I knew that comment would come as it came inconvenient for you ???? , but the similarity's are there and the  not equal judging handling ....

 

O.K. i made the hitting  point and go now backstage again .....???? 

I would have happily responded but you broke the rules of the forum in order to troll me as you just confessed to doing.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

I would have happily responded but you broke the rules of the forum in order to troll me as you just confessed to doing.

?????   oh ....the trolling excuse if not agreed ....i see ????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, david555 said:

As a European i did not even remember their names , but i saw the investigating commission on tv , and was surprised so many just blatant said the lines  ".....taking the  5 th amendment "   

 You know it very well  they did , or else just go to Wikipedia ...????

So nothing at all.  I can't believe someone just accused you of being a troll.  Bye.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ozimoron said:

The following morning, the billionaire Trump sent out emails asking for money.

“I need every single red-blooded American Patriot to step up during this time,” read the email. “Please rush in a donation IMMEDIATELY to publicly stand with me against this NEVERENDING WITCH HUNT.”

 

https://nordot.app/929783457074577408?c=592622757532812385

"Patriot funds for the master promoter". You don't know where they are going, or how the money is going to be used, but trust him. 

 

For a self proclaimed multi billionaire, he sure seems unable or reluctant to use his own funds for anything political. Does self entitled come to mind? 

Edited by spidermike007
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Most likely he will be eventually indicted for one or more charges by the DOJ and or Georgia. I doubt the DOJ will act before the midterms. I have learned though that if convicted he will probably just get home incarceration because of the  need for secret service protection. So no more golf and no more rallies. The poor dear.

You are likely correct. I doubt they would seek jail time for an ex prez. It would be precedent setting, and it would be absolutely lovely to see. But, I doubt it will happen. Unfortunately. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...