Jump to content

Enoch Powell, he wasnt wrong in his forecast !


CharlieH

Recommended Posts


23 hours ago, proton said:

I asked a black lesbian activist in the 80's how she defined racism (they almost never can) she said- it's what ever we say it is! ....

Hmmm... OK. If you say so.

 

23 hours ago, transam said:

Absolute, fact....

Oh, so you were there @transam when @proton had this epiphany?

 

That was indeed either a remarkable coincidence or an amazing stroke of luck, eh?

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

and he was wrong about Australia and NZ too if he included them. He was right about Africa, lol.

Would you be in favour of immigration rules for Australia that allowed 2 500 000 000  people to go and live in Australia as Australian Citizens with visas or anything  ? Two and a half billion people 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yes the old black lesbian gambit.

Either it didn't happen or it's irrelevant to proving any point what one person says as if one person could possibly represents all of any group.

So basically a cheap debate trick.

Yup, it's right up there with their, "Some of my best friends are black lesbians" defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Are racists somehow not scum?

Its a matter of degree in my opinion

as a member of a lynch mob yes

as a concerned politician seeking an effective immigration policy then no

Edited by Bday Prang
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Would you be in favour of immigration rules for Australia that allowed 2 500 000 000  people to go and live in Australia as Australian Citizens with visas or anything  ? Two and a half billion people 

I have already said I don't favour unrestricted immigration. Three times now with this post. What I am in favour of is giving all refugee claims a fair hearing as required by international law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Not by me and it as directed at me. Maybe I missed something, could you explain why you think that?

It was humour remark to Mr Puddle, regrettably you seem unable and cannot grasp the complex meaning of a word thrown around like coffeti at people with an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, proton said:
13 hours ago, placeholder said:

Oh, is that what it implied? Out of all the classical quotations he could have cited, and being a classical scholar there were so many open to him, he chose that one? 

So you never read it then and just made up the 1991 part and really want to believe he meant actual butchery in the streets? Well, if you look at the list of stabbings in London alone this year perhaps that is not too far off.

So your almost convinced that he was predicting the future rather than spouting the illusory, self-serving rhetoric of a decorated* but otherwise untalented politician?

 

* that OK @transam?

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kwasaki said:

It was humour remark to Mr Puddle, regrettably you seem unable and cannot grasp the complex meaning of a word thrown around like coffeti at people with an opinion.

There's no humour in racism. There is no racist joke which is anything other than toxic.

  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ozimoron said:

I have already said I don't favour unrestricted immigration. Three times now with this post. What I am in favour of is giving all refugee claims a fair hearing as required by international law.

We aren't talking about refugees though , 

That's a different subject .

OK, Enoch Powell was opposed to unrestricted immigration into the U.K and you agree with him on that point . His concern was that millions of foreigners would go and live in the UK and British people would become the minority .

    So you agree with him that immigration needs to be restricted 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

We aren't talking about refugees though , 

That's a different subject .

OK, Enoch Powell was opposed to unrestricted immigration into the U.K and you agree with him on that point . His concern was that millions of foreigners would go and live in the UK and British people would become the minority .

    So you agree with him that immigration needs to be restricted 

Not for that reason. I have now said 4 times that immigration should be restricted. The only reason is because of economic disruption, orderly immigration is fine.

 

Powell made overtly racist remarks which drown out any other conversation he may have wanted to have. He is rightly vilified by all right thinking people because of it. Flashes of reason don't redeem racists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

There's no humour in racism. There is no racist joke which is anything other than toxic.

But many jokes that mention race are not racist or toxic  to anybody except people like you

There is humour in everything even death  buy you need a sense of humour to appreciate that

Edited by Bday Prang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Not for that reason. I have now said 4 times that immigration should be restricted. The only reason is because of economic disruption, orderly immigration is fine.

 

Powell made overtly racist remarks which drown out any other conversation he may have wanted to have. He is rightly vilified by all right thinking people because of it. Flashes of reason don't redeem racists.

Was your Father a racist ?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:
1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

I read that as well! Shocking.

 

Daily Mail wasn't it? Or the Express?

Its a fact .doesn't matter who says it 

At the risk of some getting their panties in a bunch about being off topic, didn't a certain White House advisor introduce the greater unwashed to the perfectly acceptable (to them) concept of "alternative facts"?

 

At least you're nailing your editorial colours to the mast here and not like that other chap who keeps carping on about terrible stuff he's reading in "the papers"?

 

Well, sort of.

Edited by NanLaew
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

At the risk of some getting their panties in a bunch about being off topic, didn't a certain White House advisor introduce the greater unwashed to the perfectly acceptable (to them) concept of "alternative facts"?

 

At least you're nailing your editorial colours to the mast here and not like that other chap who keeps carping on about terrible stuff he's reading in "the papers"?

Do stop going on about Trump .

Do try and stay on topic 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Pointless discussing anything with someone who is confused about being a racist and doesn't like his own country....????

I love my country. I'm a patriot. I don't have to love every crime that racists committed to love my country. I demonstrate my patriotism by being honest about the past. I honor the good and vilify the evil.

 

If Powell was alive today and lived in Australia he would be in jail under our laws.

 

 

Edited by ozimoron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

That is one of the problems with discussions these days .

Talking about a person being interviewed and his opinion and some people just give abuse and accuse you of loving him and being a dinosaur etc 

    I blame the general dumbing down of society and also the left and the right each going into their own corner and yelling abuse at each other and not any room in the middle

The fact that there is no middle ground these days and political parties of many nations have allowed themselves to be browbeaten, railroaded and hogwashed by their own extremists is a valid view which I share 100%

 

However, in this instance, you (we) are off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Another Google search that fails to propagate the illusion that someone knows more about their beloved (Brigadier) Enoch (MBE) that anyone else. That sort of worked for @transam but he got here first.

 

Oops. There's that "in the paper" thing again.

 

Excuse me while I don't panic.

You would if you lived in a town like that,another drug dealer stabbed to death in slaugh yesterday by two others,by the look of them and their names sound Muslims.

Edited by bert bloggs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ozimoron said:
1 hour ago, transam said:

You are doing the anti-Brit thing again.........Thank you, it clarifies stuff from you........????

Huh? anti Brit? How did you infer that from my post about Australian racism?

Don't panic. It happens a lot when some members stray into the deep end.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanLaew said:

The fact that there is no middle ground these days and political parties of many nations have allowed themselves to be browbeaten, railroaded and hogwashed by their own extremists is a valid view which I share 100%

 

However, in this instance, you (we) are off topic.

Its just the internet where the lefties and rights yell abuse at each other from their own corners . Out in the real world people aren't  as polarised and are more middle ground

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

No, it is not racist.

 

It's a rubbish PhotoShop job.

Being fake does not excuse it from being racist. If anything it makes it even more egregious because it's not just reporting a racist act it's sole raison d'etre is instigating racism.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Not for that reason. I have now said 4 times that immigration should be restricted. The only reason is because of economic disruption, orderly immigration is fine.

 

Powell made overtly racist remarks which drown out any other conversation he may have wanted to have. He is rightly vilified by all right thinking people because of it. Flashes of reason don't redeem racists.

In Enoch's time it was possible for 500,000,000 people from India to open a corner shop in the UK, no visa, but you're OK with that, Enoch wasn't......

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""