Jump to content

Prince William just inherited a 685-year-old estate worth $1 billion


Scott

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, baboon said:

Ah. So now it matters what job you did as part of the patriot qualifying criteria. I see. Does a binman or a postal worker have any less right to retire abroad now than a squaddie?

Nice dodge, but my post applies to anyone, I quoted an example, please try again....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jak2002003 said:

How about we all give it a rest now. It's getting tedious.  You can keep your opinion while the rest of us on here agreed to disagree with you. 

We are having a discussion, it's what forums are for......????....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baboon said:

Could you please rephrase the question as what you wrote before was basically rhetorical. 

Perhaps you should give up, your posts are confusing, as well as your dodges.....I am still waiting for the "flag" explanation....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, transam said:

Perhaps you should give up, your posts are confusing, as well as your dodges.....I am still waiting for the "flag" explanation....????

I have already explained to you that your "flag" post was removed for trolling. And as such, I am not willing to risk sanctioning by responding.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, us Brits have had a reigning Monarch on a throne for over a thousand years and it will carry on, other countries cannot comprehend this due to their history Australia for instance founded on a penal colony in the 17th century or the US founded in 1776 when they accepted Independence from England suck it up boy's.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Yes Baboon you asked why does our Monarch need so much protection i asked why does a American President fly over a six ton armoured, bomb proof, limo for protection perhaps ?

Actually no, I didn't. I asked another poster how much more protection they needed over and above what they already have.

And in answer to your question, you would need to speak to the American secret service about it, not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, baboon said:

Actually no, I didn't. I asked another poster how much more protection they needed over and above what they already have.

And in answer to your question, you would need to speak to the American secret service about it, not me.

Aren't they surrounded by armed guards? How much more defence do they need? I think you were asking another member this question so i asked you a security question i never asked about the secret service but you deflected the answer never mind.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Aren't they surrounded by armed guards? How much more defence do they need? I think you were asking another member this question so i asked you a security question i never asked about the secret service but you deflected the answer never mind.

Clearly one of us is getting the wrong end of the stick, so I think we had better leave it there. Enjoy your afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

A patriot..... "a person who supports their country and is prepared to defend it."

Fair enough.

 

3 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

 

That would include defending King/Queen also. Something you are not doing.

 

No it doesn't. You are basically saying that the constitution is fixed forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RayC said:

Fair enough.

 

No it doesn't. You are basically saying that the constitution is fixed forever.

In the present. That is where we are. There is a monarch. Patriots defend the monarch.

 

Should the constitution ever change, we'll talk again.

 

In the mean time, you are being churlish.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Throughout the 19th Century there were multiple debates in Parliament on the abolition of the monarchy, at a time when the UK’s left wing parties didn’t exist, socialism and communism were not yet even invented.

Communism 19th century.

Socialism 18th Century.

 

You say there were multiple debates about abolishing the monarchy. How many resulted in "yes" to abolishing?

 

There may have been  minority of Republicans in Parliament but there certainly has not been a history of republicanism in UK.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

In the present. That is where we are. There is a monarch. Patriots defend the monarch.

 

Should the constitution ever change, we'll talk again.

 

In the mean time, you are being churlish.

I am not being churlish. I am disagreeing with your premise that in order to be a patriot, you also have to be a monarchist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RayC said:

I am not being churlish. I am disagreeing with your premise that in order to be a patriot, you also have to be a monarchist.

No. I said in order to be a patriot you must be prepared to defend your nation. That would include the monarchy. 

 

I have never said you have to be a monarchies.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...