Jump to content

Germany arrests 25 accused of plotting coup


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

I thought I provided an example from 50 years ago when I mentioned the Baader-Meinhof Gang in my first comment. I think he did say "never" about threats from the left in his post. Perhaps I misunderstood.

I am posting in the wrong thread, sorry.

Posted
1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

You might think it's balanced but you ignored the trial itself.

 

You made a claim of fact. That contradicts "In your opinion". You can't claim a fact and then hide behind "IMO".

I've got no idea of what you're talking about, and bear in mind, I am talking English instead of German - I'm struggling with your interpretation.

 

2 hours ago, JCauto said:

The "Far Left" is a fantasy that was invented to make people forget just how extreme the Right has become

Regardless of the story - is this to be taken as a fact ?

  • Like 1
Posted

Nor that your statement is incorrect, of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. 

 

Right - thankyou.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Pla Simon said:

Nor that your statement is incorrect, of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. 

 

Right - thankyou.

Should we call ghost busters?

Posted
1 hour ago, JCauto said:

This is to me problematic - not about yourself personally, as I don't know you nor have I recalled any posts of yours. Nor that your statement is incorrect, of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. 

What's problematic is that here is an unambiguous article about a clear threat from the Right and, in all places, in Germany where it all went so bad in the past. An article that points out how this is just another example of the threats to democracy that are all emerging around the same time and from the same general political direction. The response of many from the Right is to downplay the seriousness of the incident and then to engage in "whataboutism". Your post was classic "whataboutism". Sure, there are some Left radicals/extremists that exist in this world. Why are you even mentioning them? What did they have to do with this incident? Why bring them up unless there's been a concerted effort from the Left to overthrow democratically elected governments? 

This is why I responded to your post. It is the same reason why we Lefties get upset with "All Lives Matter". Sure, of course, that was never in question and was never THE question. It's raised to reduce the impact of the BLM movement by trivializing what they're fighting against and it's raised by people who are not and have never been threatened in the same way. 

Excuse my tardy reply - housework completed and a pot of ganja tea simmering.

 

To me it's not problematic -

 

I'm always up for fair play - and I'm happy for you to have your own viewpoint - I must be out of date on whataboutism. I alluded to extremities on all sides, as a balance to an inconsistancy I saw. Extremes are different to different people, in different ways.

 

Proclivity sees the precipitation of powerful political movements, and their tangible affects / effects, from both sides.

 

I'm in no doubt that extremist elements are everywhere in society - but the ultra leaning are usually in a minority. I'm more interested in the catalyst of such an event - the cognitive - everyone has their own justification for an action - this is my fascination.

 

Here's a bit about me - 

 

Born in the U.K. - 1 of 12 - I've travelled almost all of my life, and have lived in SE. Asia for around 30 Years now - harmoniously, without religious or political discourse - I prefer to transcend ontological impasse.

 

If you're looking for posts, I'm not on here much - I like to limit my time on the internet, and the anomie it nurtures. Mine are usually <deleted> one liners, without connotational malice.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pla Simon said:

Excuse my tardy reply - housework completed and a pot of ganja tea simmering.

 

To me it's not problematic -

 

I'm always up for fair play - and I'm happy for you to have your own viewpoint - I must be out of date on whataboutism. I alluded to extremities on all sides, as a balance to an inconsistancy I saw. Extremes are different to different people, in different ways.

 

Proclivity sees the precipitation of powerful political movements, and their tangible affects / effects, from both sides.

 

I'm in no doubt that extremist elements are everywhere in society - but the ultra leaning are usually in a minority. I'm more interested in the catalyst of such an event - the cognitive - everyone has their own justification for an action - this is my fascination.

 

Here's a bit about me - 

 

Born in the U.K. - 1 of 12 - I've travelled almost all of my life, and have lived in SE. Asia for around 30 Years now - harmoniously, without religious or political discourse - I prefer to transcend ontological impasse.

 

If you're looking for posts, I'm not on here much - I like to limit my time on the internet, and the anomie it nurtures. Mine are usually <deleted> one liners, without connotational malice.

Nevertheless, your false equivalence of the issue belonging to both sides is manifestly incorrect and you attracted push back for it. More objectivity would further enhance your peaceful life.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Pla Simon said:

I responded to a concession by the op - I've got no idea what you mean.

A clue might be to read your post I replied to.

 

Below is a throwaway comment with no argument in support or substantiation. It's risible and I responded that way.

 

"of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. "

Posted (edited)

Funny seeing these larping cosplay characters being taken seriously by the authorities...I guess it feeds their "democracy in peril" narrative they keep pushing on a gulible public ???? 

Edited by Pattaya Spotter
  • Love It 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

Funny seeing these larping cosplay characters being taken seriously by the authorities...I guess it feeds their "democracy in peril" narrative they keep pushing on a gulible public ???? 

They should have been ignored?

Posted
5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

A clue might be to read your post I replied to.

 

Below is a throwaway comment with no argument in support or substantiation. It's risible and I responded that way.

 

"of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. "

That quote was from JCauto - I was responding to him.

 

Perhaps you should direct your post towards him ?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pla Simon said:

That quote was from JCauto - I was responding to him.

 

Perhaps you should direct your post towards him ?

No, it's a public forum. I'll continue to criticise or boost posts as I see fit.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

Nevertheless, your false equivalence of the issue belonging to both sides is manifestly incorrect and you attracted push back for it. More objectivity would further enhance your peaceful life.

Is this neverthelessism ?

 

You would do well not to patronise me - I am well versed in the King's - Years of classical studies and remain steadfastly alakefic to unnecessary diatribe.  You would do well also not to try to compel speech or perspective., which seems to be a reoccuring trait of yours.

 

I was under the impression this is supposed to be an intellectual arena ?

 

There was no false equivalence - it was a response to a self confessed 'lefty' s' verbatim., as I quote:-

 

"The "Far Left" is a fantasy that was invented to make people forget just how extreme the Right has become"

 

which is obviously a flawed bias, and if you want to play pedantic antagonist, a statement unrelated to the factual issue at hand.

 

The guy conceeded the point in an honourable fashion, and I thanked him.

 

If you would read my subsequent posts, you would realise your interpretation of events is completely incorrect.

 

I fail to see how I could take a more objectified view, but seeing as you want to make such suggestions, do you have any thought on the weaponisation of nazi guilt as a proposition ?

 

Pertaining to the the far left being a fantasy, do you have a view on advocacy for initiation of gender reassignment surgery on minors as a proposition ?

 

I would be a fool to assume this wasn't to be classed as an act of far right extreme ideology, or to assume the perpetrators motives without evidence, but I would suggest it's reactionary, to some degree.

Edited by Pla Simon
Posted
47 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

A clue might be to read your post I replied to.

 

Below is a throwaway comment with no argument in support or substantiation. It's risible and I responded that way.

 

"of course there are radicals on all sides, and even some sides that we as normal people probably don't even know exist. "

I will say again - that throw away comment was another poster's quote.

 

JCauto's quote.

 

37 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

No, it's a public forum. I'll continue to criticise or boost posts as I see fit.

You make no sense to me. 

 

I cannot engage with your intellect - not for the want of trying.

 

Goodbye.

Posted
Just now, Pla Simon said:

Is this neverthelessism ?

 

You would do well not to patronise me - I am well versed in the King's - Years of classical studies and remain steadfastly alakefic to unnecessary diatribe.  You would do well also not to try to compel speech or perspective., which seems to be a reoccuring trait of yours.

 

I was under the impression this is supposed to be an intellectual arena ?

 

There was no false equivalence - it was a response to a self confessed 'lefty' s' verbatim., as I quote:-

 

"The "Far Left" is a fantasy that was invented to make people forget just how extreme the Right has become"

 

which is obviously a flawed bias, and if you want to play pedantic antagonist, a statement unrelated to the factual issue at hand.

 

The guy conceeded the point in an honourable fashion, and I thanked him.

 

If you would read my subsequent posts, you would realise your interpretation of events is completely incorrect.

 

I fail to see how I could take a more objectified view, but seeing as you want to make such suggestions, do you have any thought on the weaponisation of nazi guilt as a proposition ?

 

Pertaining to the the far left being a fantasy, do you have a view on advocacy for initiation of gender assignment surgery on minors as a proposition ?

 

I would be a fool to assume this wasn't to be classed as an act of far right extreme ideology, or to assume the perpetrators motives without evidence, but I would suggest it's reactionary, to some degree.

There is reasoned, substantiated argument and there is unsupported claims of a fact.

 

You're engaging in projection bordering on flaming.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, internationalism said:

Strangely too many cops, even if suspects were armed (but they were not).

They did find a huge cache of weapons at the prince’s residence, though, so it’s not as if they were dealing with boy scouts. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

At the time of first press releases there were nothing about arms caches or any arms whatsoever. 
As police watched them for over a year they had clue who might be armed. Out of 25 only the ringleader had them and he was not able to use it. It was stored at his place for somebody else. There were not likely to be explosive materials, which can be all detonated, but guns. 
 

Edited by internationalism
Posted
7 hours ago, JCauto said:

Yep, you sure are. Here's an article where they describe arresting a Far-Right plot to literally overthrow the German government and replace it with Fascists, and yet somehow or other there's some statement about the Far Left? Who? Where? What did they have to do with this? Where have the Far Left been organizing and undertaking coup d'etats like we have seen in two major Western democracies in the last two years? Answer: nowhere, nobody, never. The "Far Left" is a fantasy that was invented to make people forget just how extreme the Right has become.

They have been too busy removing statues and gluing themselves to things 

Posted
3 hours ago, ozimoron said:

There is reasoned, substantiated argument and there is unsupported claims of a fact.

 

You're engaging in projection bordering on flaming.

This is one of those irregular verbs, isn't it?

 

I engage in substantiated argument

You peddle unsupported claims

He engages in projection bordering on flaming.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

They have been too busy removing statues and gluing themselves to things 

Wow, so they were a clear and present danger to democracy. Not.

 

In the meantime, a bunch of right wing nutbags stormed the Capitol, with a view of hanging Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi and possibly a few others, and overturning the result of a fair election because their guy Trump had lost. And now these German right wing nutbags wanted to storm the parliament building and stage a coup. 
 

Spot the differences. Which group would you say is more dangerous, the far left (busy removing statues and gluing themselves to things), or the far right (busy stagings coups d’état)?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

 

 

In the meantime, a bunch of right wing nutbags stormed the Capitol, with a view of hanging Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi and possibly a few others, and overturning the result of a fair election because their guy Trump had lost. 
 

 

Really, when did that happen ?????

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
14 hours ago, pacovl46 said:

Like 25 people could overthrow a government and take control of a country...

 

Doomed to fail from the getgo! 

Yes but if they'd gone ahead there could have been a lot of dead. Reading their plans, policies and intentions they obviously had no idea how stupid their idiotic little pipe dreams were. They expected to be able to convince the masses and military to back them. Clueless. Pack of spaffers. But nasty, spiteful and dangerous spaffers.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, ozimoron said:

left and right are almost insignificant when it comes to the extreme. people have been known to switch from extreme left to extreme right and back. I think the main common denominator is the "extreme". left and right just provided them with excuses to do what they wanted to do.

Edited by tgw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 3

      Best time of day for jomtien immigration?

    2. 14

      Chrome

    3. 41

      "Medical" device ordered outside Thailand being held by Import Export Inspection Division

    4. 3

      Best time of day for jomtien immigration?

    5. 9

      Rice cooker WITHOUT Aluminum ??

    6. 428

      Thailand's Expats Urged to Register with TRD for Tax, Says Expert

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...