Jump to content

Bangkok police offer public apology, but do not admit to extortion of Taiwanese actress


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Artisi said:

Isn't most of what they do an absurdity? 

Agreed..

Showing how stupid they really are, and now it's gone global.

Would have been better to let the lady go with a caution, but that's not how it rolls in Thailand.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

National polcie chief Pol Gen Damrongsak Kittiprapas ordered the transfer and a disciplinary committee set up to assess the severity of penalties and criminal prosecution against the policemen if they are found being involved in the alleged extortion.

Caught red handed, but it'll be hushed up after transfers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Charging a tourist for possession of an electronic cigarette is absurdity in itself.

Indeed it is, nonetheless they are banned in Thailand therefore if using/carrying you leave yourself open to extortion.

 

That said, Thailand is a country where the endemic corruption allows you to negate the legal ramifications of doing so and therefore some are happy to test their luck. On the other hand, other countries that have also banned them with less accommodating Police Forces are off the visit list, such as ... Taiwan :coffee1:

 

NB The law in Taiwan hadn't been finalised at the time of her trip.

Edited by Salerno
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A better approach of course might have been to say oops, I'm sorry, I didn't know vaping equipment is illegal in Thailand (which is true), of course I should be charged (which is also true)...let's go. At the station, the coin may drop with more senior people, hmm, this is the first person we've ever charged for this crime, perhaps we should let her go. Or, in court the judge may have the same reaction, if indeed a lawyer in the meantime didn't intervene. There's no extortion, there's no bribery charge and the fine would likely be less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

LOL. The web of lies gets sillier by the day!

 

The actress was released without charge, but, supposedly after paying cash. This is now called a "bribe" instead of extortion, no doubt in order to blame the person paying the 'bribe', rather than police extorting money from the victim. Also, no explanation why a "charge for illegal possession of an electronic cigarette" is a whopping 27,000 baht.

Yes, it is crazy. But you have to understand the subtle logic that is in play. She didn't have to pay them, she could have accepted the charge of having illegal vaping gear but she chose not to. So technically and in practise, she did bribe them. Fire away!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

If she had vaping gear. What happend to the original story about the 'wrong visa'?

Don't worry too much, anything to keep the story going is ok - that includes the media and a few posters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Double whammy for Thailand. Now everyone knows....

 

1.    Thai police are corrupt to the core.

2.   Vaping is illegal in Thailand and doing so makes you a target for extortion.

 

Just legalize vaping for god's sake. It's hardly crack cocaine.

 

 

I don't know, an admission from the top counts as something, it points to not everyone approving of corruption so that will have some positive mileage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MRToMRT said:

One thing to add which is not in the OP (but in this mornings BKP). They are going to charge the officers with "dereliction of duty" but but but, get this, not for the bribe but not officially booking and fining her for the possession of an illegal item (the vape).

 

This country!!!!

Quite even though some of the officers admit they asked for the money, according to the BKP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

I don't know. All I can say is that the police have proven to be unreliable narrators in this incident.

As has she, kudos for her on calling them out, I have no doubt she was ripped off but is a damn shame she had to embellish/omit from her account - some of which can be put down to translation issues but not all of them.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nigelforbes said:

That was just a red herring to distract dimwits and to embellish the story. ????

according to todays reports the officers admitted to extortion...now why would they admit that if they did not do it?  also the reports indicate that checkpoint and cops helmet cameras had been wiped clean....now why would they do that as surely the video would prove their innocence?

dimwits?  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pomchop said:

according to todays reports the officers admitted to extortion...now why would they admit that if they did not do it?  also the reports indicate that checkpoint and cops helmet cameras had been wiped clean....now why would they do that as surely the video would prove their innocence?

dimwits?  

Can you not read and comprehend, that post was in reference to the comment by a previous poster who queried what happened to the visa issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...