Jump to content

Breaking: Trump to cut Ireland trip short and return to New York to ‘confront’ E Jean Carroll


Social Media

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Here's what could be going on here. For 2 years, Trump was repeatedly asked for a DNA sample to compare the alleged semen stain on the plaintiff's dress to Trump's DNA. He refused. After the deadline had passed, he offered to provide a sample provided certain vague conditions were met. At any rate, since the deadline had passed, the judge ruled against Trump. Now it could be he's setting up to claim that he wanted to testify, after the deadline had passed,  but the judge wouldn't allow him to.

And what does it mean that he wants to confront her? Where?

Probably just wants to try and intimidate her it’s his thing but here’s a thought with that ruling against the guys he told to stand back and stand by (the proud boys)he just might head east ???? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge gives Trump until Sunday to change his mind about testifying in his rape and defamation trial

 

NEW YORK CITY — Lawyers for the prosecution and defense both rested their case Thursday in the rape and defamation lawsuit brought against former President Donald Trump by writer E. Jean Carroll, but testimony in the case may not yet be over.

 

Judge Lewis Kaplan said late Thursday that he would give Trump until 5 p.m. Sunday evening to change his mind about taking the witness stand in his own defense to rebut Carroll’s testimony that he raped her in a changing room in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s and then lied about it.

 

If Trump decides to testify, his lawyers must file a motion to reopen the case “for the sole purpose of testifying,” the judge said. Kaplan clarified that he will not necessarily grant the motion, simply that he would consider it.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/judge-gives-trump-until-sunday-to-change-his-mind-about-testifying-in-his-rape-and-defamation-trial-221420292.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

I thought that he was in Scotland?

 

 

You can read the text of Trump's deposition in this case here

 

Donald Trump Deposition Unsealed: Lashes Out at Rape Accuser — ‘I Think She’s Sick, Mentally Sick’

 

https://lawandcrime.com/trump/donald-trump-deposition-unsealed-lashes-out-at-rape-accuser-i-think-shes-sick-mentally-sick/

The jury got to watch excertps including one in which he told the lawyer questioning him that she was not his type. The super genius strikes again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, placeholder said:

The jury got to watch excertps including one in which he told the lawyer questioning him that she was not his type. The super genius strikes again.

Except when shown a picture of Ms. Carroll from back in the day, he identified her as Marla Maples, his former wife.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, placeholder said:

Here's what could be going on here. For 2 years, Trump was repeatedly asked for a DNA sample to compare the alleged semen stain on the plaintiff's dress to Trump's DNA. He refused. After the deadline had passed, he offered to provide a sample provided certain vague conditions were met. At any rate, since the deadline had passed, the judge ruled against Trump. Now it could be he's setting up to claim that he wanted to testify, after the deadline had passed,  but the judge wouldn't allow him to.

And what does it mean that he wants to confront her? Where?

This is the Judges ruling on page 4.   https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.56.0.pdf

 

Also note that DNA sample, as referenced in the ruling, on dress in question is not a sperm sample.

 

image.jpeg

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Except when shown a picture of Ms. Carroll from back in the day, he identified her as Marla Maples, his former wife.

He said Carroll was not his type....................lol

 

During the October deposition, Mr Trump was shown a black-and-white photo of himself speaking to people at an event. He said: "It's Marla," referring to his second wife Marla Maples, before his lawyer corrected him saying: "No, that's Carroll."

https://news.sky.com/story/its-marla-donald-trump-confuses-rape-accuser-with-ex-wife-trial-told-12873372

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m going with 2.

I'll add a 3rd one, setting up grounds for appeal, same as the previous objection made against the judge's rulings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

Why is he cutting his trip short, is this an unexpected event?

2 explanations, 1. His lawyers feel the case is going so bad they have to change tactics and put him on the stand; and 2. He wants the publicity. 

My guess is 1.

maybe #1 BUT definitely #2.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ms. Carroll first requested in early 2020 that Mr. Trump provide a sample of his DNA for comparison, Mr. Trump repeatedly refused.

Nearly three years later, Mr. Tacopina told the court that his client was finally willing to provide a DNA sample, under certain conditions, specifically, Mr. Trump offered his DNA in exchange for an appendix to a laboratory report that Ms. Carroll commissioned about genetic material on the dress.

Judge Kaplan called Mr. Trump’s offer a stalling tactic, noting in a pretrial ruling that his offer came after a deadline to disclose evidence had already passed, Judge Kaplan also said that the two sides had already agreed in a joint order that no DNA experts would be called as witnesses."

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/27/nyregion/dna-evidence-trump-carroll-trial.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also from the above NYTimes report:

 

And even if Mr. Trump provided DNA, Judge Kaplan said in his ruling, it might not matter for the trial. “It is possible that the results of further DNA analysis using Mr. Trump’s DNA sample would be entirely inconclusive,” he wrote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Also from the above NYTimes report:

 

And even if Mr. Trump provided DNA, Judge Kaplan said in his ruling, it might not matter for the trial. “It is possible that the results of further DNA analysis using Mr. Trump’s DNA sample would be entirely inconclusive,” he wrote.

Something that could have been decided on if Trump had supplied a sample of his DNA when asked for in 2020, which he refused to do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The alleged damage to E.Jean Carroll's reputation in this civil case could cost up to $2.7 million acccording to a legal expert. I doubt Trump will risk more exposures and discoveries by appearing  in court for such a small amount. There is still a criminal assault element in this case and doubt he will take that kind of risk to be questioned by prosecutors under oath. He is simply sticking to his playbook with his usual innuendos to his captive audience. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Something that could have been decided on if Trump had supplied a sample of his DNA when asked for in 2020, which he refused to do.

Yes and you can read on page 12 of Judge Kaplan's order that Trump's attorneys refused and would adamantly oppose any motion to compel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...