webfact Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 Picture: INN Narathiwat - Following a complaint posted on social media, accusing officers from the Su-ngai Kolok Police Station in Narathiwat province of forcing individuals to remove their clothes and stand under the scorching sun, the truth behind the incident has been distorted. The complaint was made on May 20, 2023, and alleged that 14 individuals were subjected to punishment, resulting in redness and blistering on some of their backs, causing discomfort and difficulty in lying down, reported INN Recently, a reporter visited the Su-ngai Kolok Police Station to investigate the facts surrounding the incident. During the visit, they met with Captain Adisorn, the Deputy Head of the Prevention and Suppression Unit at the Su-ngai Kolok Police Station, who was one of the 14 individuals accused. Captain Adisorn clarified that on that day, the disciplinary action only required individuals to stand according to the prescribed posture, with each posture changing approximately every hour. There was no physical contact involved. The rumors of individuals fainting and requiring hospitalization are untrue. Everyone stood, and those who felt unwell were permitted to sit. They would stand again after a short rest. Lieutenant Colonel Kampan Santhaweesuk, Deputy Chief of the Investigation Division at the Su-ngai Kolok Police Station, explained that the punishment administered on that day was due to various officers neglecting their duties, which constituted a breach of regulations. It was a matter of internal disciplinary action, which had been repeatedly warned and reminded to the officers. The punishment administered was to ensure a consistent and standard approach to their duties. The disciplinary action taken did not involve any excessive measures beyond what was mandated by police regulations. Assistant Commissioner Prayat Baitet, Chief of the Su-ngai Kolok Police Station, who was on official duty in another area at the time, expressed his concerns regarding the incident after being informed. He promptly sent a clarification letter to the media, emphasizing nine key points: The punishment was a result of officers' negligence in carrying out their duties. The disciplinary measures were within the boundaries set by police regulations. There were no severe or excessive actions taken. Officers were given warnings and reminders regarding their duties on multiple occasions. The disciplinary measures were intended to ensure consistent and standard practices within the police force. No physical harm or mistreatment occurred during the punishment. Reports of individuals fainting and requiring medical attention are baseless and untrue. The police station will continue to adhere to regulations and strive for professionalism. The incident has been blown out of proportion, and the police force maintains its commitment to serve the community with integrity and respect. The clarification aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the incident and dispel any misconceptions surrounding the allegations. The Su-ngai Kolok Police Station remains committed to upholding the highest standards of professionalism and ethical conduct while serving the community. -- © Copyright ASEAN NOW 2023-05-23 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. The most versatile and flexible rental investment and holiday home solution in Thailand - click for more information. Get your business in front of millions of customers who read ASEAN NOW with an interest in Thailand every month - email [email protected] for more information 2
Popular Post JoePai Posted May 23, 2023 Popular Post Posted May 23, 2023 No physical harm or mistreatment occurred during the punishment. Total nonsense, this is the sort of punishment that happened in the Eighteenth century 3 2
ikke1959 Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 It is a misunderstanding....Nothing happened, but the law against torture was not accepted by the court.. If there is nothing wrong why not accept laws against torture and abuse.. Although investigation don't say anything as we all know that probably if you tell the truth you life will be more miserable. So better leave it so and go on....
Popular Post brianthainess Posted May 23, 2023 Popular Post Posted May 23, 2023 So the Sun burning them, possible skin cancer are fine. They just don't get it do they, pathetic RTP low education all round IMO. Docking there wages would have more effect IMO. 4 3 1
BritScot Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 This just shows the education level of those incharge. What a statement. I hope this gathers momentum and that idiotic statement gets people who sanctioned this charged and fired.
flyingtlger Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 7 hours ago, webfact said: the truth behind the incident has been distorted Tell me it aint so....
hotchilli Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 8 hours ago, webfact said: The clarification aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the incident and dispel any misconceptions surrounding the allegations. In other words "mind your own business"
hotchilli Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 8 hours ago, webfact said: Everyone stood, and those who felt unwell were permitted to sit. They would stand again after a short rest. Punishment with compassion Thailand 2023
DudleySquat Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 13 hours ago, webfact said: Captain Adisorn clarified that on that day, the disciplinary action only required individuals to stand according to the prescribed posture, with each posture changing approximately every hour. Isn't the leakage of truth among the plethora of bull shi t is amazing? How many hours were they standing in the sun with no protection? 2
RichardColeman Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 9 hours ago, webfact said: The punishment was a result of officers' negligence in carrying out their duties. The disciplinary measures were within the boundaries set by police regulations. There were no severe or excessive actions taken. Officers were given warnings and reminders regarding their duties on multiple occasions. The disciplinary measures were intended to ensure consistent and standard practices within the police force. No physical harm or mistreatment occurred during the punishment. This is the response of people that internal review 'themselves'
Liverpool Lou Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 Amazing, now AN members love chronically negligent RTP officers who are due punishment so much! What a turnaround.
kennw Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 9 hours ago, brianthainess said: So the Sun burning them, possible skin cancer are fine. They just don't get it do they, pathetic RTP low education all round IMO. Docking there wages would have more effect IMO. Dismiss from the service more appropriate.. NOT to inactive post. all ranks.
Andycoops Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 22 hours ago, JoePai said: No physical harm or mistreatment occurred during the punishment. Total nonsense, this is the sort of punishment that happened in the Eighteenth century Exactly the century the Thai police are in.
Andycoops Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 I would like to see exactly where it states in the police regulations that there is a disciplinary measure that can be invoked where it clearly states that officers can be made to stand in the sun without the correct clothing for hours on end...
Bangkok Barry Posted May 24, 2023 Posted May 24, 2023 No females were negligent in their duty, then? How very disappointing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now