White House omits Hunter Biden from visitor logs

[Social Media]

 

The White House has repeatedly touted the Biden administration as the 'most transparent administration in American history'

 

The Biden White House has repeatedly claimed they are the "most transparent administration in American history," but a Fox News Digital review found that the visitor logs from the beginning of the Biden administration through February 2023 have not included any of Hunter Biden’s White House visits or extended stays.

Fox News Digital reviewed several articles to piece together Hunter Biden’s whereabouts during his dad’s administration and found that he has visited the White House over a dozen times through February 2023, the month accounted for in the most recent batch of visitor logs released last month.

A majority of the White House visits that Fox News Digital found were from 2022, which include the annual egg roll, Medal of Freedom ceremony, France State Dinner on the South Lawn, Christmas tree lighting, his daughter’s wedding, among others. However, they are all absent from the visitor logs, including what appear to be extended stays at the White House.

While many of these events are ceremonial and a tradition at the White House, Fox News Digital previously reported how Hunter Biden sought to use such events for his personal financial gain during the Obama administration. 

Hunter and his longtime business partner, Eric Schwerin, would coordinate with his father's White House staff to invite business associates and potential business partners they were courting to official events. 

 

FULL STORY

 

 

 

[Hanaguma]

Wow, there's  a shocker. Covering up for the wayward son. Wonder why they would do that?  Nothing nefarious, I'm sure....

[SunnyinBangrak]

10 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Wow, there's  a shocker. Covering up for the wayward son. Wonder why they would do that?  Nothing nefarious, I'm sure....

I'm sure this is the only time they were dishonest/lying about Hunter, and it is not a part of a highly organized and coordinated effort to deny sleaze and corruption at the highest level for political gain.

 Still, it was pretty bad that while the meetings had long been proven, they were still called "conspiracy theories". More transparency needed imo

Edited June 28, 2023 by SunnyinBangrak

[Skipalongcassidy]

The only way to make history reflect what you want it to is to rewrite it... 

[SunnyinBangrak]

19 minutes ago, Social Media said:

Hunter and his longtime business partner, Eric Schwerin, would coordinate with his father's White House staff to invite business associates and potential business partners they were courting to official events. 

The narrative was "Nobody is claiming Joe Biden had any knowledge of, nor has ever been implicated in any way, nor has ever discussed overseas business with his son", so presumably the white house records that showed he DID meet the people we were forced to accept he did not meet is problematic. 

 I suspect we are about to see the left suddenly pivot away from JB and toward Newsom. The situation is untenable. Seeing KJP getting humiliated when she was faced with the lies was toe curling. This can not continue. I'm watching the Krassenstein/Pakman/TYT/brooklyndad accounts to see when this pivot occurs.

Edited June 28, 2023 by SunnyinBangrak

[Hanaguma]

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The narrative was "Nobody is claiming Joe Biden had any knowledge of, nor has ever been implicated in any way, nor has ever discussed overseas business with his son", so presumably the white house records that showed he DID meet the people we were forced to accept he did not meet is problematic. 

 I suspect we are about to see the left suddenly pivot away from JB and toward Newsom. The situation is untenable. Seeing KJP getting humiliated when she was faced with the lies was toe curling. This can not continue. I'm watching the Krassenstein/Pakman/TYT/brooklyndad accounts to see when this pivot occurs.

THe NARRATIVE is also changing. It used to be that Joe Biden had no knowledge of, and never discussed, any business wit Hunter. That is now becoming Joe Biden did not get involved in any business with Hunter.  

 

Interesting...

[JonnyF]

They've been lying about Hunter for years. Why stop now?

[bendejo]

2 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Unlike Trump, who kept the identity of all white house visitors secret. But then, Trump had so much more to hide. 

And so many of his appointees turned out to be just visitors. 

But what it bought for Hunter is the best possible excuse for not visiting his parents.

 

[Tug]

Another nothing burger they are really scratching for something anything to take attention away from their front runners indictments ???? hey how come you guys aren’t over on the trump blabbing top secret doc.on tape thread?just curious lol 

[Bkk Brian]

1 hour ago, Social Media said:

The Biden White House has repeatedly claimed they are the "most transparent administration in American history," but a Fox News Digital review found that the visitor logs from the beginning of the Biden administration through February 2023 have not included any of Hunter Biden’s White House visits or extended stays.

Not sure its so easy to claim they are the most most transparent administration in American history but Biden's administration is certainly more transparent than the previous one where Trump made White House visitor logs secret breaking with Obama's initiative to make them public when he was in office.

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Wow, there's  a shocker. Covering up for the wayward son. Wonder why they would do that?  Nothing nefarious, I'm sure....

 

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Not sure its so easy to claim they are the most most transparent administration in American history but Biden's administration is certainly more transparent than the previous one where Trump made White House visitor logs secret breaking with Obama's initiative to make them public when he was in office.

 

42 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

They've been lying about Hunter for years. Why stop now?

 

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

The only way to make history reflect what you want it to is to rewrite it... 

Oh no...after years of my denialism I have to confess that this latest piece of information is utterly and conclusively damning. There is no way this special treatment of Hunter Biden can be justified or explained away...well except if you actually read the entire article. Did any of you get to the part where the articles notes that the White House, when it restored transparency to the visitors log, noted that among the exceptions one was for family member whose visits won't be record unless they involve official or political business. In other words, not special treatment for Hunter Biden.  I think that bears repeating: Not special treatment for Hunter Biden.

At any rate here is are excerpts from the official white house policy.

 

As previously announced, President Biden is reinstating a policy to voluntarily disclose White House visitor logs. These logs will include appointment information for individuals who have been processed to enter the White House complex, including the White House, Eisenhower Executive Office Building, and New Executive Office Building. Naval Observatory records related to White House business will also be released when they are generated...

 

• The White House will not release access records related to purely personal guests of the First and Second Families (i.e., visits that do not involve any official or political business).

https://www.whitehouse.gov/voluntary-disclosure/

[sirineou]

They were probably trying to shield him from prosecution, because everyone knows that it is a federal crime for a child of a president to visit his/hers father at the white house. 

I believe trump did the same . I

tell you,, these presidents! what are we going to do with them?

" The trump administration says it will not make public the names of those visiting the White House"

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/04/14/523968950/white-house-says-it-will-no-longer-release-visitor-logs-to-the-public

[Lacessit]

A fruitful thread for the tin hat brigade.

Perhaps in the rush to judgment, it has not occurred to them there may be a valid security reason for doing so. Kidnappers love people who have a predictable routine.

Edited June 28, 2023 by Lacessit

[candide]

24 minutes ago, placeholder said:

 

 

 

Oh no...after years of my denialism I have to confess that this latest piece of information is utterly and conclusively damning. There is no way this special treatment of Hunter Biden can be justified or explained away...well except if you actually read the entire article. Did any of you get to the part where the articles notes that the White House, when it restored transparency to the visitors log, noted that among the exceptions one was for family member whose visits won't be record unless they involve official or political business. In other words, not special treatment for Hunter Biden.  I think that bears repeating: Not special treatment for Hunter Biden.

At any rate here is are excerpts from the official white house policy.

 

As previously announced, President Biden is reinstating a policy to voluntarily disclose White House visitor logs. These logs will include appointment information for individuals who have been processed to enter the White House complex, including the White House, Eisenhower Executive Office Building, and New Executive Office Building. Naval Observatory records related to White House business will also be released when they are generated...

 

• The White House will not release access records related to purely personal guests of the First and Second Families (i.e., visits that do not involve any official or political business).

https://www.whitehouse.gov/voluntary-disclosure/

So familly members logs are not disclosed, it makes sense.

MAGAs are so desperate for having nothing, that they are ready to grasp at any straw

[EVENKEEL]

The smartest man joe knows doesn't need to sign in. C'mon man.

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

The smartest man joe knows doesn't need to sign in. C'mon man.

What does Hunter Biden's alleged intellect have to do with that fact that he's a Biden family member, and like all other Biden family members, the White House rules specifically said that their visits wouldn't be recorded? In other words there was no exceptional treatment for Hunter Biden.

This comment of yours is intellectually vacant. In other words, you've got nothing.

[Hanaguma]

22 minutes ago, candide said:

So familly members logs are not disclosed, it makes sense.

MAGAs are so desperate for having nothing, that they are ready to grasp at any straw

Except that they WERE logged under Obama, when Joe was VP (at least some of the time).  So Joe's "most transparent administration" is patently a lie.

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Except that they WERE logged under Obama, when Joe was VP (at least some of the time).  So Joe's "most transparent administration" is patently a lie.

Yep it's certainly a falsehood. Whether Biden lied about it goes to intent. Unless, of course, you also agree that the following is a lie: : "Wow, there's  a shocker. Covering up for the wayward son." Or was this just a falsehood?

[Hanaguma]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

Yep it's certainly a falsehood. Whether Biden lied about it goes to intent. Unless, of course, you also agree that the following is a lie: : "Wow, there's  a shocker. Covering up for the wayward son." Or was this just a falsehood?

It was neither. It was sarcasm and fake vituperation.

[Tug]

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Because.....

 

Trump's son was being investigated for drugs, tax crime, gun crime, possible sex trafficking, and influence peddling?

Jee maybe he sure looks like and acts like he puts on the old nose bag but hey I’d be looking at jarrod and ivanka walking away with a cool 2 billion now that’s interesting ???? anyway it all looks like an act of desperation on the gops part and Fox News shouldent be allowed as a source they just had to pay 800 million for fake news 

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

It was neither. It was sarcasm and fake vituperation.

While, "There's a shocker" was sarcasm, explain how the separate sentence "Covering up for a wayward son." works as sarcasm. And given your follow-up comments, you're going to have to do some exceptionally gymnastic wriggling to get out of this one.

[bamnutsak]

He attended his daughter's wedding!

 

OK, this is the scandal of the century.

 

 https://www.whitehouse.gov/voluntary-disclosure/

 

The White House will not release access records related to purely personal guests of the First and Second Families (i.e., visits that do not involve any official or political business).

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/disclosures/visitor-logs/

 

 

[heybruce]

35 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Except that they WERE logged under Obama, when Joe was VP (at least some of the time).  So Joe's "most transparent administration" is patently a lie.

Really?  Please show evidence that Malia and Sasha Obama had to sign the White House visitor log when they visited their father.

[placeholder]

4 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Really?  Please show evidence that Malia and Sasha Obama had to sign the White House visitor log when they visited their father.

Well, I've thought about Hanuguma's comments  and does the White House log policy all by itself mean that the Administration isn't the most transparent administration? Is the White House log the be-all and end-all when it comes to transparency?

[pomchop]

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

...and what exactly does this have to do with Hunter Biden being excluded from the White House visitor logs?  

You have a lot of poison built up there. It's not healthy to obsess about it so much my friend. 

Pointing out the obvious to people who obsess over hunter while not least concerned over the elephant in the room.  

[bamnutsak]

I just have to ask that if, for every 250 anti-Biden articles posted here as topics could we get perhaps one positive article?

 

 

[placeholder]

23 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

...and what exactly does this have to do with Hunter Biden being excluded from the White House visitor logs?  

You have a lot of poison built up there. It's not healthy to obsess about it so much my friend. 

First you offer diagnoses of Biden and now you're applying your no doubt well earned medical skills to diagnosing members.

[Hanaguma]

54 minutes ago, pomchop said:

Pointing out the obvious to people who obsess over hunter while not least concerned over the elephant in the room.  

The elephant being.... the possible corruption of the President himself? And the members of his family who all enriched themselves in a possible influence peddling scheme?

Perhaps you are right, I should focus more on them. 

[billd766]

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The narrative was "Nobody is claiming Joe Biden had any knowledge of, nor has ever been implicated in any way, nor has ever discussed overseas business with his son", so presumably the white house records that showed he DID meet the people we were forced to accept he did not meet is problematic. 

 I suspect we are about to see the left suddenly pivot away from JB and toward Newsom. The situation is untenable. Seeing KJP getting humiliated when she was faced with the lies was toe curling. This can not continue. I'm watching the Krassenstein/Pakman/TYT/brooklyndad accounts to see when this pivot occurs.

I am happy for you that you are so interested in this subject,

 

Meanwhile I, and probably most of the rest of the world, are getting on with real life and the daily challenges rather than fantasising about one person.

[SunnyinBangrak]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

I am happy for you that you are so interested in this subject,

 

Meanwhile I, and probably most of the rest of the world, are getting on with real life and the daily challenges rather than fantasising about one person.

If you don't want me discussing the topic of this thread on the thread designated to discus it, what are we supposed to be talking about? Maybe the 2 people that liked your post could answer?