Jump to content



Hunter Biden: Plea deal for president's son collapses in dramatic court hearing


Social Media

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, BenStark said:

Slowly, step by step we will get there,

 

You remember the laptop was also not Hunters, after it was clear it indeed was his laptop, it was loaded by the Russians.

 

What is the current situation on the laptop?

This ruling is rare & historic!

The court wouldnt rubber stamp a plea deal between defense and Doj that gave Hunter immunity from future prosecution!

Going forward after watching all of the proceedings involving the two IRS investigators  and their credible testimony involving the doj hindering the IRS attempts at inquiry , I think there is no trusting the govt to investigate it self!

That being said,after they interview Devon Archer a

Impeachment inquiry with witnesses, cross examination, testimony from IRS and others, hunters emails & graphics from the laptop .joes videos denying his awareness of his son business dealings!  All of this put

in front of the people for them to decide!imop

 

 

 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe caught in another lie during one of the 2020 debates,  he said

“my son has not made money in terms of this thing about - what are you talking about China”

https://news.yahoo.com/nothing-unethical-biden-responds-questions-021413362.html

 

Under questioning during the trial yesterday Hunter confirmed  he received $664,000 from CEFC China Pg 28. Court transcripts.

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2023/07/23cr274MN0726233444.pdf

 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

classic disinformation. Your linked article starts with this paragraph which can only be purposely misleading - unless the author is genuinely uninformed but then he would not have been tasked to write an article in the first place. 

 

"President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden has been an ongoing obsession of former President Donald Trump and conspiracy theorists in the right-wing media. Trump has railed against what he calls the "Biden crime family" relentlessly, and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-California) has said that an "impeachment inquiry" is a possibility."

 

The problem is clear. The "Biden crime family" does not mean Hunter Biden.

The "impeachment inquiry" is not to impeach Hunter. It is to impeach Joe Biden.

After understanding how the author misleads by making 2 false claims in the opening paragraph there is no point in continuing.

 

 People need better sources for their news on the biden corruption. Using any media that called the laptop Russian disinfo for years is not going to inform you of the facts.

When it comes to 46,Young biden is a walking treasure trove of facts , figures and incriminating statements imop

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Even if that is the extent of it, it shows clearly that Biden was lying when he repeatedly said, "my son and I never discussed anything about his business".  And also why lately the story from the White House press office has changed the narrative to "never was in business with Hunter".

Sounds very much like semantics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Did you miss the bank records, emails, texts, photos and witness testimony from involved insiders? And the 2 IRS agents saying the investigation was OBSTRUCTED by bidens DOJ.

 

If you can account for why the bidens were paid at least $17 MILLION by foreign adversaries we are all ears. Otherwise stop insulting our intelligence.

Do explain how all this "evidence" in any way incriminates President Biden.

 

Regarding the money, it's been explained to you many times why a system accustomed to corruptly influencing leaders could easily be duped.   You either have a very short memory or are in denial.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I am factually correct. If you dispute anything in my post then please adress ot rather than making personal slurs.

Well, for one thing there your claim about bank records is there any evidence at all that Joe Biden received a single cent from Hunter Biden's business dealings?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Did you miss the bank records, emails, texts, photos and witness testimony from involved insiders? And the 2 IRS agents saying the investigation was OBSTRUCTED by bidens DOJ.

 

If you can account for why the bidens were paid at least $17 MILLION by foreign adversaries we are all ears. Otherwise stop insulting our intelligence.

The FBI would like to speak to at least one of those agents.What's that about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Yes. They had shared a bank account and more. A nice summary of several specific transactions are to be found here. 

 

Joe Biden could become target in FBI Hunter probe https://mol.im/a/10070093

According to the article they shared bank accounts and paid each other's bills. This is your idea of criminal evidence? Should they plead guilty to holding a joint bank account? It is to laugh.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BenStark said:

It usually takes long time to complete an investigation, when someone with the power at the top, is obstructing it.

Precisely the opposite of the argument the right made when the previous guy was being investigated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, heybruce said:

If the DOJ, FBI and DHS under both Trump and Biden could not find grounds to bring Hunter to trial, and now the House is making noise but also not finding sufficient grounds, then perhaps there is no there there.  The fact that you ignore that reality is why your answer is a vague non-answer.

Never mind no there there or no here here. You continually ignore the probability that the "grounds" have been slow to emerge due to obstruction, slow-walking and lack of action by the DOJ, whether under Trump or Biden. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Never mind no there there or no here here. You continually ignore the probability that the "grounds" have been slow to emerge due to obstruction, slow-walking and lack of action by the DOJ, whether under Trump or Biden. 

What obstruction and where is your evidence for it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.