Jump to content

Pareena Acquitted: Court Drops False Asset Declaration Charges


webfact

Recommended Posts

The first item she was accused of seems peculiar (but perhaps I simply don't understand).

 

Turns out she over-declared her assets, rather than under-declaring as one might expect. Why would anyone bother to pursue her for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2baht said:

Saved! :jap:

Saved from an inactive post unlike the 25 cops that were at the Kaman dinner where he had one of there own blasted into smithereens.They have been transfered to the "Royal Thai Police Operations Center" Where is this building located? It most must be huge.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened with the army promises to root out your bad apple immigration guys, on the border? They likely let in thousands, to line their greedy pockets, during covid. A question to Sretta. Do you care at all, on any level, about anything other than your own enrichment, and the vintage of ridiculously expensive champagne you will have this evening?

 

There is no saying the extent of the corruption in this new administration, but the army and the PT are not exactly known for integrity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

 

On Friday (Sept 8), the Supreme Court dismissed charges against Ms. Pareena Kraikupt, a former Member of Parliament (MP) from Ratchaburi, representing the Palang Pracharat Party.

 

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) had accused her of intentionally submitting a false statement of assets and liabilities, reported Sanook.

 

The NACC alleged that Pareena included a loan agreement in her asset declaration, even though she had no rights to the mentioned contract, and concealed the possession of sacred amulets.

 

The court found that Pareena had no malicious intent when she listed the loan agreement. The contract was the result of Mr. P. requesting campaign funding from Pariyana. In exchange, she gave money but took land title deeds as collateral, expecting Mr. P. to repay her later with a loan agreement. Pareena genuinely believed she had rights to the loan agreement due to this understanding.

 

Regarding the sacred amulets mentioned in her assets, the court ruled that Pareena had no intent to deceive. An average person without expertise or knowledge about sacred amulets might not discern their real value or authenticity.

 

-- ASEAN NOW 2023-09-09

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get your business in front of millions of customers who read ASEAN NOW with an interest in Thailand every month - email [email protected] for more information

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

You do know who my husband is don't you?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

What ever happened with the army promises to root out your bad apple immigration guys, on the border? They likely let in thousands, to line their greedy pockets, during covid. A question to Sretta. Do you care at all, on any level, about anything other than your own enrichment, and the vintage of ridiculously expensive champagne you will have this evening?

 

There is no saying the extent of the corruption in this new administration, but the army and the PT are not exactly known for integrity.

Let's not forget immigration police fleet of Smart BMW cars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...