Jump to content

Thai gov. to tax (remitted) income from abroad for tax residents starting 2024 - Part I


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, ukrules said:

Correct - there's a lot of hysteria and absolute nonsense about CRS being circulated by people who obviously know absolutely nothing about it i and I'm seeing a lot of it in this thread.

 

Correct but it does not help that transactions are not being circulated. CRS report will show your CUMMULATED revenue i.e. you trade 1000times 10.000 USD and it will show 10 Million USD revenue. So you can imagine that this will not be to your benefit whilst discussing this "huge wealth" with any tax inspector who does not understand the difference between revenue and profit.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Middle Aged Grouch said:

Why all the bother ? Just start looking to move to Vietnam or Cambodia or Malaysia, the Philippines, or even India...

Yeah great idea to move to the The Socialist Republic of VietNam. If you spend 5 secs online search you would know that you are taxed there much worse then in Thailand. Spoiler alert, if you do not want to spend the 5 secs just read out aloud the part of the name that starts with an s.

Edited by stat
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ricardo said:

Actually, I may have to take that back, as I just saw a recent list of countries which say they're reporting under CRS, but I would still take that with a very large pinch-of-salt ! 

 

Offshore banking-centres would IMO only give the most sketchy/basic information, that they can get away with.  It's simply not in their interest to do more.  And how much time/expertise/desire the RD would have, to deal with such a mass of information, well I still have my doubts.

 

Colour me cynical.  ????

 

 

I colour you clueless sorry no offense. The name gives it already away "Common Reporting Standard" it is exactly this. No country (besides the US) can just make the report up as they wish. I agree that the RD currently can make next to nothing out of these reports but in 5-10 years they can and maybe come back with a bill for the last years including fines and interest.

Edited by stat
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

IMO there are only three viable countries for most Expats - Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia. Those with more 'wealth' would also have Singapore on their list (probably first).

Malaysia and Philippines yes, Indonesia no (taxes on worldwide cap gains even if not remitted)

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(US) TAXATION CONVENTION WITH THAILAND

ARTICLE 24
Other Income

 

2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to income, other than income from immovable property as defined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 (Income from Immovable (Real) Property), if the beneficial owner of the income, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business in the other Contracting State through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the right or property in respect of which the income is paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of Article 7 (Business Profits) or Article 15 (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply.

****************

 

Now I could see where -- if there is to be disagreement between an expat resident and the ThaiRevDept -- given the documentation likely required to take advantage of this article/paragraph.

 

But these kind of complex arcane questions are likely not to involve the run of the mill persons on pensions or social security who are unlikely at best to end up in a tax court in Thailand over DTA disagreements.

Edited by jerrymahoney
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Arkady said:

Interesting but no mention of the potential impact on the condo market,

Actually, the article you mention addresses the impact on FDI, which includes condos, and buyers who have lived here a long time, but who bring purchase money in from abroad. BoI, a major player in Thai economic guidance, is the personal protector of FDI, a major player in economic growth -- so I doubt they'll allow things to go forward as now presented.

 

If they just got rid of the "remittance" aspect of all of this, and just concentrated on income earned abroad, regardless of remittance, then things could be workable. CRS and FATCA reporting aren't going to show remittance; heck, all my taxable income is direct deposited into my US savings account, from which Wise sucks it out for transfer to Bangkok Bank, mixed with five years of previous income and non income (inheritance), to become a mass of fungible dollars -- how is FATCA (or CRS) going to trace that as identifiable income? They can't (at least for now -- AI may be down the road. Barf).

 

Anyway, there are too many loose elements with this new proposal for it to go forward  -- not the least of which is torpedoing FDI, to include condos.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of the posts here pertain to specific situations of either US, UK or Australian citizens. Because this is an English speaking forum and because these states have somewhat peculiar rules (example: every US citizen must pay tax in the US regardless of his home-adress etc.). And therefore the specific DTA come as well into play.

 

But there are other states and retirees from other countries. Example (fictous): A citizen of Sweden has lived his whole life in South Korea and is now retired. He is entitled to a state pension (not government pension) from Korea directly payable to a bank account in Thailand. The money is transferred directly every month from a Financial Department of Korea into the account.

 

The Swedish citizen has a passport still valid some years and has never lived in Sweden. He will have his next and first contact with his embassy in Thailand when he applies for a next passport. So, if there were DTA between Sweden, Korea and Thailand in place they would not have any significance for him since he is neither tax resident in Sweden althought he has a Swedish passport nor Korea because he does not live there anymore. But he has been more than 180 days in Thailand and did and does receive the Korean Pension remitted directly.

 

What would be the best approach to get the maximum out of it or to prevent even possible harm ? I am not sure if the CRS would more confuse than clarify. The Thai RD would maybe inform Korea where he is neither registered nor tax resident. Or Sweden where he is neither registered nor tax resident either. Korea would probably inform Thailand. Both know of course the name and the bank- and acccount number as well as the living adress (not the RD, but the immigration) . The Swedish guy has no tax number by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MartinBangkok said:

I have abandoned my plan to buy the new BMW 5 series (approximately 3,6 million Baht, including about 1,6 million directly injected to Thailand's state coffers in form of total import fees). Plus VAT.

 

Instead I am contemplating selling my new Ford Raptor (V6 400hp) and my 1 year old 1100 cc Honda big bike (only to a Farang who can pay me outside of Thai banking system).

 

Next step: Finding another more appreciating/ welcoming country to live in.

 

Who looses? Thailand or me?

 

Cheers

 

Good luck getting your money back, you will ultimately lose on those resells.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, moogradod said:

Many of the posts here pertain to specific situations of either US, UK or Australian citizens. Because this is an English speaking forum and because these states have somewhat peculiar rules (example: every US citizen must pay tax in the US regardless of his home-adress etc.). And therefore the specific DTA come as well into play.

 

But there are other states and retirees from other countries. Example (fictous): A citizen of Sweden has lived his whole life in South Korea and is now retired. He is entitled to a state pension (not government pension) from Korea directly payable to a bank account in Thailand. The money is transferred directly every month from a Financial Department of Korea into the account.

 

The Swedish citizen has a passport still valid some years and has never lived in Sweden. He will have his next and first contact with his embassy in Thailand when he applies for a next passport. So, if there were DTA between Sweden, Korea and Thailand in place they would not have any significance for him since he is neither tax resident in Sweden althought he has a Swedish passport nor Korea because he does not live there anymore. But he has been more than 180 days in Thailand and did and does receive the Korean Pension remitted directly.

 

What would be the best approach to get the maximum out of it or to prevent even possible harm ? I am not sure if the CRS would more confuse than clarify. The Thai RD would maybe inform Korea where he is neither registered nor tax resident. Or Sweden where he is neither registered nor tax resident either. Korea would probably inform Thailand. Both know of course the name and the bank- and acccount number as well as the living adress (not the RD, but the immigration) . The Swedish guy has no tax number by the way.

For CRS there is nothing to do.

 

Pension.

 

Is this a govt or private pension? because there is an article in the DTA between Korea and Thailand covering pensions.

 

Is Korea deducting tax off the pension?

Edited by freeworld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bdenner said:

I posted early in this thread and not read it all - forgive me:-

Many years ogo I loaned my Thai brother in law 100 K Baht to get employment in Taiwan in tyre manufacturing business.

4 years down the track he sent everything he could back to his wife, paying me back and setting up a nice nest egg for his wife & kids.

Does this government intend to levy a TAX on the wives of these responsible, hard working Thai's earning a future for their families?

Theoretically if hes working in Taiwan he should be paying tax there so the money he is remitting to Thailand is savings and would not be subject to reporting and tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Antti said:

The Elite Visa program was rebranded as Thai Privilege Visa and relaunched 1st of October. On the website in the FAQ section it says:

 

Do I have to pay income taxes in Thailand as a Thai Privilege visa holder?

The Thai Privilege Visa is a privilege visa which falls under the special tourist visa or privilege entry category. The Thai Privilege Visa holder does not need to pay income taxes especially when the income was derived abroad. There are instances where a Thai Privilege Visa holder may voluntarily pay income tax in Thailand.

 

This is promising but of course an official statement from the tax department is needed. I'd assume the same rules would apply to people who have Elite Visa.

In the FAQ of the official website there is no mention of this. Your above quote was posted on 3rd party Elite visa websites which look official but are just sale agencies. It's validity was discussed here but not confirmed.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leemeshi said:

In the FAQ of the official website there is no mention of this. Your above quote was posted on 3rd party Elite visa websites which look official but are just sale agencies. It's validity was discussed here but not confirmed.

Ah ok, thanks for pointing that out. Hopefully it will be clarified soon. Can't imagine there are many buyers for the Privilege visa before that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...