Jump to content

Fury grows over Tory visa rules where ‘only the rich’ dare fall in love


CharlieH

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

 No  that wasn't what I meant 

 I do think that he was referring to the constant accusations of racism and he didn't literally mean screaming . 

   You avoided the racism accusation and concentrated on the screaming bit 

 

The easiest way to refute an accusation of racism is to tackle it head on. 

 

So when I suggest that a statement has racist undertones, show me where I am wrong and/or how the statement might be interpreted differently. Pointing out that tourists in Thailand are st to discriminatory pricing does not do that.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2023 at 11:38 AM, TigerandDog said:

So 2  brits can marry each other and live in the UK, even if they earn less than 38.7k quid, BUT a brit can't marry a foreigner and bring her to the UK if they earn less than that. Absolute hypocrisy & racism at it's best.

Absolute garbage at its best.  Britons can marry even if they have zero income or rely solely on state benefits.   This has nothing whatsoever to do with marriage, per se, or who can marry whom, it is only about allowing foreigners into Britain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

Your first response was " In other words, you've got nothing.". Not an analysis.

 

You subsequent response to me was an opinion. 

 

 

I got news for you. Opinions don't have to be empty. They can be supported by reasoning. As in this case:

"I didn't have to. JonnyF showed he had nothing by refusing to engage with the points that RayC raised. Given his inclination to make persona comments, it was especially amusing to see him claim that his reason for retiring from the field was that he took offense."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

 No  that wasn't what I meant 

 I do think that he was referring to the constant accusations of racism and he didn't literally mean screaming . 

   You avoided the racism accusation and concentrated on the screaming bit 

Now it's essentially a handful of prolific posters screaming racist at everyone they disagree with and liking each others posts."

Maybe this strikes you as being thoughtful and cogent. Me, not so much.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Now it's essentially a handful of prolific posters screaming racist at everyone they disagree with and liking each others posts."

Maybe this strikes you as being thoughtful and cogent. Me, not so much.

 

   I haven't yet stated that how strikes me , we weren't talking how stuck I was .

Its clear to me though that the emphasis was in the racist accusations 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   I haven't yet stated that how strikes me , we weren't talking how stuck I was .

Its clear to me though that the emphasis was in the racist accusations 

 

Do I really have to point out how nonsensical his claim is? He claims that no matter what the disagreement is about,  a handful of posters scream racist. This is just plain over-the-top nuts. It's certainly not the kind of language that reflects rational thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Prove they are a genuine asylum seeker.

 

My friend in the UK used to process asylum claims, herself a one time illegal immigrant who knew all the stories, loopholes and lies. According to her 95% of asylum claims are fake.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, proton said:

 

My friend in the UK used to process asylum claims, herself a one time illegal immigrant who knew all the stories, loopholes and lies. According to her 95% of asylum claims are fake.

 

That'll be why 75% of asylum applications are approved at the initial stage🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, proton said:

 

My friend in the UK used to process asylum claims, herself a one time illegal immigrant who knew all the stories, loopholes and lies. According to her 95% of asylum claims are fake.

 

One person who " used to process asylum claims". She must have worked very hard to have checked all of them.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

24% was in response you your "most". Perfectly relevant.

 

You seem to have trouble with reading.

 

I said the other parts weren't relevant to MY response; I wasn't responding to your 24% data, so I didn't quote it.

 

I wasn't referring to YOUR response to my previous post, lol

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:

 

You seem to have trouble with reading.

 

I said the other parts weren't relevant to MY response; I wasn't responding to your 24% data, so I didn't quote it.

 

I wasn't referring to YOUR response to my previous post, lol

 

 

It's called conversation. You'll get it one day, but probably not if the conversation goes against your, incorrect, beliefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, youreavinalaff said:

I'll explain once more.

 

24% is not "most". That is incorrect. It is one of your beliefs.

 

Off you trot and show some data to back this up.

 

By the way, Albanians are now number 1 for asylum in the UK. What would Albanians need to seek asylum from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Off you trot and show some data to back this up.

 

By the way, Albanians are now number 1 for asylum in the UK. What would Albanians need to seek asylum from?

You have no data to backup your claim but expect others to back theirs up 

May happen after you have backed up yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did find this interesting:

 

- 98% of asylum seekers don't carry identification documents.

 

You'd think they'd want to make their asylum claim easier with some form of ID, rather than making it difficult to identify them.

 

- 90% are male. Why is that? Lol

 

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/press-release/668

 

Emphasis on the heading: Nearly 90% of those crossing in boats from safe countries are male

 

Why are they coming to the UK from safe countries to claim asylum? Lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Most of them can't prove that

 

52 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:

 

I am stating opinions, not facts. I don't have to back up my opinions.

You were stating facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...