Jump to content

Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure: pharmacological mechanisms


connda

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, connda said:

I have just read the full article and am satisfied that good procedures have been followed.

There is now a big question mark left hanging over the general use of statins for seemingly otherwise healthy individuals.

In the article, emphasis was placed on the independence of the scientists. 

Pharmaceutical companies go to great lengths to promote their products and I have reason to believe hospitals and doctors are far from independent from their influence.

We may not be in much mortal danger from from unnecessary use of statins but the reasons for having them prescribed may probably also include financial gain.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, connda said:

Well this sucks. 
This recent research infers that the Statins people take for high cholesterol may in fact be responsible for creating the conditions for coronary artery calcification.

The bad news:
Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure: pharmacological mechanisms
In contrast to the current belief that cholesterol reduction with statins decreases
atherosclerosis, we present a perspective that statins may be causative in coronary artery
calcification and can function as mitochondrial toxins that impair muscle function in the heart
and blood vessels through the depletion of coenzyme Q10 and ‘heme A’, and thereby ATP
generation. Statins inhibit the synthesis of vitamin K2, the cofactor for matrix Gla-protein
activation, which in turn protects arteries from calcification. Statins inhibit the biosynthesis of
selenium containing proteins, one of which is glutathione peroxidase serving to suppress
peroxidative stress. An impairment of selenoprotein biosynthesis may be a factor in congestive
heart failure, reminiscent of the dilated cardiomyopathies seen with selenium deficiency.
Thus, the epidemic of heart failure and atherosclerosis that plagues the modern world may
paradoxically be aggravated by the pervasive use of statin drugs. We propose that current
statin treatment guidelines be critically reevaluated

https://cardiacos.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2015-Statins-stimulate-atherosclerosis-and-heart-failure-pharmacological-mechanisms.pdf

The good news?  There are ways to mitigate the damage.  Happy reading.

Guess I am screwed, been on Statins for about twenty years 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having been diagnosed with high cholesterol and put on a special diet, it was decided that, unfortunately, I am one of those people whose body manufactures too much cholesterol, regardless of diet. I was therefore put on Simvastatin which has successfully controlled my cholesterol for MORE THAN 30 YEARS!

About 10 years ago, having read some bad press regarding statins, not dissimilar to the content in this thread, I visited my GP, expressing my concerns. Her reply to me was "What do you want to die of!"

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Luuk Chaai said:

Negative .....    Fibre is not needed for a proper Human Diet

                         Statins are not your friend   

                          The entire carb / grain / veggie  sugar (don't forget the poison seed oils )  are part of the Kellog's / Morman bought and paid for lie

 

                          Human's thrive on carnivorous diets  "Saturated fat's " are your real friend .. eat beef !

                          Start out with BBBB  (0" carbs ) Beef Butter Bacon Eggs for 60 days ..  then go get your bloodwork rechecked

                          Amazing.  how getting back to nature heals the body 

                           

come back to the table in a few years when the toxins have built up and you're sick

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tandor said:

Thais eat a wide range of fruits all year round, and if not incorporated in their main dish it is always offered as a dessert.

Mr. Google says this:   The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in Thailand is low when compared with other countries. It is the third in frequency in males after liver and bile duct and lung cancers, and the fifth after cancers of the cervix, breast, liver and bile duct and lung for females.

2nd in 2021, 19% for males. Some thais may eat a range of fruit and veg but many are happy with rice and meat

 

https://www.nci.go.th/th/cancer_record/cancer_rec1.html

Screenshot_2023-12-19-14-07-11-272_com.android.chrome.jpg

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Luuk Chaai said:

Negative .....    Fibre is not needed for a proper Human Diet

                         Statins are not your friend   

                          The entire carb / grain / veggie  sugar (don't forget the poison seed oils )  are part of the Kellog's / Morman bought and paid for lie

 

                          Human's thrive on carnivorous diets  "Saturated fat's " are your real friend .. eat beef !

                          Start out with BBBB  (0" carbs ) Beef Butter Bacon Eggs for 60 days ..  then go get your bloodwork rechecked

                          Amazing.  how getting back to nature heals the body .

                           

So, eating vegetables (home grown) isn't "getting back to nature" on your planet then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 years ago in Thailand I went for a full check up at the local hospital.

All was ok but my bad cholesterol was just above the safe zone so doc put me on statins for 3 months.

On return the doctor was very pleased with the result.

I wasn't happy though. I'd read articles advising caution with statin use. 

I stopped forthwith and am relatively fit for age.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, newnative said:

My reading on the CAC test was 433, which is considered very high.  Zero to 100 is the normal range.  I've since had an MRI, which indicated my heart arteries have blockages but are not severe enough to need stents at this point. 

Was this advice in Thailand? Good to hear if Thailand they weren't doing a sales job for stents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 5davidhen1 said:

Having been diagnosed with high cholesterol and put on a special diet, it was decided that, unfortunately, I am one of those people whose body manufactures too much cholesterol, regardless of diet. I was therefore put on Simvastatin which has successfully controlled my cholesterol for MORE THAN 30 YEARS!

About 10 years ago, having read some bad press regarding statins, not dissimilar to the content in this thread, I visited my GP, expressing my concerns. Her reply to me was "What do you want to die of!"

 

Therein lies the rub!

I had high cholesterol and high BP which, stupidly, I basically ignored. Then I had a heart attack!

Now I'm on a Statin and several BP-reducing meds.  I get a blood test every year confirming that the meds are working, and not causing any bad effects to my liver, kidneys etc.

 

So my (possible) dilemma is do I stop taking the meds and risk another attack, or carry on and risk....something else????

As medical science advances, today's cures are sometimes discovered to cause more harm than good - as others have said this article says

 

".............we present a perspective that statins may be causative in coronary artery calcification........"

 

@Sheryl you confirmed it needs further study but what did you mean by your comment "Statin use by people who do not have CAD is more controversial especially for borderline lipid levels."?

And is the source of the OP considered to be reliable, would you say?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Sheryl said:

I meant that use by people who do NOT have coronary artery disease is of less clear benefit. You DO have CAD and there is no question but that you should continue the prescribed statins. 

 

The source is a peer-reviewed journal. However the authors repeatedly stress that this is a hypothesis of what may  be the case.  It is a controversial article.

 

 

Yes, there seems to be a big difference between statin use for folks with CAD and those without.

 

Coincidentally I just watched a YouTube video where Dr Andrew Huberman chats with Dr Robert Lustig. At one point Lustig says that studies show the average life expectancy increase for those without CAD who use statins vs those who don't is.......4 days.

 

Seems hardly worth it, except for shareholders of Big Pharma stocks.

 

So much research has been done in the last few years about cholesterol, and the 'accepted wisdom' has been turned on its head. Very little cholesterol results from diet, and most results from genetics. Also, there's no 'good' and 'bad' cholesterol, at least along the lines of the simple LDL/VLDL/HDL measures usually reported in typical bloodwork. It's ApoB that is key.

 

There also seems to be a negative correlation between very low cholesterol and cancer. Plus, most people do not know what cholesterol does and might be surprised to know both its function and that absent cholesterol, life expectancy is a billionth of a second (or less).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sheryl said:

I meant that use by people who do NOT have coronary artery disease is of less clear benefit. You DO have CAD and there is no question but that you should continue the prescribed statins. 

 

The source is a peer-reviewed journal. However the authors repeatedly stress that this is a hypothesis of what may  be the case.  It is a controversial article.

 

Thank you - all very clear. 👍

 

Tbh, there's no way I'd alter my prescribed meds without consulting my GP / specialist. But I do think it behoves anyone with any medical condition to keep up to date on developments from reliable sources and then ask the pertinent questions. Had I been a little more assiduous 5 years ago, I may not  have had the attack at all 🙄

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2023 at 9:14 AM, CanadaSam said:

I am amazed at the prevalence of meat in the Thai diet, it seems that everywhere, everyone eats loads of pork, chicken, and very little veggies, IMO.

Where do you live? I find Thai food very low on proteins. Contains plenty of offal and skin though.

 

Anyway, only one third of blood cholesterol comes from the diet. The rest gets manufactured by the liver. Dieting can lower cholesterol only slightly.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...