Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Federal Jury Orders Donald Trump to Pay $83.3 Million in Defamation Case

Featured Replies

Judge Kaplan just entered an order on Trump payment of $83.3M

'That starts the clock for Trump's post-trial motions and for him to post a bond'.

 

'Specifically, federal rules governing civil cases stay a plaintiff's execution on a judgment for 30 days after the entry of judgment, which effectively means he has 30 days to provide a bond or other security to lengthen that stay pending an appeal," Rubin continued.

'Trump also has 28 days after the entry of judgment to move for a new trial or to 'alter or amend' the judgment.'

 

'That starts the clock': E. Jean Carroll judge just entered an order on Trump payment 
 

Docket for Judge Kaplan's Judgement Case Carroll vs Trump 1:20-cv-07311

Edited by LosLobo

  • Replies 590
  • Views 25k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • thaibeachlovers
    thaibeachlovers

    If ever proof was needed that the US "justice system" is a very bad joke, this is it. If it was anyone but Trump would the penalty be as large?

  • Did you hear that?  That was the sound of Trump support going up yet again.  Because the American voters recognize this for what it is.  Except, of course, those with TDS.

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    My coffee tastes unusually good this morning.

Posted Images

On 2/8/2024 at 8:16 AM, Danderman123 said:

Yes, this is not the long awaited appeal of the first verdict.

But here is the docket for it:

 

Trump’s appeal for last year's court case filed 20th Nov 2023.

 

This doesn't appear to have been posted before, though it seems to have been available for some time.

And an appeal for Trump's right-to- alibi et alia has been referred to many times in discussion since.

 

Last's year's verdict by a jury of Trump's peers with a preponderance of evidence is water-under-the bridge for most, but for Trump and supporters it is still a bridge-too-far.

 

It’s important to note that this is a legal document prepared by Trump’s legal team, and the arguments presented in it represent their perspective on the case and are not established facts. They are made by one side in this legal dispute and will be subject to scrutiny and counterarguments from the other side in the course of the legal proceedings.

 

Summary of Trump's reasons for the appeal argument (followed by the docket of Trump's brief):

 

1) The district court allowed two other women to testify that President Trump had sexually assaulted them in the past, even though their stories were very different from Plaintiff’s and happened a long time ago. This was unfair and prejudicial because it made the jury think that President Trump had a habit of assaulting women.
 

2) The district court also allowed a recording of President Trump talking about grabbing women’s genitals to be played to the jury, even though it had nothing to do with Plaintiff’s allegation and was not a confession of any crime. This was also unfair and prejudicial because it made the jury dislike President Trump and believe he was capable of assaulting Plaintiff.
 

3) The district court prevented President Trump from presenting evidence and questioning witnesses that could have shown that Plaintiff was lying and had a political motive to sue him. For example, the court did not let President Trump show that Plaintiff was funded by a billionaire who opposed him, that Plaintiff coached another witness to change her story, and that Plaintiff lied about having President Trump’s DNA on her dress.
 

4) The district court’s errors were not harmless but affected the outcome of the trial. Plaintiff’s lawyers emphasized the wrongly admitted evidence and the court did not give proper instructions to the jury. President Trump was not able to defend himself effectively and the jury was influenced by the errors. Therefore, the verdict should be vacated and a new trial should be ordered.
 

Case 23-793, Document 74, 11/20/2023 23-0793-cv

Brief For Defendant-Appellant

Just-Security-Trump-brief-in-his-2nd-Cir.-appeal-of-district-court-order-denying-a-retrial-following-jury-verdict-in-Carroll-II-Nov.-20-2024.pdf (justsecurity.org)

And the Carroll response to the above is due 20 March, 2024

Well I wasn't prepared to start posing this kind of stuff myself because if *I* were the one who posted it, I would surely be under cross-examination from the usual suspects.

4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Is this for the first or second verdict?

First verdict  Carroll II. NY State Adult Victims trial.

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

First verdict  Carroll II. NY State Adult Victims trial.

I believe that Trump has posted bond for this appeal, so there is no financial benefit from a delay. They seem to just need more time.

15 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I believe that Trump has posted bond for this appeal, so there is no financial benefit from a delay. They seem to just need more time.

Carroll side has requested the delay to respond to the Trump brief posted already.

 

Just to note from last year's verdict:

 

E. Jean Carroll lawyer says Trump has ‘absolutely zero’ grounds for appeal
 05/10/23 1:27 PM ET

 

E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan said Wednesday that former President Trump has “absolutely zero” grounds for an appeal after a jury found that he defamed Carroll and is liable for sexual abuse of her.

 

“Judge Kaplan is one of the most-respected, fairest judges,” she told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “Good Morning America.” “He gave them more process than even anyone else ever gets. He gave Donald Trump multiple chances to come to that courtroom and testify. He refused to do so. He has no appeal.”

 

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3997968-e-jean-carroll-lawyer-says-trump-has-absolutely-zero-grounds-for-appeal/

Edited by jerrymahoney

When does Trump have to file an appeal for the second verdict?

10 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

When does Trump have to file an appeal for the second verdict?

30 days from the 8 FEB 2024 Judge Kaplan Judgment and, as best I can tell, he hasn't filed yet.

  • 2 weeks later...
12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump tells E. Jean Carroll judge he's too rich to have to pay bond

 

I still believe Trump won't appeal this second verdict.

Agreed, he's banking on the appeal to the first case invalidating the second verdict.

On 2/17/2024 at 9:24 PM, jerrymahoney said:

30 days from the 8 FEB 2024 Judge Kaplan Judgment and, as best I can tell, he hasn't filed yet.

One more week to go, and Trump still hasn't filed his appeal.

 

 

'It's brutal': Shock and awe follows E. Jean Carroll's court response to Trump

 

E. Jean Carroll's lawyer on Thursday shot back at Donald Trump's request for a pause in paying his court fines after a jury awarded her over $88 million in two defamation cases — and onlookers said she didn't hold back.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

This just in: Trump's appeal of the 83.3 million dollar judgement has been rejected. Kind of got lost amongst all the other Trump legal matters. I wonder if he's tired of all the winning yet.

 

https://www.axios.com/2024/04/25/trumps-appeal-e-jean-carroll-rejected

To maybe clarify a bit, what was rejected was a motion with the original trial Judge Lewis Kaplan for a new trial for the defamation-only case. Team Trump has yet to file an appeal brief with the NY State Appellate Court on this matter after posting the $90 million Chubb bond

 

The appeal on the sexual assault/defamation case verdict with the $5 million bond paid by Trump in cash is well underway with the NY State Appellate Court. Trump submitted a brief in NOV 2023. Team Carroll filed a reply last month APR. Trump (rebuttal) brief is due next month MAY.

Edited by jerrymahoney

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update to Carroll v Trump sexual assault verdict appeal, the appeals court has denied a motion by Carroll for expedited decision:

 

Plaintiff (Carroll) has not established good cause to expedite oral argument in this appeal. This appeal does not fall within a category of cases subject to automatic placement on the expedited appeals calendar. Any future attempt to postpone the argument once scheduled would require a showing of “extraordinary circumstances.”

 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s (Carroll) motion is DENIED, and argument in this appeal shall be scheduled in the ordinary course.

 

24 MAY 2024

And just to expand on the above, one reason that Team Carroll wanted to expedite any oral hearing is that she is 80 years old and should not have to endure unnecessary delay.

 

Team Trump replied, what's the big hurry now? You waited about 23 years before filing any claim.

 

And as above: Motion (by Carroll) DENIED

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.