Jump to content

Air Force Seeks 19 Billion Baht In Funding For New Fighters


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg

 

THE AIR FORCE IS LOOKING FOR a sum of 19 billion baht in funding for next fiscal year for the planned procurement of new squadrons of fighters to replace the ageing ones scheduled to be decommissioned in the next four years, air force chief ACM Panpakdee Patanakul confirmed today (Jan.30).

 

The air force would largely prefer to buy either Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70 Fighting Falcon or Saab JAS 39 Gripen jets to replace General Dynamics F-16s and Northrop F-5TH Super Tigris jets, according to the air force chief.

 

Pivotal to the air force’s ultimate preference for either type of the sought-after fighters will be the proven cost-effectiveness of those combat aircraft to buy and replace the ageing ones, beginning in 2028, according to the air force chief.

 

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has initially given the green light for the air force’s seeking some 19 billion baht in 2025 funding for the new fighters procurement scheme on grounds that the chosen combat aircraft’s qualities will ultimately be deemed by air marshals as “optimum”, ACM Panpakdee said.

 

By Thai Newsroom Reporters

Top: The Royal Bahraini Air Force took delivery of the first of 16 Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70 fighter jets in March 2023. Photo: Lockheed Martin and published by Breaking Defense

 

Full story: THAI NEWSROOM 2024-01-31

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Join us now!

  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bokningar said:

After the sunk corvette and Thailand's plan to let China in to see the tech in it.

Will anyone sell them any new high tech plane.

Maybe the USA will offer some F-16 A's which are gathering dust somewhere.

Special offer price

Posted
4 hours ago, bokningar said:

After the sunk corvette and Thailand's plan to let China in to see the tech in it.

Will anyone sell them any new high tech plane.

Yes, the Yanks will be super cautious on this one.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Choppers are what they need not bloody fighter jets, choppers can be used for a myriad of purposes. from rescue, to water bombers, and fighting if they should ever need to, which is highly unlikely. 

  • Sad 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

The Swedes could sell Gripens, which are supposed to be good, just without the engines. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
8 hours ago, flyingtlger said:

So where will the money be coming from?

Certainly not from the general public.

Time to increase taxes and make up bogus reasons to tax in incoming tourists and expats.....

Which taxes are "being increased" and how are "bogus reasons" being used to tax incoming tourists and expats? 

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, WHansen said:

Great idea when they have nothing to defend. Toys for the boys

"Toys for the boys"...gawd.     

 

"...they have nothing to defend".

Is Thailand not an entity?

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, brianthainess said:

Choppers are what they need not bloody fighter jets, choppers can be used for a myriad of purposes. from rescue, to water bombers, and fighting if they should ever need to, which is highly unlikely. 

Perhaps their helicopters are not yet due for decommissioning as the planes are.

  • Haha 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Purdey said:

The Swedes could sell Gripens, which are supposed to be good, just without the engines. 

Obviously, they could as the RTAF has had Gripens, with engines, for years.

Posted

Maybe they could have a whip round amongst the generals active and retired. They wouldn't raise the amount required but they would amass a sizeable deposit.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
4 hours ago, mfd101 said:

Yes, the Yanks will be super cautious on this one.

 

The gullibility of the American Foreign Service and military cannot be underestimated. They've allowed Thai officials to spit in their face and give them the cold shoulder while cozying up to China for a decade now. With no repercussions for Thailand. US ambassadors and embassy officials continue to lope around Thailand with their tongues hanging out, begging for every scrap of Thai approval they can get. The US-Thai "alliance" should have been scrapped years ago. And US tech investments should be steered away to places like the Philippines. But I would imagine the US would go through with aircraft sales, even with Chinese co-pilots standing on the tarmac next to the Thai pilots.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Perhaps their helicopters are not yet due for decommissioning as the planes are.

No reason to buy fighter jets instead just have more choppers.

  • Confused 1
Posted

And don't forget that Thailand holds joint air exercises with China called Falcon Strike. Unlike Cobra Gold, where the Chinese have a presence, the US and other Western nations are locked out of Falcon Strike. The US, Australia, Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Indonesia hold separate air exercises. But Thailand opted to go with the Chinese. The US would be nuts to sell Thailand anything more advanced than a fax machine. But, as I say, they're probably gullible enough to do so.

 

 

Quote

Given the sensitivity of the timing, it would certainly have been ideal for Thailand to postpone or cancel the exercise. Thailand has adopted what The Diplomat’s editor-in-chief Shannon Tiezzi has called a “true neutral” position – not swinging in favor of either the U.S. or China and calling on all sides to exercise restraint – in response to the Taiwan crisis. Yet, by engaging in a military drill with the PLAAF so soon after taking a stance of neutrality, Thailand could be seen as sending indirect support to China – a classic case of “actions speak louder than words”

 https://thediplomat.com/2022/08/thailand-china-and-the-revival-of-falcon-strike/

Posted
11 minutes ago, brianthainess said:
1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Perhaps their helicopters are not yet due for decommissioning as the planes are.

No reason to buy fighter jets instead just have more choppers.

What would be your reasoning for suggesting that they spend the money on helicopters instead of planes when they, obviously, cannot do the same jobs?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What would be your reasoning for suggesting that they spend the money on helicopters instead of planes when they, obviously, cannot do the same jobs?

Um, need? usefulness across a range of tasks? probability of a range of tasks actually coming in to play?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Maybe the USA will offer some F-16 A's which are gathering dust somewhere.

Special offer price

My idea is that the French Rafale, second hand, would be perfect for Thailand. While Nato should force France to buy at least 100 F35s. EU countries with Britain should operate at least 500 those.

Edited by Ben Zioner
  • Like 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

The gullibility of the American Foreign Service and military cannot be underestimated. They've allowed Thai officials to spit in their face and give them the cold shoulder while cozying up to China for a decade now. With no repercussions for Thailand. US ambassadors and embassy officials continue to lope around Thailand with their tongues hanging out, begging for every scrap of Thai approval they can get. The US-Thai "alliance" should have been scrapped years ago. And US tech investments should be steered away to places like the Philippines. But I would imagine the US would go through with aircraft sales, even with Chinese co-pilots standing on the tarmac next to the Thai pilots.

So the Yanks really are stupid. Gosh, I hadn't realized.

 

Or perhaps it's just that they try quietly NOT to get in to a competition with the Chinese in every tinpot country but when the chips are down - as with the ridiculous request for 2 F35s - they know how to say NO (ever so politely).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 34

      ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant Over Alleged War Crimes

    2. 14

      Pattaya's Traffic Mayhem Threatens Tourism: City Battles for Solution

    3. 7

      Foreign Man Found Unconscious in Car in Pattaya

    4. 80

      Sleep aid for a long flight

    5. 112

      Europe Braces for Escalation: Germany Mobilizes NATO Troops Amid Putin's Nuclear Threats

    6. 88

      Problem with constipation at 82.

    7. 84

      Mercifully his time is almost over

    8. 112

      Europe Braces for Escalation: Germany Mobilizes NATO Troops Amid Putin's Nuclear Threats

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...