Jump to content

Judge orders Trump and companies to pay nearly $355 million in civil fraud trial


Social Media

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I don't disagree but, it's all been said before, but it's  that equal justice and protections under the law principle.

As an outsider I see a stirring need for Trump to be taken to account on things he has done. There's many reasons I don't like Trump - over valuing properties to get bigger loans where they were all paid back  is at the lower end. I am playing devil's advocate to ask something - would have this and some other charges been pursued if it wasn't Trump. Not sure. 

I would personally focus criticism of Trump supporters on things like their acceptance of his support of dictators, trashing of democratic principles e.g. accepting outcome of elections etc etc. Though they should accept he did the wrong thing in this case I wouldn't consider it unreasonable for them to raise the issue of possible bias in the steps leading to todays findings. 

 

OK, but as to …” would have this and some other charges been pursued if it wasn't Trump. Not sure.” Might ask Bernie Madoff.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billd766 said:

Would that be the same world that Trump gets to pick his own judge?

Guess it would be improper here to mention Trump’s appointments to the Supreme Court abetted by Mitch McConnell refusing to allow a vote on President Obama’s appointment ….

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Walker88 said:

Perhaps you are unaware that judges have the right to vote. Party affiliation doesn't equate to bias, except in the minds of losers.

 

How about the corrupt Clarence Thomas and his QAnon wife? Should Thomas be allowed to rule on anything trumpish? How about Gorsuch, the crazy Catholic woman and the Yale fratboy, all three of whom trump appointed?

You know better than to allow someone to lead you away from the core issue. Same with me … hard to bite my tongue and not react but there is no end (and no reason) in their madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

I love it when guys like you start frothing at the mouth about liberal lefty pinko commies. Please continue.......


all the frothing I’ve seen so far are the previous comments, yours included.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 4
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I didn't hear any Trumper complaining when Trump stacked the Supreme Court with conservatives.

What about them? AFAIK none were called a rapist by a judge, were prosecuted for massive fraud, or willfully exposed national secrets. None paid off a porn star, or tried to overturn an election.

Look over there is a pathetic defense, come up with something remotely resembling fact. You are only embarrassing yourself.

555 Yes it is all stacked against him! Rightly so, these were his actions, no one else, as you point out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, candide said:

The kind of reaction expected from  a 100% MAGA poster  who's grasping at straws because his political idol is a crook.


And your reaction is exactly what I expect from a Never Trumper…yawn.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

and if that is paid off what exactly is the issue? if i said i wanted a loan on my property and said its worth 3mil, the bank would come and value it themselves

 

GAWD how this lack of awareness is getting old.

 

The banks dared not argue with that fraudster cuz he would leave a trail of dead companies which disagreed with him in his wake. Even the largest of financial institutions turned a blind eye for fear of the legal entanglements.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

and if that is paid off what exactly is the issue? 

Lying on legal documents is bad.

 

Bad things get punished, not always, but sometimes.

 

Even if you do a bad thing and nothing bad happens, bad things are still bad.

 

Like if I go into the bank and give the bank teller a stick-up note and then I DON'T actually rob the bank, I still did a bad thing.

 

Like I said, bad things are bad.

 

Your -and his- basic defense is: well, not that bad. How's that been working out for Ol' Stinky?

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...