candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 hour ago, candide said: So where is it written in this interview transcript that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down."? 😀 Crickets..... 😀 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post G_Money Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 11 minutes ago, candide said: Crickets..... 😀 Not going to re invent the wheel again every time some left wing loon demands proof that’s available and has been seen by millions already. One minute google search will prove everything., which you already knew. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 9 minutes ago, G_Money said: Not going to re invent the wheel again every time some left wing loon demands proof that’s available and has been seen by millions already. One minute google search will prove everything., which you already knew. Sure! You don't need to provide any proof of your B.S. conspiracy theory...because there is none! 😀 So you confirm that the claim that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down" is nowhere to be found in your source. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) 40 minutes ago, impulse said: Getting arrested in a Blue city is meaningless. How many went to prison? Not to jail for a few hours waiting on a bail hearing... To prison? People were arrested. As of Jan 6, 2021 that information was available. I seriously doubt that the rioters knew about the number or arrests or the conviction rate, so blaming BLM for their decision to commit crimes is ludricous. Or were you just trying to divert with a false analogy? Rather than just assuming BLM protesters got away with something, why don't you do a little of your own research and prove or disprove your assumption? For now all we can be sure of is that thousands of people were arrested as part of the BLM protests. It's possible they had a lower conviction rate because they didn't post evidence of there crimes on social media. But they certainly didn't "get away with it". Edited March 7 by heybruce 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, candide said: Sure! You don't need to provide any proof of your B.S. conspiracy theory...because there is none! 😀 So you confirm that the claim that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down" is nowhere to be found in your source. I believe you’re confused , not surprised. What source are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) 6 hours ago, johnnybangkok said: 'Pelosi’s spokesman said she was not consulted about the National Guard before Jan. 6. And the former House sergeant-at-arms, who reported to Pelosi, testified that he had no discussions about National Guard troops with any congressional leaders before Jan. 6. Without evidence to back it, we rate Trump’s statement False. PolitiFact | No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it Fact check: Trump did not request 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 (usatoday.com) AP fact check rates GOP claim Pelosi blocked National Guard on Jan. 6 ‘false’ | The Hill FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org Next! 5 hours ago, frank83628 said: the narrative pelosi wants is exactly what you posted in those links.. https://twitter.com/SpeakerMcCarthy/status/1419992938784952327?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1419992938784952327|twgr^1450b6c2c01d23edda11052d2be7df815ede3f25|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ffact-check%2Fpelosi-national-guard-capitol%2F 25 minutes ago, G_Money said: I believe you’re confused , not surprised. What source are you referring to? Multiple sources were provided disproving your claim about Pelosi, and in defense of the claim you post a link to a tweet by a partisan politician. The bizarre thing is that the tweet doesn't prove anything. For those who didn't read the tweet (I didn't initially), here it is in its entirety: "What you won’t hear from Pelosi’s sham committee: Why was the Capitol left so vulnerable that day? Why wasn't the National Guard here? Why didn’t we have a better security posture? What changes are needed to make sure it never happens again?" If you don't see the disparity in evidence, you are the one who is confused. Edited March 7 by heybruce 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, heybruce said: Multiple sources were provided disproving your claim about Pelosi, and in defense of the claim you post a link to a tweet by a partisan politician. The bizarre thing is that the tweet doesn't prove anything. If you don't see the disparity in evidence, you are the one who is confused. Which link was mine? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Fan mail is all caught up with so Ladies, put your hand bags away for a while. Going for a Buddha Hill walk on this warm Pattaya sunset. Back later to answer fan mail. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 2 hours ago, G_Money said: Scroll down a few posts. 19 minutes ago, G_Money said: I believe you’re confused , not surprised. What source are you referring to? The source you referred to in your post. Actually it wasn't your source, it was from Impulse, you just invited yourself to the discussion. I got confused because you replied to my post (crickets) which was addressed to other posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 5 minutes ago, G_Money said: Which link was mine? You are correct. No link supporting the Pelosi claim has been provided by you or anyone else. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post riclag Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 (edited) 4 hours ago, frank83628 said: no, the point being, she used the same or very similar terminology. if Trumps said go n smash the place up then fine, but he didn't, it was no different to hers, just a different setting. as you are quick to do forget it...he actually said 'March peacefully' The far left never never afforded Trump the title POTUS !From The soft coup attempt of Crossfire Hurricane to the inspired protests 45 aint my President or The activist at the Washington Post from day one “The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/20/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/ The radical left and their supporters of socialism & Marxism crossed the rubicon years ago! imop Edited March 7 by riclag 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 12 minutes ago, riclag said: The far left never never afforded Trump the title POTUS !From The soft coup attempt of Crossfire Hurricane to the inspired protests 45 aint my President or The activist at the Washington Post from day one “The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/20/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/ The radical left and their supporters of socialism & Marxism crossed the rubicon years ago! imop The only person who claimed there had been massive fraud during the 2016 election was....Trump! 😀 He was pissed off that Hillary won the popular vote, so he claimed there had been massive fraud. He even created an investigation commission which, as the other misc. GOP committees, went nowhere! 😀 Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud https://apnews.com/article/f5f6a73b2af546ee97816bb35e82c18d 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolf Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 On 3/6/2024 at 12:07 PM, Lacessit said: Perhaps if you posted a poll showing Trump's standing with Democrat voters and women, it might be more relevant. Or a graph showing Biden's campaign funding compared to Trump's meager collections from his goobers. You're the one out of touch. Who cares about Democrat voters? They support an 81yo who can't remember anything. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolf Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 31 minutes ago, riclag said: The far left never never afforded Trump the title POTUS !From The soft coup attempt of Crossfire Hurricane to the inspired protests 45 aint my President or The activist at the Washington Post from day one “The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/20/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/ The radical left and their supporters of socialism & Marxism crossed the rubicon years ago! imop Yes. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 3 hours ago, candide said: Crickets..... 😀 Do you like to eat them nice and crispy ? carbon neutral think of the planet and "Greta" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 6 hours ago, impulse said: If you've got an extra hour, here's a Tucker Carlson interview with Steven Sund, the Capitol Police Chief at the time of the Jan 6 protest. The security failures on Jan 6 weren't failures as much as the plan. https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-steven-sund/ That was a waste of time. Steven Sud thought he didn't get the resources or intelligence he needed. I've never known a commander who thought otherwise, including me (way back when). Nothing about a deep state conspiracy. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Roo Island Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 3 hours ago, G_Money said: Not going to re invent the wheel again every time some left wing loon demands proof that’s available and has been seen by millions already. One minute google search will prove everything., which you already knew. One minute Google search will prove Trump's a liar. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roo Island Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 7 hours ago, impulse said: If you've got an extra hour, here's a Tucker Carlson interview with Steven Sund, the Capitol Police Chief at the time of the Jan 6 protest. The security failures on Jan 6 weren't failures as much as the plan. https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-steven-sund/ Why would anyone listen to Tucker? Pure misinformation. As his lawyers admit. Boggles my mind. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roo Island Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 hour ago, Dolf said: Who cares about Democrat voters? They support an 81yo who can't remember anything. Kinda like the the 77yo who can't remember anything? https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-forgot-name-kid-south-carolina-victory-speech-2024-2 Trump forgot to name one of his kids during victory speech in South Carolina — despite them standing onstage with him 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 6 minutes ago, Roo Island said: One minute Google search will prove Trump's a liar. Watch Biden’s speech tonight and witness the greatest liar of any American president. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 3 hours ago, candide said: The source you referred to in your post. Actually it wasn't your source, it was from Impulse, you just invited yourself to the discussion. I got confused because you replied to my post (crickets) which was addressed to other posters. Now we’re both confused. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, G_Money said: Now we’re both confused. Carry on. You replied to my post as if it was addressed to you. It wasn't. Hence the confusion. Now, if you are interested in this discussion I had with other posters, come back when you have a proof that: "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down." 😀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 20 minutes ago, Roo Island said: Why would anyone listen to Tucker? Pure misinformation. As his lawyers admit. Boggles my mind. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers On top of it, the source cited by Impulse doesn't support his claim! 😀 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 12 minutes ago, candide said: You replied to my post as if it was addressed to you. It wasn't. Hence the confusion. Now, if you are interested in this discussion I had with other posters, come back when you have a proof that: "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down." 😀 I don’t know who your boy was last year nor do I know who he is this year. It ain’t me. Boy fetch this, boy fetch that. I already posted my rebuttal concerning the re invention of the wheel Go fetch it, boy! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 3 minutes ago, G_Money said: I don’t know who your boy was last year nor do I know who he is this year. It ain’t me. Boy fetch this, boy fetch that. I already posted my rebuttal concerning the re invention of the wheel Go fetch it, boy! In summary, you have nothing. That's what I thought. 😃 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, candide said: In summary, you have nothing. That's what I thought. 😃 You have already seen it but refuse to accept it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, G_Money said: You have already seen it but refuse to accept it. What have I seen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, candide said: What have I seen? 2 minutes ago, candide said: What have I seen? My finger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted March 7 Popular Post Share Posted March 7 2 minutes ago, G_Money said: My finger? Sorry, but your finger is not an evidence that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down." 😀 BTW, nobody forced you to reply to a post which was not for you. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_Money Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 8 minutes ago, candide said: Sorry, but your finger is not an evidence that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down." 😀 BTW, nobody forced you to reply to a post which was not for you. Now you tell me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now