Clinton says Trump’s threats ‘should scare every American’

[charleskerins]

10 hours ago, morrobay said:

You know what should scare Americans even more hellery ? When they are overseas for example tasks with embassy security. And when that diplomatic compound was under seige and diplomats in Benghazi were in serious danger. A president and secretary of state just sat on their hands during the seige , and did not order reinforcements to rescue and counter attack. That is, assets in Italy and North Africa.

Really ?  You seem pretty concerned about security and Americans under siege. First of all the  BS  you posted was debunked years ago. You need  to catch up on the latest conspiracy.However, if you are so concerned about security   Riddle me this should Americans be concerned about an attack on Congress and the US Capitol ?  The current president at the time did NOTHING   (well he watched it on tv.)   So go ahead answer the question.   Security 

[charleskerins]

9 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Then you have missed my point.  The fact checks do refute the Clinton Body Count.

 

But Shakespeare comes to mind:  The lady doth protest too much, methinks

Or the redneck version:  Where there's smoke, there's fire.

 

Or the more contemporary:  Are you going to trust the fact checkers, or your lying eyes? (I paraphrased)

 

Yeah 1/6/21   fact check that.

[charleskerins]

9 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I'm saying that today's fact checkers are even less reliable than the sources they claim to be checking.  And that, when you have dozens of fact checkers all refuting a bunch of claims, the salient point is that there are so many claims out there to refute.

 

 

"There's too many claims out there"   pathetic    that's exactly the point lie lie and lie   they will get exhausted refuting you   NAZI 101

[charleskerins]

4 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

What? Like Clinton's "support"? 

 

The scariest thing about this story is the picture of the old crone herself.

 

What scares you her intelligence ,her independence the idea that she dwarfs your insecure manliness with ther confidence?  "old crone"   says the old crone

[charleskerins]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 

Loser HRC is hardly unbiased, is she?

As for saying Biden is committed to civility and avoidance of vitriolic attacks, that deserves two .

What did she lose  the respect of trash ?  She never had it never wanted it . She certainly didn't lose any election where the peoples votes counted.  Poor fellow can't handle intelligent women. What deserves two s##ts is your opinion.

[johng]

Just now, charleskerins said:

about an attack on Congress and the US Capitol ?

There was no "attack" on the Capital there was a "mostly peaceful" with no fires or looting protest that got a bit out of hand after police used tear gass and at the same time the police escorted some of the protesters around the building.

The only person killed on that day was a protester shot by police.

Trump said protest peacefully but his tweet and account where removed.

[charleskerins]

4 hours ago, proton said:

Bitter scaremongering old hag, never got over her defeat to Trump.

Bitter balding overweigh  misogynist   playing on your keyboard         she is just telling the truth -you can't handle it.

[charleskerins]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I missed that photo first time I came on here and had to go back to see it. A very, very scary thing indeed- verily the stuff of nightmares. We were sooooooo lucky that Trump was able to defeat her in 2016.

Who is we?     

[charleskerins]

9 minutes ago, johng said:

There was no "attack" on the Capital there was a "mostly peaceful" with no fires or looting protest that got a bit out of hand after police used tear gass and at the same time the police escorted some of the protesters around the building.

The only person killed on that day was a protester shot by police.

Trump said protest peacefully but his tweet and account where removed.

Your post is a joke  there is no sense discussing anything with you   you are blind to the facts.   peaceful

[billd766]

4 hours ago, proton said:

Bitter scaremongering old hag, never got over her defeat to Trump.

Has Trump got over his defeat by President Biden yet?

 

Yet YOU seem to believe that Hilary Clinton is bitter.

[Thingamabob]

1 minute ago, charleskerins said:

Your post is a joke  there is no sense discussing anything with you   you are blind to the facts.   peaceful

Wrong. YOU are blind to the facts.

[charleskerins]

1 minute ago, Thingamabob said:

Wrong. YOU are blind to the facts.

What a rebuttal strong on substance are you going to take your ball and go home now?

 

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

[Jing Joe]

4 hours ago, retarius said:

It's 'grammar,' not 'grammer'. Learn to spell before criticising others. 

 

Mmmm maybe leave them be?  "The Americans havent spoken English for years", and so much spelling they have changed, there is no spell check. Even if so, it would trend towards the bastardised versions coming out of the the U.S. Its a dead giveaway of poster's nationalities and its surprising how many are U.S. & anti Trump. Just saying, and this Aussie dislikes him intensely.

[charleskerins]

10 minutes ago, riclag said:

Forum rules dont matter to your kind!

You shouldn’t be allowed a seat at the table. Calling someone a A$$ is a flagrant violation & trolling!

You belong in my ignore sanctuary room for radical lefties!

 

Calling a woman voted the most admired woman in the world for 17 years an old hag is fine with your kind but when someone calls them out you want to run cancel culture on them .  You're pretty clueless about radical lefties 

[BangkokReady]

Neither Clintons have any credibility, and their criticism of Trump is likely to get him more followers.

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, charleskerins said:

Really ?  You seem pretty concerned about security and Americans under siege. First of all the  BS  you posted was debunked years ago. You need  to catch up on the latest conspiracy.However, if you are so concerned about security   Riddle me this should Americans be concerned about an attack on Congress and the US Capitol ?  The current president at the time did NOTHING   (well he watched it on tv.)   So go ahead answer the question.   Security 

These four gentlemen will disagree with you on Benghazi, if they could.

 

I will do them justice in your ignorance.

 

 

[G_Money]

21 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

Calling a woman voted the most admired woman in the world for 17 years an old hag is fine with your kind but when someone calls them out you want to run cancel culture on them .  You're pretty clueless about radical lefties 

What have you been smoking?

 

It should be outlawed 

[G_Money]

44 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

"old hag"      typical from knuckle draggers 

You must admit.  She looks more like Bill every day.

[G_Money]

The only thing that scared me more than a possible Hillary win in 2016 is Harris assuming POTUS when Biden keels over.

 

Why is she even giving comments anymore.  She’s a has been that never had it in the first place.

Edited April 24 by G_Money

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

The only thing that scared me more than a possible Hillary win in 2016 is Harris assuming POTUS when Biden keels over.

Being afraid of your own imagination must be a terrible burden.

 

Where ever you go, your frightening imagination is there too.

 

You have my sympathy, it can’t be easy.

 

 

[G_Money]

5 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Absolutely not true unless you've drank the kool-aid. This is what they want you to believe

This is what I want to know.

 

If you took these four words out of your vocabulary would you be able to post a reply?

 

Troll, Kool-Aid, Faux News and Echo-Chamber.

 

Well?

 

No need for a lengthy reply.  A simple yes or no will suffice.

Edited April 24 by G_Money

[G_Money]

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Being afraid of your own imagination must be a terrible burden.

 

Where ever you go, your frightening imagination is there too.

 

You have my sympathy, it can’t be easy.

 

 

Every time I get a response from you I see it as a win win.  I’m doing my job.

 

Even better when you speak woke; gaslighting, ad hominem etc etc

 

Do you speak Jive?  

[stoner]

2 hours ago, charleskerins said:

6 hours ago, proton said:

Bitter scaremongering old hag, never got over her defeat to Trump.

Bitter balding overweigh  misogynist   playing on your keyboard         she is just telling the truth -you can't handle it.

 

i didn't know this many personal insults were allowed in a single comment on these threads. 

 

keep up the good fight insulting everyone you can. it's a great look. 

[stoner]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He's probably got too much sense to get involved again, or perhaps he's too busy smokin' big cigars with Monica to bother.

 

or he knows he should keep his trap shut as his previous track record is quite abysmal. 

 

bill clinton is a vile man through and through. i remember back when hillary stood firm with this predator during his sexual misconduct days.  

 

then years later she goes on to say all women should be believed. 

 

cindy lauper comes to mind. 

[Walker88]

The current FBI Director Wray, in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt, said that he would not open investigations on trump's critics and opponents, as trump claims he plans to do. Absent any evidence of an actual crime, Wray said the men and women of the FBI would not be ordered to do anything just because it was trump's desire.

 

Recall that trump appointed Wray after firing James Comey, so that's one more former trump official who has turned against trump and his dictates.

 

Remember during the transition, when trump tried to appoint Jeffrey Clarke (an EPA lawyer) as Acting AG, because Clarke would do trump's bidding and halt the election certification. The entire senior service at DoJ threatened to resign if Clarke took office. The same would happen at many agencies if trump appointed clowns as Chiefs.

 

trump would have to fire Wray and appoint some incompetent lackey, which would likely result in a mass exodus from the bureau, leaving domestic criminals and any sleeper cells of terrorists free to do whatever they want whenever they want. The US would experience terror attacks, hijackings, and John Gotti would probably rise from the grave.

 

The bureau and the agency are the two main entities who gather intel on any domestic (FBI) or foreign (agency) threat to the President or any elected official. A mass exodus of skilled and experienced employees would leave trump himself vulnerable.  trump would be putting his life in the hands of clowns like Bannon or Jared or Kash Patel, which is like having a 3rd grade school monitor trying to protect the Principal from an asteroid. Consider how much of an incompetent clown Devin Nunes has been running Truth Social, and now imagine the consequences of incompetence are life and death.

 

LOL.

 

[stoner]

8 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

LOL.

 

you're laughing at your own post. oooops. 

[G_Money]

4 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

The current FBI Director Wray, in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt, said that he would not open investigations on trump's critics and opponents, as trump claims he plans to do. Absent any evidence of an actual crime, Wray said the men and women of the FBI would not be ordered to do anything just because it was trump's desire.

 

Recall that trump appointed Wray after firing James Comey, so that's one more former trump official who has turned against trump and his dictates.

 

Remember during the transition, when trump tried to appoint Jeffrey Clarke (an EPA lawyer) as Acting AG, because Clarke would do trump's bidding and halt the election certification. The entire senior service at DoJ threatened to resign if Clarke took office. The same would happen at many agencies if trump appointed clowns as Chiefs.

 

trump would have to fire Wray and appoint some incompetent lackey, which would likely result in a mass exodus from the bureau, leaving domestic criminals and any sleeper cells of terrorists free to do whatever they want whenever they want. The US would experience terror attacks, hijackings, and John Gotti would probably rise from the grave.

 

The bureau and the agency are the two main entities who gather intel on any domestic (FBI) or foreign (agency) threat to the President or any elected official. A mass exodus of skilled and experienced employees would leave trump himself vulnerable.  trump would be putting his life in the hands of clowns like Bannon or Jared or Kash Patel, which is like having a 3rd grade school monitor trying to protect the Principal from an asteroid. Consider how much of an incompetent clown Devin Nunes has been running Truth Social, and now imagine the consequences of incompetence are life and death.

 

LOL.

 

And now you’re scaring me.

 

Thank God you have no influence on how America is run. 
 

But by all means, continue your dreams.  It’s what keeps you going.

 

Actually I’m quite surprised you’re no longer with the CIA seeing how you are tree of knowledge on the forums intel matters.

 

Will you ever come clean and tell us of your termination?

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, G_Money said:

This is what I want to know.

 

If you took these four words out of your vocabulary would you be able to post a reply?

 

Troll, Kool-Aid, Faux News and Echo-Chamber.

 

Well?

 

No need for a lengthy reply.  A simple yes or no will suffice.

Actually five.  I forgot cult.  
 

My bad.

[morrobay]

11 hours ago, G_Money said:

What have you been smoking?

 

It should be outlawed 

No she/he has not been smoking anything. Just let her/him ramble on with this endless off the wall nonsense. Because that will discredit "these liberals" better than anything you or I could say.

[Walker88]

8 hours ago, G_Money said:

And now you’re scaring me.

 

Thank God you have no influence on how America is run. 
 

But by all means, continue your dreams.  It’s what keeps you going.

 

Actually I’m quite surprised you’re no longer with the CIA seeing how you are tree of knowledge on the forums intel matters.

 

Will you ever come clean and tell us of your termination?

You have an odd obsession.

 

You also seem to have a view of the agency that could not be farther from reality. And no, I'm not Edward Lee Howard (putin had him pushed down a flight of stairs in his Moscow home when Howard's utility ended), Aldrich Ames nor Jim Nicholson.

 

There is plenty of open source information out there, which people with the right amount of intellect and personal experience can parse and build a proper picture of things. I understand that it would present a challenge to typical trumpers, who only wait until talking points are provided by Media for Low-lifes, such as what Roger Ailes specifically created to capture those befuddled by media aimed at people above the mean in terms of intellect.  (it's in his leaked Business Plan for Fox)

 

All of the little old man cult members never answer any of the key questions that are at the core of why trump is under 91 felony indictments. All trumpers have are the words Fox or Newsmax gives them, such as "weaponization" or some fictitious ailment. Though I'm voiding into the wind and the fever swamps of trumpistan and the cult, I'll ask again:

 

---why would trump steal TS, SCI, SAP, SITK, Codeword, HCS and RD documents, keep them at his wedding planner facility where anyone choosing to pony up $200K can join (such as a case officer in the MSS), and then lie to the FBI about returning them? He cannot "declassify with his mind", and though you don't know the system, ACTUAL declassification requires a paper trail of sign-offs by agency Chiefs plus a final signature by the White House Counsel, none of which exist with what trump stole. Also, even as sitting POTUS, he would not have HCS (Human Clandestine Sources), as he would have no 'need to know'. Clearly trump would have had to specifically ask for them from one of the two lackeys he appointed as DNI (Grenell and Ratcliffe). As for RD, only the DoE can declassify RD docs, not even a POTUS.

 

---why did trump try to pressure GA SecState Raffensperger to "just find me...11,780 votes" if not to obviate the actual votes of GA citizens?

 

---Why did trump call his goobers to DC for the pro forma 6 January 2021 certification of the election 50 States had already completed, saying "It'll be WILD!", and why would he hold his Mall rally and tell them to "march to the Capitol" and "fight like hell". Is trump an idiot who could "never have imagined such violence', or was it malice aforethought?

 

---Why did trump do absolutely nothing for 187 minutes while his goobers were smashing the Capitol doors and windows, injuring 140 police officers, and chanting "Hang Mike Pence!", all of which was being broadcast around the world by numerous media? At a Hearing last week in Congress, the Chief of the DC National Guard said he informed the White House that his men were ready to deploy, but trump refused---and the President is the sole person with authority to deploy them. Why?

 

---Bonus: do you consider the terrorists who attacked the Capitol, erected gallows, and were intent on hanging the Vice President "hostages and political prisoners'? How about the Oath Keepers (sic) who had stashed an arsenal in a Motel 6 in Arlington, to be used when trump called them up? Hostages, too?

 

---Why did trump---according to grand jury testimony by trump's own former staffers---sign off on the illegal Fake Elector Scheme? (It will be adjudicated in Federal Court once trump's delay tactics run their course.)

 

I know Fox has not provided the cult with talking points that would answer these questions, so perhaps while you're puttering around Pattaya on that red Vespa, you can give it some thought and try to answer. It would be amusing.

 

Incidentally, it saddens me that people who took an oath to the Constitution forget what they swore to and have become cult members who put a person over country, democracy and rule of law, the founding principles of the nation. Apparently they never understood their oath, and in no way do they deserve the pension they live off. trumper or against trump, it is not a matter of opinion; it is solely about right and wrong and what the US is supposed to be vs what trump hopes to make it.

 

I become more certain of the evil inherent in trump's cult when nobody ever can answer the questions I posed above. trumpers are cultists and nothing less, and wouldn't know patriotism if Nathan Hale smacked them in the head.