Whats the legal age of consent in Thailand. Its confusing.

[metisdead]

An off topic post about the Taliban contravening our Community Standards has been removed.

 

Some bickering posts and replies contravening our Community Standards has been removed.

[susanlea]

42 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It's not an overaction at all.  I simply pointed out what you are doing.  🤷‍♂️

Which is normal. Your responses are not.

[BangkokReady]

6 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Which is normal. Your responses are not.

 

Making "Say you agree with us or face the consequences" type threats is not normal in the slightest.  Pointing it out and disagreeing with it is very normal.

[susanlea]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Making "Say you agree with us or face the consequences" type threats is not normal in the slightest.  Pointing it out and disagreeing with it is very normal.

So you believe it is ok to date minors.

[BangkokReady]

5 minutes ago, susanlea said:

So you believe it is ok to date minors.

 

LOL.  And you want to try and say that I'm the one who is not making normal responses?  🤦‍♂️

[susanlea]

19 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

LOL.  And you want to try and say that I'm the one who is not making normal responses?  🤦‍♂️

Your responses are weird.

[AreYouGerman]

My school in Germany had classes from 6 to 13, basically 13-14 yo's and 17-19 yo's in the same building and it was so common to see 19 yo boys with 14 yo girls and my 2nd girlfriend at the time I was 18 was 14-15 as well. Even it is a sin as it is fornication which I didn't understand previously, biological it is totally normal and nothing weird about it - people who think post puberty girls aren't interested in sexual relationships are weird and people who think adult males are not interested in signs of fertility of post puberty girls are even more weird.

 

Don't misunderstand biology just because you are entrapped by current anti-male ideology.

 

The most moral thing would be to take the Bible as guidance. No fornication, no adultery, no pornography. The father as the head of the household below Jesus. Post puberty girls off to marriages when the father decides she's ready and homosexuals* and real pedophiles straight to the gallows.

 

Instead, we see young girls having multiple partners before they even turn 18. and then turn to platforms like OnlyFans to become prostitutes and continue sleeping around in their 20s. By 30, they become single mothers or continue with their 'careers' and as they reach their mid 30s these women are frustrated because they can't attract men anymore and attack them for being attracted to younger versions of them.

 

* I am quoting the Bible - not trying to break forum rules.

 

Edited May 16 by AreYouGerman

[JensenZ]

3 hours ago, AreYouGerman said:

 

Yes. Laws. Let's start with laws against pornography, fornication, adultery and especially that 18 yo girls going online and become prostitutes. Oh, right, that's not an issue for you. Great moral compass you have.

 

Also, it seems you don't know about international laws. So, it seems 14 would be okay in many country, including Germany. As you are about laws and not about moral, lets follow the laws then.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

 

Instead of trying to frame me as being upset, try to explain yourself why you are against a society led by morals. Why would it be wrong marrying a virgin (at the age according to laws) instead of a single mother in her 30s?

 

 

Yes, laws. It's better to have laws than none at all. I'm sure you have a decent life in Germany/Thailand/Philippines or wherever you live under the laws of those countries. There's no point dreaming about a utopian society that can't exist in the real world. Despite all their complaining, people are living quite well in many countries these days. Transport back a few hundred years to appreciate the difference.

 

BTW, if you find a deep province somewhere in the Philippines, you can live in a society that practices a version of "led by morals". The NPA take care of business without any help from the law. If you're mistreating your wife or kid, they will punish you according to the severity of the abuse.

 

 

[shdmn]

As soon as I saw the title of this thread.

 

Edited May 16 by shdmn

[AreYouGerman]

21 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

There's no point dreaming about a utopian society that can't exist in the real world.

 

Good point but the society I am describing existed for thousands of years. The modern society on the other hand just for a couple of decades and it doesn't look like people, especially females, are enjoying it as it is totally against nature. And the more China's influence grows, the less we go against nature - so don't think the current state in White countries will persist.

 

https://slate.com/human-interest/2009/05/women-are-more-unhappy-than-ever.html

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/13/happiness-of-girls-and-young-women-at-lowest-level-since-2009-shows-uk-poll

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/25/global-divide-on-homosexuality-persists/

 

Edited May 16 by AreYouGerman

[thaibeachlovers]

On 5/7/2024 at 7:43 AM, Simon1287 said:

 

Despite what anyone might decide is or isn't the legal age for sex the plain fact is that having sex with an under 18 year old in modern day Thailand, paid or unpaid, opens you up to the possibility of huge expense, imprisonment or both. 

 

If the girl happened to be the daughter of a Thai with “standing” and money who did not approve it might even be sensible to shy away if she was 19, though 18 is fine 99.999% of the time. (Of course, I am only referring to possible “legal” repercussions).

 

It's a fact. Bear it in mind.

 

 

Sensible post, compared to the ones trying to say that no trouble will ensue for bonking a 15 year old.

 

My rule was if she looked too young stay away.

 

Have to be mad to get involved with a 15 year old. Far too immature to have a proper relationship with, and it's not fair of the randy old man to deprive a child of her childhood just because he can't control himself.

[thaibeachlovers]

17 hours ago, AreYouGerman said:

Is it better to marry off a 16 yo girl into a marriage which lasts forever (very common until, let's say 1960) or cheering her on that once she's 18 she will post her first gangbang video on OnlyFans because that's what a liberated woman is doing?

 

Age of consent is ridiculous. A 18 yo girl is consenting to getting gangbanged on livestream and cheered on while a post puberty girl cannot consent to getting married to an older man. That's a sick society.

 

Oh, and all the cases of 18+ yo girls getting into a man's home and 20 years later she decided she didn't consent anyway and the current society agrees to that. I would advocate women should not be able to vote if they are not able to consent to intercourse regardless the age anyway.

 

Age of consent is ridicolous, it needs to be replaced with a high morale society, where the father is able to decide if a girl is getting married and when the marriage is consummated.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for having sexual interest in post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society. Not to forget, news headlines about 'Pedophile imprisoned' and then reading about a 30 yo old man and a 16 yo old girl is only diluting the cases where it's a homosexual raping a 5 yo old boy because the word 'pedophile' lost it's meaning.

 

Is it better to marry off a 16 yo girl into a marriage which lasts forever (very common until, let's say 1960)

 

Girls are not a father's chattel to be sold off to some man that she doesn't want to be with. That went out with the Victorians.

 

cheering her on that once she's 18 she will post her first gangbang video on OnlyFans because that's what a liberated woman is doing?

 

Who are you to say what a woman of legal age gets up to sexually? It's none of anyone else's business, or do you think women can't think for themselves?

If women have a "right" an abortion, they certainly have the right to have sex with as many men as they want.

 

Age of consent is ridiculous. A 18 yo girl is consenting to getting gangbanged on livestream and cheered on while a post puberty girl cannot consent to getting married to an older man. That's a sick society.

 

What is sick IMO is forcing a young girl to get married to someone she doesn't want, and depriving her of a childhood.

That's what they did in the middle ages, when girls were a burden for a family and people died at 40.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for having sexual interest in post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for looking at post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society.

 

Fixed it for you

 

Edited May 17 by thaibeachlovers

[AreYouGerman]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Who are you to say what a woman of legal age gets up to sexually?

 

I am a Christian and tend to be a Biblical literalist. That's the authority, not me.

 

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Girls are not a father's chattel to be sold off

 

You don't have to go to extremes. They can go on dates (no fornication) with, f. ex. 16 year of age and the father agrees to it, and find their love. I am not a believer in arranged marriages. Also, I wonder why you are getting so triggered. We don't live in a moral society, so you should be happy. But, if that would be the two options, either 18 yo whores or arranged marriages, I would choose arranged marriages.

 

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If women have a "right" an abortion

 

They should not have the right to murder babies, regardless what time it is. No exceptions.

 

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 or do you think women can't think for themselves?

 

Regarding age of consent it's already established that women can not give consent, regardless how old they are. They consented to get into a man's house or have sex for a movie role and 20 years later they decide they did not consent. Also, if a woman has anything else than a cuck as husband, her opinion is most likely influenced by her man.

 

And let's look at biology again. Women are physical weaker and their hormones don't make them aggressive. They tend to agree easily to prevent being harmed physically and they tend to agree what their social peer groups think. So, yes, based on biological - I know biology is misogynistic - women can't think for themselves.

 

 

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Fixed it for you

 

Nothing to be fixed as it's a fact.

 

 

That's how quoting is done correctly by the way! ☺️

Edited May 17 by AreYouGerman

[Nick Carter icp]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 

 

Saying men are pedophiles for having sexual interest in post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for looking at post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society.

 

Fixed it for you

 

 

 

    Its just some people using the word incorrectly

[sidjameson]

1 hour ago, AreYouGerman said:

 

I am a Christian and tend to be a Biblical literalist. That's the authority, not me.

 

 

You don't have to go to extremes. They can go on dates (no fornication) with, f. ex. 16 year of age and the father agrees to it, and find their love. I am not a believer in arranged marriages. Also, I wonder why you are getting so triggered. We don't live in a moral society, so you should be happy. But, if that would be the two options, either 18 yo whores or arranged marriages, I would choose arranged marriages.

 

 

They should not have the right to murder babies, regardless what time it is. No exceptions.

 

 

Regarding age of consent it's already established that women can not give consent, regardless how old they are. They consented to get into a man's house or have sex for a movie role and 20 years later they decide they did not consent. Also, if a woman has anything else than a cuck as husband, her opinion is most likely influenced by her man.

 

And let's look at biology again. Women are physical weaker and their hormones don't make them aggressive. They tend to agree easily to prevent being harmed physically and they tend to agree what their social peer groups think. So, yes, based on biological - I know biology is misogynistic - women can't think for themselves.

 

 

 

Nothing to be fixed as it's a fact.

 

 

That's how quoting is done correctly by the way! ☺️

You're very insightful on posts I've seen.

Not a Christian but would love to know why you are and a more biblical literalist  one too.

[BangkokReady]

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Its just some people using the word incorrectly

 

I suspect it's simply that they dislike the idea of men having sex with girls who are under 18 so much that they want men who do it to be thought of as being the same as men who rape prepubescent children.  Obviously, if adult men have sex with girls under 18, they may face legal consequences, but that doesn't mean they deserve to be lumped in with actual child-rapists.

[susanlea]

6 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I suspect it's simply that they dislike the idea of men having sex with girls who are under 18 so much that they want men who do it to be thought of as being the same as men who rape prepubescent children.  Obviously, if adult men have sex with girls under 18, they may face legal consequences, but that doesn't mean they deserve to be lumped in with actual child-rapists.

So just half pervert.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 5/17/2024 at 9:46 PM, AreYouGerman said:

We don't live in a moral society, so you should be happy. But, if that would be the two options, either 18 yo whores or arranged marriages, I would choose arranged marriages.

I'm very happy that we don't live in a society ruled by a 2 thousand year old book.

If I had to choose I'd go for 18 year old whores over arranged marriages, and I don't believe in marriage either. They only benefit women in the west and men in the rest of the world.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 5/17/2024 at 9:46 PM, AreYouGerman said:

Also, I wonder why you are getting so triggered.

I hate that anyone thinks they can control other people.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 5/17/2024 at 9:46 PM, AreYouGerman said:

Regarding age of consent it's already established that women can not give consent, regardless how old they are. They consented to get into a man's house or have sex for a movie role and 20 years later they decide they did not consent. Also, if a woman has anything else than a cuck as husband, her opinion is most likely influenced by her man.

I've known hundreds of women well through work and none of them fit your opinion.

 

They only change their mind because the law allows them to. The law, IMO is an ass.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 5/18/2024 at 1:10 AM, BangkokReady said:

 

I suspect it's simply that they dislike the idea of men having sex with girls who are under 18 so much that they want men who do it to be thought of as being the same as men who rape prepubescent children.  Obviously, if adult men have sex with girls under 18, they may face legal consequences, but that doesn't mean they deserve to be lumped in with actual child-rapists.

IMO they don't like men having sex outside marriage as that means they don't get to take all their money when the affair ends.

[GinBoy2]

The sad part of this, no 18 yo female is sexually 'interested' in a 40+ yo male, thats just not how nature works. 

She see's him as an ATM and he is getting his ego stroked

[gargamon]

Only pedophiles are concerned about age of consent.

[brewsterbudgen]

4 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Only pedophiles are concerned about age of consent.

 

Paedophiles are interested in pre-pubescent children, so there's no question whatsoever about such sick individuals being concerned about consent!

[BangkokReady]

50 minutes ago, GinBoy2 said:

The sad part of this, no 18 yo female is sexually 'interested' in a 40+ yo male, thats just not how nature works. 

 

You do not understand how nature works if you believe this.

[BangkokReady]

13 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Only pedophiles are concerned about age of consent.

 

This post is literally about someone considering having sex with an 18 year old and wondering about the age of consent, so you're immediately proven wrong.  🙄

[BritManToo]

On 5/17/2024 at 10:58 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Girls are not a father's chattel to be sold off to some man that she doesn't want to be with. That went out with the Victorians.

The Taliban don't agree!

[thaibeachlovers]

20 hours ago, GinBoy2 said:

The sad part of this, no 18 yo female is sexually 'interested' in a 40+ yo male, thats just not how nature works. 

She see's him as an ATM and he is getting his ego stroked

Win win then.

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, BritManToo said:

The Taliban don't agree!

Neither did the Saudis when I worked there.

My comments were for western women.

[BangkokReady]

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

On 5/19/2024 at 7:41 AM, GinBoy2 said:

The sad part of this, no 18 yo female is sexually 'interested' in a 40+ yo male, thats just not how nature works. 

She see's him as an ATM and he is getting his ego stroked

Win win then.

 

People just like to try and find a negative because they don't like the idea of someone else being happy. 

 

He's probably getting more than his ego stroked.