Whats the legal age of consent in Thailand. Its confusing.

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, susanlea said:

Fascist witch hunt is fairly extreme. You just won't answer a basic question of morals which already gives the answer it is a yes from you.

 

"Say you agree with us or face the consequences" is a textbook example of a fascist witch hunt.

[JensenZ]

On 5/6/2024 at 9:56 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

In Thailand the age of consent is set at 15 years old.

The term "age of consent" specifically refers to the minimum age at which a person is considered legally competent to provide consent for engaging in sexual acts. Individuals below this age do not possess the legal capacity to consent to sexual activities.

 

It's not nearly as simple as you describe here. The age difference of the participants comes into it too, and for countries such as the US and Australia, it's illegal for anyone to have sexual relations with anyone under the age of 18 in ANOTHER country.

[Hummin]

In Cambodia they experienced the expats chasing young girls, and Im not sure what happened, but they proposed a new law where it was illegal for expats to have relationship with young girls? 

 

Im not going to google it out of obvious reasons! 

 

Someone can fill in facts?

[BangkokReady]

3 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

It's not nearly as simple as you describe here. The age difference of the participants comes into it too, and for countries such as the US and Australia, it's illegal for anyone to have sexual relations with anyone under the age of 18 in ANOTHER country.

 

Are you sure it's that, not if they travel for that specific purpose?  Do you have a source?

[JensenZ]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Are you sure it's that, not if they travel for that specific purpose?  Do you have a source?

It's quite easy to find the laws on "sex tourism". Do you have plans to have sexual relations with a girl under the age of 18? 

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

It's quite easy to find the laws on "sex tourism". Do you have plans to have sexual relations with a girl under the age of 18? 

 

I'm not sure if what you are claiming is correct, so I suggest you check it and provide a source.  This is typical when making a factual claim.

[JensenZ]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I'm not sure if what you are claiming is correct, so I suggest you check it and provide a source.  This is typical when making a factual claim.

I'm pretty sure it's correct and it's easy to verify, which I am not going to do for you. I suggest you do the checking if you want to "date" a girl under 18. It's not my concern.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, JensenZ said:

I'm pretty sure it's correct and it's easy to verify, which I am not going to do for you.

 

You're "pretty sure" but you cannot confirm?  It sounds like you're not sure at all.  If you were sure, you would be happy to provide the source that supports your claim.

 

It's up to you if you cannot be bothered to substantiate your claim, but it makes it very unreliable.

[JensenZ]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You're "pretty sure" but you cannot confirm?  It sounds like you're not sure at all.  If you were sure, you would be happy to provide the source that supports your claim.

 

It's up to you if you cannot be bothered to substantiate your claim, but it makes it very unreliable.

You just don't let go, do you? I don't come to this forum for legal advice, and neither should you or anyone else.

 

If you need legal advice, check the laws of your home country before you start dating someone under 18. Most laws of most countries can be found online these days.

 

[JensenZ]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

 

I'm merely replying to your reply.

 

It's OK.  You made a claim that you cannot back up, so your claim means little.  It's not a problem.

Talk about obtuse. I can back up claims, but I don't want to as I find your demands irritating. There is no obligation for members here to provide references, or proof.

[BangkokReady]

Just now, JensenZ said:

I can back up claims, but I don't want to as I find your demands irritating. There is no obligation for members here to provide references, or proof.

 

But there is.  It's in the rules, plus it's considered the done thing when making a factual claim.

 

Overwise, people assume you're making things up.  Which it seems that you are...  🤷‍♂️

[AreYouGerman]

Is it better to marry off a 16 yo girl into a marriage which lasts forever (very common until, let's say 1960) or cheering her on that once she's 18 she will post her first gangbang video on OnlyFans because that's what a liberated woman is doing?

 

Age of consent is ridiculous. A 18 yo girl is consenting to getting gangbanged on livestream and cheered on while a post puberty girl cannot consent to getting married to an older man. That's a sick society.

 

Oh, and all the cases of 18+ yo girls getting into a man's home and 20 years later she decided she didn't consent anyway and the current society agrees to that. I would advocate women should not be able to vote if they are not able to consent to intercourse regardless the age anyway.

 

Age of consent is ridicolous, it needs to be replaced with a high morale society, where the father is able to decide if a girl is getting married and when the marriage is consummated.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for having sexual interest in post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society. Not to forget, news headlines about 'Pedophile imprisoned' and then reading about a 30 yo old man and a 16 yo old girl is only diluting the cases where it's a homosexual raping a 5 yo old boy because the word 'pedophile' lost it's meaning.

 

[susanlea]

2 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

"Say you agree with us or face the consequences" is a textbook example of a fascist witch hunt.

What a total over reaction. You must be scared of something.

[susanlea]

2 hours ago, JensenZ said:

It's quite easy to find the laws on "sex tourism". Do you have plans to have sexual relations with a girl under the age of 18? 

He won't answer, calls it a witch hunt 

[JensenZ]

24 minutes ago, susanlea said:

What a total over reaction. You must be scared of something.

Yes, it was an incredible overreaction. He has difficulty finding the laws on Sex Tourism in whatever country he comes from. It wasn't very challenging... and anyway, who is interested in visiting foreign countries to "date" under 18s? Why is it even a debate?

[JensenZ]

2 hours ago, AreYouGerman said:

Is it better to marry off a 16 yo girl into a marriage which lasts forever (very common until, let's say 1960) or cheering her on that once she's 18 she will post her first gangbang video on OnlyFans because that's what a liberated woman is doing?

 

Age of consent is ridiculous. A 18 yo girl is consenting to getting gangbanged on livestream and cheered on while a post puberty girl cannot consent to getting married to an older man. That's a sick society.

 

Oh, and all the cases of 18+ yo girls getting into a man's home and 20 years later she decided she didn't consent anyway and the current society agrees to that. I would advocate women should not be able to vote if they are not able to consent to intercourse regardless the age anyway.

 

Age of consent is ridicolous, it needs to be replaced with a high morale society, where the father is able to decide if a girl is getting married and when the marriage is consummated.

 

Saying men are pedophiles for having sexual interest in post puberty girls is a hoax by a female controlled society. Not to forget, news headlines about 'Pedophile imprisoned' and then reading about a 30 yo old man and a 16 yo old girl is only diluting the cases where it's a homosexual raping a 5 yo old boy because the word 'pedophile' lost it's meaning.

 

Unfortunately, it is necessary to have laws and set boundaries. If not, we'd be back in the Wild West where anything goes. Did the Romans have it right? They start having children as soon as they start menstruating. My wife's sister started at age 11. Are you upset about this subject because you plan to find a young virgin in the Philippines and you want to avoid any moral judgement?

[BangkokReady]

39 minutes ago, susanlea said:

What a total over reaction. You must be scared of something.

 

Lol. You're literally continuing to do the same thing that you're claiming is an overreaction to point out! 🤦‍♂️

[susanlea]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Lol. You're literally continuing to do the same thing that you're claiming is an overreaction to point out! 🤦‍♂️

You call people fascists for talking like a regular person. 

[BangkokReady]

38 minutes ago, susanlea said:

He won't answer

 

I answered every reply, the onus is on him to support his claim.

 

38 minutes ago, susanlea said:

calls it a witch hunt 

 

I called what you are doing a witch hunt, with this other oddball, I simply asked for a factual claim to be supported with evidence.

 

But keep lying, it's all you have. 🙄

[susanlea]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

 

I answered every reply, the onus is on him to support his claim.

 

 

I called what you are doing a witch hunt, with this other oddball, I simply asked for a factual claim to be supported with evidence.

 

But keep lying, it's all you have. 🙄

Very strange behaviour and responses. No normal adult acts like that.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, susanlea said:

You call people fascists for talking like a regular person. 

 

Check the comments. I called someone a fascist for being a factist.

 

"Say that you agree with what I am saying or face the consequences" is not how normal people talk.

[JensenZ]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I simply asked you to support your claim. No hijacking here.

 

 

Wow. Real mature. If you can support your claim, why don't you just do it?

 

 

You said you didn't believe it was in the rules, so I showed you the rules.

 

Like I said, I understand that the onus is on me to back up a factual claim.

 

Stop being butthurt just because you've been proven wrong.

 

 

Or reply to your comments? Sure!

Get a grip! If you don't believe something, prove it wrong - how simple is that? Instead, you want to blab on about it in 50 posts, begging for me to prove I'm right.

 

I'll give you a clue. Look up the laws on Sex Tourism in your home country. You must be planning on under 18 dating, so it is best you familiarize yourself with the laws in your country. You might be ok, you might not be - I don't care.

[susanlea]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Check the comments. I called someone a fascist for being a factist.

 

"Say that you agree with what I am saying or face the consequences" is not how normal people talk.

You are paranoid about something. Tell us what you did.

[GeorgeCross]

On 5/6/2024 at 10:10 PM, OneMoreFarang said:

Can you explain?

As far as I know girls are not allowed to work in gogo-bar when they are under 20 for that reason.

And in some areas, i.e. Nana, this is now enforced. 

 

in hua hin its 50.. and rigidly enforced too 😂

[AreYouGerman]

2 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

Unfortunately, it is necessary to have laws and set boundaries. If not, we'd be back in the Wild West where anything goes. Did the Romans have it right? They start having children as soon as they start menstruating. My wife's sister started at age 11. Are you upset about this subject because you plan to find a young virgin in the Philippines and you want to avoid any moral judgement?

 

Yes. Laws. Let's start with laws against pornography, fornication, adultery and especially that 18 yo girls going online and become prostitutes. Oh, right, that's not an issue for you. Great moral compass you have.

 

Also, it seems you don't know about international laws. So, it seems 14 would be okay in many country, including Germany. As you are about laws and not about moral, lets follow the laws then.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

 

Instead of trying to frame me as being upset, try to explain yourself why you are against a society led by morals. Why would it be wrong marrying a virgin (at the age according to laws) instead of a single mother in her 30s?

 

 

[BangkokReady]

13 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Very strange behaviour and responses. No normal adult acts like that.

 

No normal adult asks someone to back up their claim?  What are you talking about?

[BangkokReady]

12 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

Get a grip! If you don't believe something, prove it wrong - how simple is that? Instead, you want to blab on about it in 50 posts, begging for me to prove I'm right.

 

I'll give you a clue. Look up the laws on Sex Tourism in your home country. You must be planning on under 18 dating, so it is best you familiarize yourself with the laws in your country. You might be ok, you might not be - I don't care.

 

It just doesn't work like that.

 

"Here's my claim and it's up to you to prove me wrong if you disagree." 

 

No.  The onus is on you to support the claim that you made.

[BangkokReady]

59 minutes ago, susanlea said:

What a total over reaction.

 

It's not an overaction at all.  I simply pointed out what you are doing.  🤷‍♂️

[jayboy]

When snooty people say, as they do sometimes, that Asean Now is primarily composed of middle aged lower class sexpats, I shall direct them to this thread to dispel that slanderous suggestion since the quality and class of the participants are clearly on display.

[BangkokReady]

5 minutes ago, jayboy said:

middle aged

 

I don't think anyone says the people on AN are mostly middle aged.  It's retirees mostly.

 

Normally people say "salty old sexpats".