Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

"Russia’s Gazprom continues to send gas even though Ukraine has captured a key technical site in Kursk. The consequences could be extremely serious for the company and the Kremlin." 

 

Ukraine Has its Foot on Gazprom’s Throat

Russia’s Gazprom continues to send gas even though Ukraine has captured a key technical site in Kursk. The consequences could be extremely serious for the company and the Kremlin. 

It is the only remaining route to deliver gas directly to Europe and became even more crucial after the Yamal and Nord Stream 1 pipelines ceased operations in 2022.

At present, the gas flow through Sudzha is 40-42 million cubic meters per day, making it an indispensable link in the chain of Russian gas exports to Europe. It is even more important to Gazprom, the once money-spinning gas giant financially humbled by the continent’s turn away from Kremlin energy.

https://cepa.org/article/ukraine-has-its-foot-on-gazproms-throat/

image.png.091d45144d1c49e1388a3c0f57935e7d.png

 

 

I'm sure the hotline to Germany is running hot 

Posted (edited)

Julian Ropcke Defence Corrrespondent for Der Bild and uber all in Ukrainiain supporter is one of the brave souls that calls it as he sees it. You won't ever see this on the r/Ukraine sub. Either that or he is a deep cover Putin shill - he is German after all. The subtext of his honesty is I think the same as Zelesnkiy cries - things are desperate we need our allies to go all in or at least stop handcuffing the use of high tech weaponery to strike deep within Russia or Ukraine will lose the war.

 

 

Screenshot 2024-08-28 071907.jpg

Edited by beautifulthailand99
Posted
7 hours ago, stevenl said:

I'm sure the hotline to Germany is running hot 

I don't think Germany still gets gas from Gazprom.

Posted (edited)

https://archive.is/U7mCW

 

Zelensky says Kursk offensive is collateral in a victory plan

 

Zelensky’s peace plans have often seemed overly ambitious. Last year’s ten-point proposal demanded that Putin withdraw from all Ukrainian territory and reaffirm Ukraine’s borders. These terms were unrealistic given Kyiv had no major victories on the frontline since the liberation of the Kharkiv region and Kherson in 2022. With so few details available on Zelensky’s new plan, its practicality remains uncertain. But even if Zelensky’s plan is rejected in Washington, allies will have to rethink their vague commitment to support Ukraine ‘as long as it takes’ – or the war will go on forever.

 

Svitlana Morenets is a Ukrainian journalist and a staff writer at The Spectator. She was named Young Journalist of the Year in the 2024 UK Press Awards

Edited by beautifulthailand99
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Expanding its hold on the Kursk region and another oil depot hit. This time in the Rostov region.:thumbsup:

 

Ukraine has taken control of 100 Russian settlements as it continued an offensive into Russia’s Kursk region, a top military commander claimed.

Ukrainian general Oleksandr Syrskyi said his troops now control 1,294 sq km (500 sq miles) of Russian territory and have taken 594 prisoners of war.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-russia-war-kursk-belgorod-missiles-putin-news-b2602854.html

 

Cooking nicely........

 

In what's becoming a difficult week for Russian oil infrastructure, another oil storage complex in Rostov region is burning after Ukrainian drone strikes.

The Atlas oil depot in Rostov Oblast.

 

 

An eye for an eye will leave everyone blind.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, candide said:

I don't think Germany still gets gas from Gazprom.

I thought they did, which is why they didn't agree to a total EU embargo on Russian gas.

 

But I'm not completely sure about it.

Edited by stevenl
Posted
2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

I thought they did, which is why they didn't agree to a total EU embargo on Russian gas.

 

But I'm not completely sure about it.

 

Most of the EU, including Germany still buy Russian gas. It just doesn't get there via pipelines. Belgium and Netherlands buy Liquified Natural Gas. In 2023 Russian LNG gas imports rose by 41%. Belgium and France then convert that into gas and send it over pipelines to Germany. About 26% of German gas comes from Belgian and Dutch pipelines. About 11 percent of those are Russian gas.

 

 

Posted

Off topic and links to 2023 articles removed also replies

Posted

Ukraine’s Deep Strikes Into Russia Hitting Faraway Targets Will Not Tip the Balance of the War. To be a game changer, Ukraine would need to combine these strikes with tightly coordinated ground maneuver on a scale that its forces have been unable to master so far in this war.-FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/false-promise-ukraines-deep-strikes-russia

 

With that in mind, Kyiv’s partners should now ask whether the modest military benefits are worth the escalatory risk. The answer will turn on assessments of the likelihood of expanding the conflict and on the risk tolerance of Western governments and publics. The latter is ultimately a value judgment; military analysis alone cannot dictate where to draw the line. What it can do is forecast the battlefield consequences of policy decisions. If the West lifts its restraints on Ukrainian deep strike capability, the consequences are unlikely to include a decisive change in the trajectory of the war

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Et tu David ? David Axe has turned....reports talk of postions held since 2014 have been overun without hardly any opposition.Kursk is increasingly looking like the reckless gamble of a player who is nearly out of chips. Zelenskiy is screaming for help but his 'allies' plod on with their own agendas with problems of their own at home.

The point is Russia has a lot of land they're willing to give up, which they did in WW2 to survive it, forcing the Germans to maintain long, costly supply lines.

They evacuated the citizens in Kursk and stopped the incursion's progress for the last week. They'll probably take the land back, but they're not in a big rush to do so.

 

NATO never wanted Ukraine to win it was just showing Russia how a costly a future war would be like. Anything more came as a bonus.They will in the background suing for peace not escalation. Trump or Harris - will be the same.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/08/28/if-ukraines-invasion-of-russias-kursk-oblast-was-a-diversion-it-has-failed/

 

One generous reading of Ukrainian strategy in Kursk is that the invasion was meant to draw Russian regiments away from the east, relieving the pressure on Pokrovsk. In that sense, the invasion of Kursk may have been a diversion.

If so, it failed. “The offensive in the Kursk region not only failed to prompt the redeployment of some Russian forces from Donetsk, but also exacerbated the shortage of [Ukrainian] personnel in the region,” the pro-Ukraine Conflict Intelligence Team concluded.

Instead of rushing its best troops into Kursk to blunt the Ukrainian advance, the Kremlin scraped together a motley counter-invasion force, including many young and poorly trained conscripts. These reinforcements have slowed but not halted the Ukrainian invasion. More importantly for Russian strategy, they’ve allowed the Kremlin to keep its eastern forces intact.

Edited by beautifulthailand99
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...