Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Hello everyone,

We are dealing with a situation where a crime was committed, but we suspect that the criminal has bribed the police to prevent the case from being referred to public prosecutors. The police are denying that it is a criminal matter and are claiming it is a civil issue.

Objectively, we believe it is clearly a criminal matter. However, even if the investigator agrees, their superior refuses to pursue it as a criminal case. Is there any recourse in this situation? Should we contact the Ombudsman, the CIB, the DSI, or the NACC? What should we do?

Additionally, we have evidence suggesting that the criminal gave gifts to both the police and prosecutors, although we may not be able to use this evidence in court since those people who have the evidence, would not like to come forward for fear of stepping on toes....

Any advice on which agency to contact or how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

  • Like 1
Posted

After waiting for a year for the police to forward our case to the public prosecutor, our lawyers have now suggested that we file the civil claim first instead of the criminal claim.

They mentioned that once the civil case is filed, the police cannot argue that the matter should be treated as a civil case since it would already be in civil court.

I assume that the judge's decision as well, which will take a few months, might compel the police to act, as the court might find that crimes were indeed committed. This would allow us to pursue a criminal case afterwards to recover full damages.

@timendres Are you suggesting that we should be cautious and possibly consider paying the police (I have no way to know if someone on our side already did) to expedite the process? If so, what if the other party offers more money to avoid prosecution, given that they possess our sizable stolen assets/revenue stream? Wouldn't this lead to a bidding war with no clear resolution? How can we navigate this situation?

  • Sad 1
Posted
13 hours ago, ElephantEgo said:

@timendres Are you suggesting that we should be cautious and possibly consider paying the police (I have no way to know if someone on our side already did) to expedite the process? If so, what if the other party offers more money to avoid prosecution, given that they possess our sizable stolen assets/revenue stream? Wouldn't this lead to a bidding war with no clear resolution? How can we navigate this situation?

 

The purpose of my post was to help illustrate the maze that you are navigating. It is twisty and treacherous.

Personally, I would never even consider any sort of "compensation" in matters such as these.

Compensation opens up another cadre of issues and potential pitfalls.

  • Agree 2
Posted
15 hours ago, ElephantEgo said:

After waiting for a year for the police to forward our case to the public prosecutor, our lawyers have now suggested that we file the civil claim first instead of the criminal claim.

They mentioned that once the civil case is filed, the police cannot argue that the matter should be treated as a civil case since it would already be in civil court.

I assume that the judge's decision as well, which will take a few months, might compel the police to act, as the court might find that crimes were indeed committed. This would allow us to pursue a criminal case afterwards to recover full damages.

@timendres Are you suggesting that we should be cautious and possibly consider paying the police (I have no way to know if someone on our side already did) to expedite the process? If so, what if the other party offers more money to avoid prosecution, given that they possess our sizable stolen assets/revenue stream? Wouldn't this lead to a bidding war with no clear resolution? How can we navigate this situation?

This does not make  sense

If you file a civil case then it remains a civil case. It will not automatically be upgraded it to a criminal case.

The case will be judged on its merits as a civil matter.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

what about TV news outlets, newspapers... just saying as they may be on the take as well

  • Like 1
Posted

Despite the title of this thread, I've decided I don't want to fight corruption (like moving mountains) but do want to fight the people who stole from us, since it was a lot of profits involved.

While @OneMoreFarang suggests giving up because the Royal Thai Police and Law Enforcement are unequivocally corrupt:
 

20 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

The police in this country are corrupt to the core.

 

In other experiences, this is not always the case. @timendres noted:
 

20 hours ago, timendres said:

There are times, and I have personally experienced a couple. where you will interact with above board officers who do their job professionally.


Especially, we can expect the authorities to be above-board if wrongdoers have already been revealed to the public, such as by judges' decisions in connected case/s.

So please do not completely give up on the Rule of Law in Thailand! Or will you argue that judges are also, all bought and paid for? Even in the higher courts? And police are not also afraid of appearing to make the wrong decisions when the facts come before a judge regarding the case they were tasked with investigating/overseeing?

I do have faith that the authorities are not only controlled by what many here allege, but also by (the appearance or intent of) being clean.

There has to be a way to slowly but surely compel authorities to do their jobs properly, without making them loose face and without rocking the boat too much. For example, a civil case which shows lots of criminal damage/intent with a breadth and depth of evidence that indicates police better quickly take a more active role, which then compels them to do so.

The point is that we want to win, slowly but surely, against the wrongdoers without stepping on everyone's toes or fighting everyone in our path. Like soft power, strong but fair and with minimal (if any) collateral damage since we have the support of all those concerned.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, ElephantEgo said:

Despite the title of this thread, I've decided I don't want to fight corruption (like moving mountains) but do want to fight the people who stole from us, since it was a lot of profits involved.

While @OneMoreFarang suggests giving up because the Royal Thai Police and Law Enforcement are unequivocally corrupt:
 

 

In other experiences, this is not always the case. @timendres noted:
 


Especially, we can expect the authorities to be above-board if wrongdoers have already been revealed to the public, such as by judges' decisions in connected case/s.

So please do not completely give up on the Rule of Law in Thailand! Or will you argue that judges are also, all bought and paid for? Even in the higher courts? And police are not also afraid of appearing to make the wrong decisions when the facts come before a judge regarding the case they were tasked with investigating/overseeing?

I do have faith that the authorities are not only controlled by what many here allege, but also by (the appearance or intent of) being clean.

There has to be a way to slowly but surely compel authorities to do their jobs properly, without making them loose face and without rocking the boat too much. For example, a civil case which shows lots of criminal damage/intent with a breadth and depth of evidence that indicates police better quickly take a more active role, which then compels them to do so.

The point is that we want to win, slowly but surely, against the wrongdoers without stepping on everyone's toes or fighting everyone in our path. Like soft power, strong but fair and with minimal (if any) collateral damage since we have the support of all those concerned.

 

Good luck with that!

Your goal sounds idealistic, and I wish you luck.

But, IMHO, you need a lot of luck to get where you want to be.

 

There are so many prominent cases in this country, with well-established facts, where justice just doesn't happen.

Look at Thaksin, look at "boss", who killed a police officer with his Ferrari, and look at many other cases. There often is no justice, even when the facts are in the open and the facts are obvious.

 

So, if you try to win and you want to spend time and money to do that, sure, go ahead. Maybe you will win. But maybe not. How would you feel in let's say 5 years when you realize you spent a lot of your time and a lot of money, and you lost. And maybe then you look back and see yourself: There was never really a chance to win. Or maybe only a 10% chance to win.

Do you accept that? Or do you want to think again and accept now that you lost. Forget about it. Don't spend more time on it and don't spend more money on it. And don't worry that someone puts a gun to your head and tells you to stop it. I know a guy who was in such a situation with that gun. He didn't like it.

 

So, think it through. And good luck.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, ElephantEgo said:

There has to be a way to slowly but surely compel authorities to do their jobs properly, without making them loose face and without rocking the boat too much. For example, a civil case which shows lots of criminal damage/intent with a breadth and depth of evidence that indicates police better quickly take a more active role, which then compels them to do so.

 

The single most important step in solving this problem is to provide adequate salaries to officers.

Without this, the problem cannot even begin to be solved.

Posted

If you won the civil case it should help you recoup your losses.  If they actually pay.

The criminal case would be to punish them for what they did.

What is more important to you?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/25/2024 at 5:32 AM, Will B Good said:

I guess the mistake is thinking you are dealing with 'police'.....you are dealing with one of the largest organised crime syndicates in the world.

 

Described as such by the UN some years ago, although they didn't specify 'the world', just that the Thai police force was a well-organised criminal organisation. Of course, every Thai knows that.

  • Agree 2
Posted

[quote]

...

This would allow us to pursue a criminal case afterwards to recover full damages.

...

[/quote]

 

I bold/underlined your wrong assumption......

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I like to report that Thaksin violated his bail condition. One condition is that he won't be active in politics.

Will he be arrested now?

Good on you OMF, at last someone takes serious attention!

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I think you’re dreaming. A Thai stealing from a farang isn’t considered a big deal by Thais. Some actually like it as they don’t like foreigners making money in their land. Chances are they’ll make your life hell especially if the police are on the take. In their eyes you’re not as entitled as they are. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Regardless of what crime in your eyes may have been committed. If you do tread on the wrong toes be it in the criminal or civil court. Because corruption knows no boundaries. One question you should ask yourself is.

 

How much value do you put on your life?

 

Something could happen to you long before the case reaches the courts. All depends on who's involved and the depths they will go to, to avoid being caught out.  

  • Like 2
Posted

I wonder if you could get the wheels of justice moving by involving social media somehow. seems like some cases that are initially DOA are taken up only after it's brought to the attention of the public. I don't know where to start with that, but a number of victims in previous news couldn't get any action until they approached organizations like Samui Survive, etc.

Posted
7 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Good luck with that!

Your goal sounds idealistic, and I wish you luck.

But, IMHO, you need a lot of luck to get where you want to be.

 

There are so many prominent cases in this country, with well-established facts, where justice just doesn't happen.

Look at Thaksin, look at "boss", who killed a police officer with his Ferrari, and look at many other cases. There often is no justice, even when the facts are in the open and the facts are obvious.

 

So, if you try to win and you want to spend time and money to do that, sure, go ahead. Maybe you will win. But maybe not. How would you feel in let's say 5 years when you realize you spent a lot of your time and a lot of money, and you lost. And maybe then you look back and see yourself: There was never really a chance to win. Or maybe only a 10% chance to win.

Do you accept that? Or do you want to think again and accept now that you lost. Forget about it. Don't spend more time on it and don't spend more money on it. And don't worry that someone puts a gun to your head and tells you to stop it. I know a guy who was in such a situation with that gun. He didn't like it.

 

So, think it through. And good luck.

I got a British friend who was beaten up by a police officer. All what he wanted later was "justice". 

The end of the story was, that many of my friend's neighbours were complaining about him about his inappropriate behaviour. Forced by the police officer.

My friend was mobbed out of his house, paid a lot for a good lawyer and paid at last a fine.

The police officer walked away. Free.

My friend died shortly after this experience. His last words were "justice"😩

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

I got a British friend who was beaten up by a police officer. All what he wanted later was "justice". 

The end of the story was, that many of my friend's neighbours were complaining about him about his inappropriate behaviour. Forced by the police officer.

My friend was mobbed out of his house, paid a lot for a good lawyer and paid at last a fine.

The police officer walked away. Free.

My friend died shortly after this experience. His last words were "justice"😩

This is a very weird and confusing story.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, couchpotato said:

This is a very weird and confusing story.

Par for course for this fella.

Posted
3 hours ago, AustinRacing said:

A Thai stealing from a farang isn’t considered a big deal by Thais.

 

Not so cut and dry on that, this is Thai/Farang vs Thai/Farang.

 

6 hours ago, Puccini said:

The lack of police action where required can be reported to

http://www.ombudsman.go.th/10/eng/index1.asp

and

www.1111.go.th

 

 


Thank you for these constructive comments. We were also recommended the Ombudsman office earlier by a lawyer who previously did work for us. It seems this is a legitimate and reasonable recourse.
 

 

3 hours ago, cncltd1973 said:

I wonder if you could get the wheels of justice moving by involving social media somehow. seems like some cases that are initially DOA are taken up only after it's brought to the attention of the public. I don't know where to start with that, but a number of victims in previous news couldn't get any action until they approached organizations like Samui Survive, etc.


How to contact this Samui Survive please? Or any other pertinent organizations?

Posted
8 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

 

Described as such by the UN some years ago, although they didn't specify 'the world', just that the Thai police force was a well-organised criminal organisation. Of course, every Thai knows that.

But when they have trouble they call the police anyway. Why is that?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...