Brexit: A Triumph for Britain, Despite Labour’s Naysayers
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
17
Negative people on the internet
And you won the Victoria Cross, I suppose................😆 Your baiting threads are getting a bit shaky, ol' chap, seems still no love in your life.........😢 -
14
Trouble in paradise.
The trend has nothing to do with the facts I pointed out to the poster, taking one poll out of context and showing that even with the "trend" it was false. -
51
Accident CCTV Captures Moment Driver Runs Over Drunk Swedish Tourist’s Head Outside Pattaya Bar
Is the driver blind or something? Or maybe distracted by searching for customers.... -
67
Marijuana use dramatically increases risk of dying from heart attacks and stroke, large stud
After reading "Bad Science" by Ben Goldacre ( thank you kwilco ) I am inclined to take media reports of scientific studies with an accompanying dose of scepticism. -
4
-
180
Analysis Thailand in Trouble: Expats Exit as Vietnam Steals the Show
I used to be somewhat against the idea of ‘self-insuring’ – it was the last resort, something I never wanted to consider. But now, I completely understand why people feel pushed into it. It’s not a choice, it’s a consequence. I often wonder what premiums will look like in 20 years – if they're already this high, how much further can they climb? Having comprehensive cover through my employer has been a blessing of the past years. But as is often the case, when the job ends, so does the policy. There’s no option to carry over that corporate cover to a personal plan, which means starting afresh (first hand experience of this a couple of times) – and with that, comes the realties of facing exclusions for any pre-existing conditions. Even worse: our family’s premium has almost doubled this year from to around $6,600 USD. Naturally, I refused to renew. But any new policy comes with the inevitable catch: exclusions on pre-existing conditions. Then there’s the situation with Thai insurers. Many impose a moratorium on serious illnesses like cancer. So if you go for a check-up and something suspicious shows up – say a mass on the lungs – and it’s within the six-month exclusion window, you’re out of luck. Coverage isn’t truly continuous or secure. Frankly, we’re held by the short and curlies. And as we age – like you, Spidermike – adequate cover becomes less a matter of cost and more an impossibility. This, in my view, is one of the most pressing issues for long-term expats in Thailand today. We can get our Marriage Visas, Retirement Visas, even the 20-year Thai Elite Visas… yet there’s no meaningful pathway into the national healthcare system. There should be. A system where we can contribute – financially and consistently – and in return, be entitled to care at public hospitals. Take the UK as an example: the NHS surcharge for those on a Spouse Visa or ILR is currently £1,035 per year (roughly 46,000 baht). That seems entirely reasonable – even by Thai standards – and something many of us would gladly pay for reliable, long-term security. As it stands, the only real options are: Be wealthy enough to self-fund your healthcare indefinitely, sticking with the same insurer to avoid exclusions (but you're looking at over 600,000 baht per year for such cover) Or, acquire Thai citizenship and join the public healthcare system - not possible for most who haven't been working here for 3 years. Well… there’s one more route, but wives' tend not to let us marry a Thai government official just to piggyback on their health coverage!
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now