Southport Stabbing: Child Killed and Several Injured in Taylor Swift-Themed Workshop Attack

[transam]

14 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

The first time I have ever agreed with transam!

 

....although I don't know what this means.

Police can delve into the lad's computer (PC/LT) to see if he has been reading any naughty folks stuff.................🤗

[Baht Simpson]

17 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Kids are always regarded as a legitimate target by religions one way or the other  and unlike the idiot who posted the laughing emoji I can't see the funny side 

Indocrination of children is deemed essential in all Abrahamic religions. Google "children speaking in tongues video" to see how bad it is. 

[simple1]

3 hours ago, James105 said:

 

Just stating a fact.  I can't help it if you don't like facts and the fact is there is no EDL any more.   

 

Yes, there was violence in Southport.   People were rightly angry that someone (again either a 1st or 2nd generation immigrant) killed 3 little girls.  Starmer, because he is an out of touch moron, instead of expressing any kind of understanding of the root cause of that anger decided he would light the touch paper and add fuel to the anger.     

 

Let me educate you on the "far right" as this is a very specific political ideology that promotes racial supremacy, genocide, neo-nazism and fascism.   The British people detest the "far right" and sacrificed so much to defeat it in the 1940s.   It is not "far right" to be angry that 3 little girls were killed.   False information can be defeated very easily with factual information and speculation is still rife about the motives of the attacker as showing photos of an innocent looking 10 year old choir boy who did an appearance on the BBC for (ironically) children in need are just fuelling even more conspiracies that the real motives are being covered up.   

 

Definition/s of Far Right have shifted since WW11 to reflect current political movement and the context within society. e.g....

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics

 

Another scenario is the actual Far Right in today's political environment endeavouring to define Nazism as Socialism in attempted deflection of truth.

Edited August 3 by simple1

[josephbloggs]

I think this might help us understand the far right.

(Just for fun)
 

 

[Will B Good]

Just now, josephbloggs said:

I think this might help us understand the far right.

(Just for fun)
 

 

 

 

I have always advocated that these morons....football 'fans' mostly....should be allowed to remain in the ground after a match for an hour.....unpoliced.....but they pay their own medical bills afterwards.

 

It would be interesting to see how many would take up such an offer.

[BarraMarra]

Reports in most MSM in the UK have reported many towns and cities are braced for riots over the weekend. If you or me stands on the same street with a yob throwing bricks and damaging property your a thug and a racist and a far right member who needs to be locked up. Tarring anyone on the street with the same brush. The do-gooders have already stated this monster is Mentally connected. I and many others think the Death Penalty must be in place for Child killers, the likes of Ian Huntly who killed 2 young girls a few years ago, recently a jealous ex boyfriend killed a mum and her 2 daughters with a crossbow. These Monsters do not deserve to live comfortably in a prison cell. They should be put to sleep like a pet in a vets clinic. If your living in the UK or paying taxes remember you will be paying for these Monsters while they rot in Prison. Make no mistake the Southport Monster will be lucky to survive once he is incarcerated believe it or not there is a rule within prison cons that Child killers are number one targets. Inside Prison there hated.

[BarraMarra]

Why the Sad Emoji ?

 

[James105]

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

I think this might help us understand the far right.

 

 

The imaginary and mythical "far right" klaxon!

 

Since you are sharing links about understanding the "far right" lets see if you can answer some simple questions about the "far right":

 

1. Are the "far right" stabbing and murdering kids?

2. Do the "far right" make up 90% of the MI5 terrorist watchlist?

3. Do the "far right" blow up buses and concerts?

4. Are the "far right" mass grooming white girls?

5. Are the "far right" roaming the streets with machetes? 

6. Are the "far right" in the room with you now?  

[josephbloggs]

1 minute ago, James105 said:

 

The imaginary and mythical "far right" klaxon!

 

Since you are sharing links about understanding the "far right" lets see if you can answer some simple questions about the "far right":

 

1. Are the "far right" stabbing and murdering kids?

2. Do the "far right" make up 90% of the MI5 terrorist watchlist?

3. Do the "far right" blow up buses and concerts?

4. Are the "far right" mass grooming white girls?

5. Are the "far right" roaming the streets with machetes? 

6. Are the "far right" in the room with you now?  

 

Quote

Why the Sad Emoji ?

I can add another couple:

7. Do the "far right" have no sense of humour?

8. Are they snowflakes who get upset at emojis and satirical videos?

[James105]

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

 

I can add another couple:

7. Do the "far right" have no sense of humour?

8. Are they snowflakes who get upset at emojis and satirical videos?

 

I can answer these!!!

 

7.  Things that do not exist have no sense of humour.

8. Things that do not exist do not get upset.  

[candide]

Why is the far right now ashamed to be far right? 😁

[tonbridgebrit]

8 hours ago, James105 said:

 

You make a good point.   Unfortunately precedent has been set that in order for people to be listened to and get what they want then rioting is the way as was demonstrated in the BLM riots and the Harehills riots more recently.   It's a shame that those who are the most vociferous now about the white people expressing their anger and rioting were so, so quiet when it was other ethnicities doing so.   It's hard to take anyone seriously who have such obvious double standards, up to and including the PM who actually bent the knee to the BLM rioters.   

BLM riots ??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom

The vast bulk of the BLM demonstrations that took place in Britain in 2020 (because of George Floyd getting killed ) were peaceful protests. When bearing in mind the large scale of the BLM demonstrations, very few police vehicles were set on fire. And there were very few cases of police in riot gear and shields, having bricks thrown at them.

Right now as we speak, if people in Britain want to go on peaceful marches, marches and demonstrations where they are protesting against the increasing numbers of Muslims and/or other coloureds in Britain, well, if people want to do this, I say, let them.  What we don't want to see is people setting police cars and vans on fire, and we don't want to see bricks being thrown at riot police.

By the way, where are the mass demonstrations, vast crowds of peaceful protestors, protesting against Muslims and/or other coloureds ? I don't think there are many. What we are seeing is groups of men, drinking alcohol, and fighting with riot police.

[tonbridgebrit]

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/taylor-swift-fans-crowdfunder-southport-rioters-shame-182427532.html

Meanwhile, Taylor Swift fans are raising money for the victims of the stabbings.  The person behind the crowdfunding has said "There's absolutely no justification for what they've done. They are absolutely horrendous, and they should hang their heads in shame.”  The comment is aimed at those who burnt police cars and did the riot.

How comes people are condemning the action being done by the rioters ? Because, because they know that the rioters are actually bad people.

And underneath this bit of writing, is a horrible picture.

Edited August 3 by tonbridgebrit

[James105]

9 minutes ago, tonbridgebrit said:

BLM riots ??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom

The vast bulk of the BLM demonstrations that took place in Britain in 2020 (because of George Floyd getting killed ) were peaceful protests. When bearing in mind the large scale of the BLM demonstrations, very few police vehicles were set on fire. And there were very few cases of police in riot gear and shields, having bricks thrown at them.

Right now as we speak, if people in Britain want to go on peaceful marches, marches and demonstrations where they are protesting against the increasing numbers of Muslims and/or other coloureds in Britain, well, if people want to do this, I say, let them.  What we don't want to see is people setting police cars and vans on fire, and we don't want to see bricks being thrown at riot police.

By the way, where are the mass demonstrations, vast crowds of peaceful protestors, protesting against Muslims and/or other coloureds ? I don't think there are many. What we are seeing is groups of men, drinking alcohol, and fighting with riot police.

 

"police vehicles were set on fire".  Are you trying to get a job at CNN?  

 

[stevenl]

3 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

"police vehicles were set on fire".  Are you trying to get a job at CNN?  

 

Wasn't the discussion about riots in the UK? Why bring up the US here?

[Foxx]

There are now reports of a 13 year old boy in Leicester (an area with a large Muslim population) being charged with multiple offences of a sexual nature.  I guess they start them young there.

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/boy-13-charged-multiple-sexual-29669857

 

Let the rioting begin (or recommence).

 

[Bday Prang]

4 hours ago, simple1 said:

Definition/s of Far Right have shifted since WW11 to reflect current political movement and the context within society.

              The definition of  right wing ,  far right or  extreme right,  fascist and other such words have not changed, but  the terms are so misused that their real meanings have long since been forgotten,  The phrases are now used, primarily to describe anything and anybody that a certain faction of society does not approve of or agree with.

             These phrases are considered by those who habitually misuse them as the ultimate put downs , right up alongside racist or homophobe with an assumed impact  similar to accusations of witchcraft and normally delivered with a similar zealousness.

              In the minds of those who throw theses words around , those who they target instantly become nullified and discredited, which conveniently removes any perceived need to discuss things sensibly, a skill most of then don't possess. 

              "Stopping words"  I call them, they are commonly used to stop discussions when things are not going too well 

               When people like Nigel Farage are described as "extreme right wing"  the words lose their intended impact in the minds of normal people as the grammatical misuse is obvious, those making such comments naturally lose any credibility they think they had  

[Bday Prang]

4 minutes ago, Foxx said:

I guess they start them young there.

not really , I overheard two muzzers talking, one was having trouble with his wife,  Hot flushes, mood swings, headaches, general irritability,  etc the other guy was trying to console him," the menopause can be a difficult  time" he said, "you have to understand its not easy for them" ,

"Menopause"?  said the first guy, somewhat shocked, " I'll deal with that when it eventually happens"  " lets just hope its not as bad as this puberty business"

[mokwit]

2 hours ago, candide said:

Why is the far right now ashamed to be far right? 😁

 

32 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

              The definition of  right wing ,  far right or  extreme right,  fascist and other such words have not changed, but  the terms are so misused that their real meanings have long since been forgotten,  The phrases are now used, primarily to describe anything and anybody that a certain faction of society does not approve of or agree with.

             These phrases are considered by those who habitually misuse them as the ultimate put downs , right up alongside racist or homophobe with an assumed impact  similar to accusations of witchcraft and normally delivered with a similar zealousness.

              In the minds of those who throw theses words around , those who they target instantly become nullified and discredited, which conveniently removes any perceived need to discuss things sensibly, a skill most of then don't possess. 

              "Stopping words"  I call them, they are commonly used to stop discussions when things are not going too well 

               When people like Nigel Farage are described as "extreme right wing"  the words lose their intended impact in the minds of normal people as the grammatical misuse is obvious, those making such comments naturally lose any credibility they think they had  

Very well put, and we can see who is using these tactics on this web board and it is obvious why: 'conveniently removes any perceived need to discuss things sensibly, a skill most of then don't possess.'

Edited August 3 by mokwit

[mokwit]

45 minutes ago, tonbridgebrit said:

When bearing in mind the large scale of the BLM demonstrations, very few police vehicles were set on fire.

Oh that's allright then, only a few police vehicles WERE SET ON FIRE. If I am responding seriously to satire, let me know.

[Bday Prang]

3 hours ago, James105 said:

 

I can answer these!!!

 

7.  Things that do not exist have no sense of humour.

8. Things that do not exist do not get upset.  

Its the left that has no sense of humour, many comedians in the UK have either had to retire or completely change their routines .

A show by Chubby Brown was actually cancelled by sheffield council, can you actually believe that a council considered its self fit to decide that grown adults would not be permitted to see the show.

The problem is that they see a "victim" in every joke, but they don't understand the concept of "joke"

[Bday Prang]

1 minute ago, mokwit said:

Oh that's allright then, only a few police vehicles WERE SET ON FIRE. If I am responding seriously to satire, let me know.

let us  not forget for one moment  that not all incidents receive the same media coverage 

[mokwit]

2 hours ago, candide said:

Why is the far right now ashamed to be far right? 😁

Normal people are angry at being called "Far Right" just because they don't support mass immigration, top down enforced multiculturalism or Woke Progressiveism. I get annoyed at being called "Far Right" because to me far right means the National Front of the '70's, not anybody who doesn't support mass immigration, top down enforced multiculturalism or Woke Progressiveism. It is a filthy political strategy of the Left smearing anybody who opposes their views as "Far Right" to paint a negative picture of any opposition., but then what would you expect when they are using tactics developed by the Bolsheviks, and we know what kind of people they were, don't we children.

[mokwit]

5 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

The problem is that they see a "victim" in every joke, but they don't understand the concept of "joke"

Comedy has defined limits and if a comedian oversteps them it doesn't sit well with the audience, unfortunately there is now a "opinion corridor" that the Left tries to force on the population. Yes it has a name because it is a tactic and tactics have names.

Edited August 3 by mokwit

[Bday Prang]

30 minutes ago, Foxx said:

There are now reports of a 13 year old boy in Leicester (an area with a large Muslim population) being charged with multiple offences of a sexual nature.  I guess they start them young there.

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/boy-13-charged-multiple-sexual-29669857

 

Let the rioting begin (or recommence).

 

was it with a goat?  were the RSPCA involved?

[stevenl]

5 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Normal people are angry at being called "Far Right" just because they don't support mass immigration, top down enforced multiculturalism or Woke Progressiveism. I get annoyed at being called "Far Right" because to me far right means the National Front of the '70's, not anybody who doesn't support mass immigration, top down enforced multiculturalism or Woke Progressiveism. It is a filthy political strategy of the Left smearing anybody who opposes their views as "Far Right" to paint a negative picture of any opposition., but then what would you expect when they are using tactics developed by the Bolsheviks, and we know what kind of people they were, don't we children.

The irony 

 

Did you already condemn the rioters?

[Bday Prang]

3 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Comedy has defined limits and if a comedian oversteps them it doesn't sit well with the audience.

Exactly, no comedian wants to offend his audience, so comedians are effectively self censoring by necessity, no need for a third party to be involved

[simple1]

39 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

              The definition of  right wing ,  far right or  extreme right,  fascist and other such words have not changed, but  the terms are so misused that their real meanings have long since been forgotten,  The phrases are now used, primarily to describe anything and anybody that a certain faction of society does not approve of or agree with.

             These phrases are considered by those who habitually misuse them as the ultimate put downs , right up alongside racist or homophobe with an assumed impact  similar to accusations of witchcraft and normally delivered with a similar zealousness.

              In the minds of those who throw theses words around , those who they target instantly become nullified and discredited, which conveniently removes any perceived need to discuss things sensibly, a skill most of then don't possess. 

              "Stopping words"  I call them, they are commonly used to stop discussions when things are not going too well 

               When people like Nigel Farage are described as "extreme right wing"  the words lose their intended impact in the minds of normal people as the grammatical misuse is obvious, those making such comments naturally lose any credibility they think they had  

 

Disagree. The term ' far right' in today's society has a different context as applied to fascist movements during WW11. Also I don't consider the term a 'stopping word', just consider those that it is applied to more often than not attempt to deflect and blame 'leftists' and so on, yet others are very proud such as White Supremacists, Great Replacement ideologues etc. 

[mokwit]

There's a hashtag trending on x/twitter called #farrightthugsunite  our resident political commissars should get on over there and see what kind of people they are.

Edited August 3 by mokwit

[stuandjulie]

All the posts here from people saying it is not the right wing, the EDL no longer exist (bull) all seem very butt hurt they are considered right wing fascist thugs,

Well for 1 I would like to apologise to you all, perhaps you all would prefer something like Brain dead lowlifes ? It saves your poor hurt feelings.