Jump to content

Thai defence minister demands US offset details for F-16 jets


Recommended Posts

Btw:  Thailand is about to find out how "The Most Advanced 4th Generation Fighter In The World" (F16 Block 70/72) compares against a peer adversary in Ukraine.  $$$Cha-Ching$$$

Hope they don't end up with buyer's remorse. 

 

Screenshotfrom2024-08-0110-31-06.png.3cee7d7ce1fd422b4e003ae77f840546.png

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, webfact said:

the Thai government mandates that the armed forces consider other reciprocal benefits offered by prospective suppliers

Mmmm, wonder what's involved in that.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, retarius said:

So it's F16s then? These military guys couldn't organise a booze-up in a brewery. "Booze-up" doesn't;t sound quite right somehow.....but you get my meaning./

I think you mean PISS UP in a brewery. Yes piss is an allowed word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Sounds like the US are not really fussed or actively looking for a way out.

Yes, they would be wise to walk away from it. Security aspects vis-à-vis China impossible to manage.

 

The Gripen is supposed to be pretty good (though for what that's relevant to Thailand?) and probably cheaper than the F16 variant.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it not be FAR BETTER to just put all this money towards the building of a few Nuclear Warheads and the missiles required to lob the bombs into the territories of potential adversaries?

 

No need to do so much pilot training.

And, no need to waste money on maintenance of planes, either.

 

Far more cost effective solution.

 

Problem solved.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they end up getting these new jets, the best possible use I can think of for them would be to attack the Burmese Army and get rid of them once and for all. It seems like they are on their last knees anyway, as the people have risen up and have made mincemeat out of their positions lately. Thankfully they are failing, their moral bankruptcy is being exposed, and the people are saying absolutely not to these super corrupt creeps. 

 

But instead the Thai banks continue to assist these corrupt generals in raping the Burmese treasury. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

offset policy related to acquiring F-16 fighter jets by today.

 

Whatever the offset I expect the US will want payment in US Dollars, not in baht or another BRIC currency. That would poke PM Thavisin in his dedollarization policy. No Dollars no sale.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

This isn’t a small amount of money. So, we have to achieve the maximum benefit for the public interest.”

Oh dear, if you would only mean what you say.....

Skip the wasted money for the army and put it into education and road safety.

That's the maximum benefit for the public👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, connda said:

A US plane that's been around since the 1970s vs a plane rolled out by Sweden in 1996.
Personally if the Thais were smart they'd go for the Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker which is a 4th Gen jet created as a counter to these NATO variety.  They are all older designs but like submarines?  What does Thailand really need them for.  Really. 

Why support Russian War Crimes 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

Sutin emphasised the need for detailed information about offsets before reaching a decision, specifying that Washington must submit the required data by today.

Must, wants, demands... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mfd101 said:

Yes, they would be wise to walk away from it. Security aspects vis-à-vis China impossible to manage.

 

The Gripen is supposed to be pretty good (though for what that's relevant to Thailand?) and probably cheaper than the F16 variant.

The aircraft maybe cheaper, but the training needed to convert a pilot from one to the other is costly and takes time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

The aircraft maybe cheaper, but the training needed to convert a pilot from one to the other is costly and takes time

As pointed out above, RTAF already has (aging, I assume) Gripens & F16s, so either way reconversion will be necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, connda said:

Btw:  Thailand is about to find out how "The Most Advanced 4th Generation Fighter In The World" (F16 Block 70/72) compares against a peer adversary in Ukraine.  $$$Cha-Ching$$$

Hope they don't end up with buyer's remorse. 

 

Screenshotfrom2024-08-0110-31-06.png.3cee7d7ce1fd422b4e003ae77f840546.png

do you really think the US would even consider selling Thailand this Jet? Nor could Thailand afford to buy the latest model. They are most likely looking to buy something 15 to 20 years old. 

I doubt if the US really cares if they buy it or not. But for them to demand the US sends details by tomorrow is not going to happen

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, webfact said:

Sutin emphasised the need for detailed information about offsets before reaching a decision, specifying that Washington must submit the required data by today.

 

Under the offset policy, the Thai government mandates that the armed forces consider other reciprocal benefits offered by prospective suppliers as a significant factor in procuring new military equipment.

Sounds like they should be dealing with the Chinese, they're experts on offering reciprocal benefits when it comes to doing a deal.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""