Jump to content

Swift endorsement turns more voters from harris than it attracts…


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

New research published in The Journal of Sex Research suggests that while people are willing to engage in a relationship with someone who has had two or three sexual partners, when their number is higher (or less) than that, an individual begins losing appeal.

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/201612/do-you-have-the-right-number-of-ex-partners

 

Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36. 

 

So, poor Travis  is really scraping the barrel here.

 

 

 

Oh Wow....so you did your wife a favour marrying her.

 

If my body count is 60......can I now claim 180?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Oh Wow....so you did your wife a favour marrying her.

 

If my body count is 60......can I now claim 180?

 

No, it only applies to women, whatever body count they tell you, you have to multiply it by 3. It's a well known and sensible rule. Whatever body count a man tells you, you have to divide by 3. Exactly the opposite rule applies.

Edited by Cameroni
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

Elsewhere you offer sleazy allegations about alleged sex acts committed by Kamala Harris sex and now it's Taylor swift's turn.

 "Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36."

When it comes to scraping the bottom of the barrel, you should look a lot close to home. A lot closer.

 

 

Lol, post evidence for your lies, why don't you? I have not once in my life posted "sleazy allegations about alleged sex acts" by Kamala Harris. You're obviously prone to mistake posters' identity.

 

I am intrigued now though, what did she do?

  • Love It 1
Posted
Just now, Cameroni said:

 

Lol, post evidence for your lies, why don't you? I have not once in my life posted "sleazy allegations about alleged sex acts" by Kamala Harris. You're obviously prone to mistake posters' identity.

 

I am intrigued now though, what did she do?

You're right. I'm wrong. I confused you with another poster. My apologies.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

You're right. I'm wrong. I confused you with another poster. My apologies.

 

Don't worry, these things happen.  I respect your honesty for telling the truth.

 

Edited by Cameroni
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

New research published in The Journal of Sex Research suggests that while people are willing to engage in a relationship with someone who has had two or three sexual partners, when their number is higher (or less) than that, an individual begins losing appeal.

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/201612/do-you-have-the-right-number-of-ex-partners

 

Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36. 

 

So, poor Travis  is really scraping the barrel here.

 

 

 "Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36."

When it comes to scraping the bottom of the barrel, you should look a lot closer to home. A lot closer.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

 "Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36."

When it comes to scraping the bottom of the barrel, you should look a lot closer to home. A lot closer.

 

Okay, thanks.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, it only applies to women, whatever body count they tell you, you have to multiply it by 3. It's a well known and sensible rule. Whatever body count a man tells you, you have to divide by 3. Exactly the opposite rule applies.

 

 

B****r.

 

 

Oh wait.....I can claim 180 then.....?

Edited by Will B Good
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Cleary, if all that had happened in this universe, her career would long since have been toast.

 

What we don't know, and never will, is whether she'd be at $3 billion if she hadn't involved herself.

 

Edit:  We also don't know if her next foray into the political side will be the one that tanks her career.  It's happened before to celebrities.

 

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 9/15/2024 at 3:10 PM, riclag said:

a whopping 20% said they are “somewhat” or “much less likely” to vote for former President Donald Trump’s opponent now that Swift has spoken”

That is just the Trumpers saying that. They were never going to vote for Harris anyway. 
 

Fake news.

  • Agree 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

B****r.

 

 

Oh wait.....I can claim 180 then.....?

 

No I would estimate you at 20 at most, probably below..

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

To the person that gave me a laugh emoji for that, you are IMO a very sad and pathetic individual. Too gutless to actually quote me and explain what you find so amusing.

 

I quite agree, taking care of sick people is far more honourable than shaking it off for 12 guys and stealing pocket money from 12 year olds.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Thank you.

 

My great pleasure.

 

Now, let's look at Swift's abilities in the singing department:

 

"Reviews of Swift's early country albums criticized her vocals as weak and strained compared to those of other female country singers"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift

 

So her singing style is "conversational"...She can't even sing! She chats!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift

 

Like all female pop singers do in their early careers, Swift traded off her looks and sex appeal.

 

If Taylor Swift looked like Rosie O'Donnel, how many records would she sell? Precisely zero.

Edited by Cameroni
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, placeholder said:

 "Swift has had 12 exes that we know of, which means her real body count is probably 36."

 

 

Wow, that is more than one for every year since she was born, and of course, I don't think she started shagging right out of the stroller.

 

Me think she has been very active

  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

What we don't know, and never will, is whether she'd be at $3 billion if she hadn't involved herself.

 

Edit:  We also don't know if her next foray into the political side will be the one that tanks her career.  It's happened before to celebrities.

By the same token, we also don't know if it will increase her popularity, especially worldwide, where Trump is a very unpopular figure.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Wow, that is more than one for every year since she was born, and of course, I don't think she started shagging right out of the stroller.

 

Me think she has been very active

 

She has been very active. And whilst she admits to 12 exes, those  are just the ones everyone knows about. The guys she really had fun with she has to keep them quiet.

 

It has to be more than 12.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

My great pleasure.

 

Now, let's look at Swift's abilities in the singing department:

 

"Reviews of Swift's early country albums criticized her vocals as weak and strained compared to those of other female country singers"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift

 

So her singing style is "conversational"...She can't even sing! She chats!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift

 

Like all female pop singers do in their early careers, Swift traded off her looks and sex appeal.

 

If Taylor Swift looked like Rosie O'Donnel, how many records would she sell? Precisely zero.

Another party who thinks contrary to fact statements constitute valid evidence.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

By the same token, we also don't know if it will increase her popularity, especially worldwide, where Trump is a very unpopular figure.

 

Still, I would contend there's a lot more downside than upside to stepping outside what she knows.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

 

And given that it seems to be mainly right wingers who are find something negative in the number of partners a young woman has had, me also thinks you've got less than nothing.

 

No, it's not just "right wingers". Scientists found this too:

 

New research published in The Journal of Sex Research suggests that while people are willing to engage in a relationship with someone who has had two or three sexual partners, when their number is higher (or less) than that, an individual begins losing appeal.

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/201612/do-you-have-the-right-number-of-ex-partners

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

where Trump is a very unpopular figure.

 

With the radical left, to which I count you.

 

Looks like you have NOTHING

Edited by CallumWK
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I quite agree, taking care of sick people is far more honourable than shaking it off for 12 guys and stealing pocket money from 12 year olds.

Another right wing party ignorant of Taylor Swift's demographic.

image.png.107a9db5e5cc42bb8d26d11c78da5a23.png

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372971/taylor-swift-fans-by-generation/

And given your comments about her sex life, it's not wonder that the right wing politics has been losing the support of women.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, it's not just "right wingers". Scientists found this too:

 

New research published in The Journal of Sex Research suggests that while people are willing to engage in a relationship with someone who has had two or three sexual partners, when their number is higher (or less) than that, an individual begins losing appeal.

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/201612/do-you-have-the-right-number-of-ex-partners

 

You think that applies to high-status individuals? 

Posted

Cameroni, Thaibeachlover, and CallumWK are scraping the bottom of the barrel better than its ever done before. Trying to put Taylor Swift  down as an unsuccessful artist when its well know she is the biggest star in the last ten years.  Then even more mind blowing going after her for being promiscuous. 

 

Hey Holier than Thou brothers, have a look at how poorly Taylor is doing. 

 

Recording industryTo top it all off, IFPI, the governing body of the global music industry, announced on Wednesday that Swift was also the biggest-selling recording artist in the world last year, making her the first artist to win the award for a fourth time.

 

Becoming The Highest Grossing Tour EverIn eight months, Swift's Eras Tour did something no other artist has ever done: gross over $1 billion on a single tour. Pollstar reported the news in December 2023, stating that the 60+ shows she played in 2023 accumulated to 4.3 million tickets sold.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...