Jump to content

'Vocally anti-Trump' FBI agent leading probe of Florida assassination attempt:


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Even if there was no attempted assassination as charged, the engagement with or impeding of with the Secret Service agent on the 6th hole as charged in the indictment is enough to obtain a conviction noting especially:

Enhanced penalty as charged -- Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) ... Edited by jerrymahoney
Posted

FOX is complaining that an FBI agent who doesn't like Trump is heading the investigation but guess which judge has been assigned to try the case? Aileen Cannon. The Trump appointed, Trump-loving judge who capriciously decided to delay the federal case against  Trump, for stealing and refusing to return top secret government and military documents, until after the election.

The possible consequence of that is if Trump is reelected then he can't be tried for those crimes until January 2029, if he's still alive and he hasn't pressured any of his other appointed officials into dropping the case.


Is FOX mentioning that??? 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

Waste of time. There was no assassination attempt. 

If the roles were reversed and a disgruntled Democrat had lain in wait with a gun and was charged with an attempted assassination of Biden the conservatives would be saying.
 

It wasn't an assassination. He's not a sniper, it's not a sniper rifle, it's not an assault rifle (or an assault-style rifle), it's obviously a hunting gun and the guy was just there waiting for rabbit season to open.

Posted
3 hours ago, Guitar God said:

FOX is complaining that an FBI agent who doesn't like Trump is heading the investigation but guess which judge has been assigned to try the case? Aileen Cannon. The Trump appointed, Trump-loving judge who capriciously decided to delay the federal case against  Trump, for stealing and refusing to return top secret government and military documents, until after the election.

The possible consequence of that is if Trump is reelected then he can't be tried for those crimes until January 2029, if he's still alive and he hasn't pressured any of his other appointed officials into dropping the case.


Is FOX mentioning that??? 

Your last paragraph  opinion doesn’t mention…

 

Cannon, the U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, last month dismissed Smith'scase against Trump, ruling that it violated "the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution." 

Cannon said Smith’s appointment of special counsel was unconstitutional.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-jack-smith-appeals-dismissal-trump-mar-a-lago-case

Posted
5 hours ago, Guitar God said:

If the roles were reversed and a disgruntled Democrat had lain in wait with a gun and was charged with an attempted assassination of Biden the conservatives would be saying.
 

It wasn't an assassination. He's not a sniper, it's not a sniper rifle, it's not an assault rifle (or an assault-style rifle), it's obviously a hunting gun and the guy was just there waiting for rabbit season to open.

I think he was on a crusade to rid the world of golf cheaters, so naturally, he would start with the biggest cheater.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, riclag said:

Your last paragraph  opinion doesn’t mention…

 

Cannon, the U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, last month dismissed Smith'scase against Trump, ruling that it violated "the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution." 

Cannon said Smith’s appointment of special counsel was unconstitutional.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-jack-smith-appeals-dismissal-trump-mar-a-lago-case

Remember when Cannon ruled in favor of Trump and required a special master to examine the documents. And how the panel from the 9th circuit court harshly shot her decision down?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/25/2024 at 12:41 AM, Hummin said:

You just don't know Marxist ideas or communist countries, do you.

 

You do not understand how ridiculous it is to read Magas continously repetitive Marxist accusations against the democrats.

 

Usa might have an unfair policestate mentality, where the poor have no chance in the court system, and the rich somehow escapes serous accusation, even murder because a glow, did not fit.

Isn't this pretty much what the democrat party says?    A lot of what is on this web page is what I read in the emails the democrat party sends to me daily.

https://www.cpusa.org/party_info/socialism-in-the-usa/

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 5:35 AM, renaissanc said:

Marxists

Can you give an example of Marxists action taken by the Biden administration?

 

Perhaps you've "swallowed" the Trump bull<deleted> hook, line, and sinker.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/23/2024 at 10:00 PM, riclag said:

The Fbi by design was supposed  to mean Fidelity Bravery and Integrity.

But unfortunately because of their history involving Trump it forgot about Integrity.imop
 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s lead agent probing the second assassination attempt on former President Trump’s life allegedly posted anti-Trump rhetoric on social media, according to a whistleblower’s account to Congress last year — though the bureau calls these claims "demonstrably false."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vocally-anti-trump-fbi-agent-leading-probe-florida-assassination-attempt-whistleblower

Perhaps stop getting you're news from Trumps mouthpiece ghetto news?

 

"‘Tons of Crazy’: The Inside Story of How Fox Fell for the ‘Big Lie’"

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/11/15/big-lie-fox-news-brian-stelter-book-00127133

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 8:18 AM, Wrwest said:

Far too many folks seen unable or unwilling to recognize that an individual can actually separate their emotions from an intelligent thought process. Absolutely I oppose Trump in his being, and his documented history. Could I carry out an historically accurate study of him? Sit on a jury to weigh only the evidence presented? Yes I can. I hasten to point out that I would not be chosen to sit on that trial jury ... too much education, the defense would know that I might be able to influence my fellow jury members by the sheer ability, being a retired educator, to explain my reasoning so that all could understand.

You say you are too clever to be chosen to sit on a jury. One wonders what else you may be considered too clever to undertake.

  • Love It 1
Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 8:18 AM, Wrwest said:

Far too many folks seen unable or unwilling to recognize that an individual can actually separate their emotions from an intelligent thought process. Absolutely I oppose Trump in his being, and his documented history. Could I carry out an historically accurate study of him? Sit on a jury to weigh only the evidence presented? Yes I can. I hasten to point out that I would not be chosen to sit on that trial jury ... too much education, the defense would know that I might be able to influence my fellow jury members by the sheer ability, being a retired educator, to explain my reasoning so that all could understand.

You say you are too clever to be chosen to sit on a jury. One wonders what else you may be considered too clever to undertake.

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 9/23/2024 at 10:00 PM, riclag said:

The Fbi by design was supposed  to mean Fidelity Bravery and Integrity.

But unfortunately because of their history involving Trump it forgot about Integrity.imop

Oh, please. J. Edgar got the job because the first head of the Bureau of Investigation was corrupt. We all remember how corrupt J. Edgar was. I don't believe a single one of the heads since him have been less corrupt, and almost all agents are the same. Local police forces hate it when the feebs drop in, because they hog the glory and often spoil the cases. The Agency routinely frames people. They've never had any integrity. This guy is no worse than usual.

Edited by Acharn
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Acharn said:

Oh, please. J. Edgar got the job because the first head of the Bureau of Investigation was corrupt. We all remember how corrupt J. Edgar was. I don't believe a single one of the heads since him have been less corrupt, and almost all agents are the same. Local police forces hate it when the feebs drop in, because they hog the glory and often spoil the cases. The Agency routinely frames people. They've never had any integrity. This guy is no worse than usual.

The FBI has always been political , it wasn’t supposed to be!

The left loves them right now!

Until its one of their darlings that gets persecuted . Imop
 

 

https://time.com/6235552/the-fbi-has-always-been-political/

Edited by riclag
  • Haha 2
Posted
On 9/23/2024 at 10:00 PM, riclag said:

The Fbi by design was supposed  to mean Fidelity Bravery and Integrity.

But unfortunately because of their history involving Trump it forgot about Integrity.imop
 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s lead agent probing the second assassination attempt on former President Trump’s life allegedly posted anti-Trump rhetoric on social media, according to a whistleblower’s account to Congress last year — though the bureau calls these claims "demonstrably false."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vocally-anti-trump-fbi-agent-leading-probe-florida-assassination-attempt-whistleblower

So good of you to twist this into an Anti-Trump campaign. But hate to tell you, the FBI lost its integrity long before Trump. 

Posted
5 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

So good of you to twist this into an Anti-Trump campaign. But hate to tell you, the FBI lost its integrity long before Trump. 

Is it possible,you misunderstood?

The story revolves around this rather shady 3 letter  organization and the higher ups that seem to have a axe to grind (allegedly posting anti Trump rhetoric on social media in the past).
How the hell does this guy get elevated to this position? Imop
 

Posted
On 9/28/2024 at 12:25 PM, Thingamabob said:

You say you are too clever to be chosen to sit on a jury. One wonders what else you may be considered too clever to undertake.

I did not use the word "clever" in my post. It seems to me that you are making a judgement that I am motivated by ego. That is not true. Feel free to do some reading on jury selection. There is a reason lawyers shy away from people with above average education. Do keep in mind the average reading level in the USA is at the 7th-8th grade level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...