Jump to content

Polish Passenger Threatens to Bomb Plane Mid-air on Flight to Bangkok


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Following the investigation, it was determined that the woman had not intended to carry out an act of terrorism or actually plant a bomb. Her statement was deemed a violation of aviation security regulations but without malicious intent. Thai VietJet has decided not to press charges, and the passenger is set to depart Thailand to return to Poland.

 

What the Fark, no Wai and a 500 baht fine, she got off lighter than the Thai's do, IMO 🙂

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, SingAPorn said:

Why on earth did this wacked polish female do such a stupid thing ? Drugs or to much booze ?

 

Hope she is deported and banned from the kingdom for 30 years as she is a threat to public peace.

 

She needs banging up, not deporting!

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, renaissanc said:

I don't know what the circumstances were, but most probably common sense and compassion prevailed. I know many expats here will now scream and complain vociferously to the heavens that I referred to compassion. Still, compassion and unconditional love are perhaps the core values and qualities that are missing most in people, companies, and the world. What a difference they can make!

 

Oh, come now... there there... You only scared the s*!t out of 121 passengers and crew, inconvenienced them all for a couple of hours during a baggage search, invoked a security nightmare, and possibly put someone off ever flying again due to your pathetic hoax, but it's OK, everyone loves you and be on your merry way.

 

Yeah, whatever snowflake! You're part of the problem that enables these morons!

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Her statement was deemed a violation of aviation security regulations but without malicious intent. Thai VietJet has decided not to press charges

The legal authority is Thailand police, not Thai VietJet.

According to Thailand's law on offences committed against air navigation, anyone who knowingly communicates false information causing panic on an aircraft in flight is liable to imprisonment for up to 5 years or a fine of US$6,150 on conviction.

"Without malicious intent" does not negate that a crime was committed nor does it mitigate possible passenger panic (whether outward or inward). Only that the penalty under the law  can be mitigated.

As such I'd think the Thai police on its own initiative can and must charge the subject Polish woman. An out of court plea bargain stemming from the woman's admission to the crime can conclude for example a fine, deportation, etc.

What appears to me is that potentially Thai VietJet by giving the subject woman a "pass" was looking out for its own financial position. Ask yourself this: Will Thailand police accepting Thai VietJet's absolution of a possible Thailand federal crime deter future similar crimes?

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Maybe she spoke in Polish and was telling someone she is going to Thailand for some bom-bom. 

The accent is hard to understand sometimes.

  • Haha 2
Posted

I know the seats are cramped on the airplane lady but that is taking it to far.

 

It is to late now but how about making her stand at an arriving gate and say "Sorry" to each and

every passenger as they depart the flight at a minimum.

Posted

Viet jet will not be prosecuting the woman? If the threat was enough to involve the authorities and activate emergency procedures and  possibly causing distress to all the passengers then action should most definitely have been taken if not by the airline then the respective air authorities. She made the threat and is immediately allowed on another aircraft. Id make her travel back by either road or sea as a lesson. Cant mess about with bomb word in this day and age

Posted

Or was there a mistake in translation?

 

I feel that if she had really made a terrorist threat, the airline would have felt obliged to pursue all necessary legal and court action.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, renaissanc said:

We don't know what happened. Maybe she was drunk or was having an emotional argument with her spouse and said it by mistake or to annoy him, and what she said was overheard by a flight attendant.

According to the OP:

......the bomb threat, which was reportedly made via a mobile phone....... 

🙄

 

Posted
4 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

 

What the Fark, no Wai and a 500 baht fine, she got off lighter than the Thai's do, IMO 🙂

 

 

Not to mention foreigners who commit the apparently far more serious crime of missing a 90-day report!

  • Haha 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

IMG_6054.jpeg
Picture of the passenger detained at Suvarnabhumi.

 

The incident unfolded on September 26, aboard VZ 961, a Thai Vietjet flight traveling from Da Nang to Suvarnabhumi International Airport, when a Polish woman, identified as Ms. Myrcik, allegedly threatened to bomb the plane mid-flight. The flight had 121 passengers and six crew members on board.

 

At approximately 14:45 the captain of the aircraft informed Suvarnabhumi ATC (air traffic control) about the bomb threat, which was reportedly made via a mobile phone. Authorities immediately activated emergency action plans and protocols to ensure the safety of the aircraft, airport, passengers and crew.

 

 

 


Upon receiving the threat, officials at Suvarnabhumi prepared for an emergency landing and directed the plane to Isolated Parking 1, a designated safe zone for such incidents. After landing in Bangkok, a tactical response team swiftly separated passengers, crew, and baggage for a thorough search. Ms. Myrcik was promptly detained and handed over to Suvarnabhumi police for questioning.

 

Despite the gravity of the threat, which turned out to be false,  airport officials praised the captain and ground crew for their composed and professional handling of the situation. The quick response ensured that there was no panic among the passengers, and operations at Suvarnabhumi Airport continued without disruption.

 

According to the Aviation Offenses Act, B.E. 2558 (2015), Section 22, anyone who knowingly makes a false statement or sends false information that causes or is likely to cause alarm to passengers aboard an aircraft in flight shall be subject to imprisonment for no more than 5 years, a fine of up to 200,000 baht (two hundred thousand baht), or both.

 

If the act causes danger to the safety of the aircraft while in flight, the offender shall be subject to imprisonment for 5 to 15 years or a fine ranging from 200,000 baht (two hundred thousand baht) to 600,000 baht (six hundred thousand baht), or both.


Thai VietJet Official Statement
 

Thai VietJet clarified the facts regarding a bomb threat on a flight, which turned out to be false.

 

The incident occurred on flight VZ961 from Da Nang to Suvarnabhumi Airport, Bangkok. The crew received a report from a foreign passenger claiming there was an explosive device on board. The crew immediately followed safety procedures and contacted security personnel at the destination airport.

 

After the flight landed safely, the aircraft was moved to a designated secure area as specified by the airport for a thorough inspection of passengers and luggage. The passengers were then escorted to the terminal in an orderly manner. Relevant authorities also conducted a detailed safety check of the aircraft.

 

IMG_6057.jpeg


 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-09-26

 

Cigna Banner (500x100) (1).png

 

image.png

Unfortuneately headline doesnt match the story says it was a false complaint per the story 

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

 

What the Fark, no Wai and a 500 baht fine, she got off lighter than the Thai's do, IMO 🙂

 

Basket of fruit?

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, kiwikeith said:

If they aren't pressing charges, something was definitely messed up 

 

Yes, looks like a case of misunderstanding or miscommunication, which is too embarrassing for them.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Montnoveau said:

 

Yes, looks like a case of misunderstanding or miscommunication, which is too embarrassing for them.

Yes, very likely. Lost in translation, obviously. 

Asian but Polish woman said something in %what language% so vietnamese flight attendant took as the threat. Later when semi-sober Ambassador arrived he translated what did she mean "in fact really"

Embarrassing indeed!

 

PS: Polish citizenship is about 10K Euro through that UA hole.

Posted (edited)

She got off lucky if she meant it. If she had done that at home, she would be facing a far harsher punishment.

Edited by phetphet
  • Confused 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, phetphet said:

She got off lucky if she meant it. If she had done that at home, she would be facing a far harsher punishment.

 

Depends on what home?

She's an Asian immigrant w/Polish passport. Is it her native home at Da Nang or new home at Gdansk (Danzig)? 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

According to the OP:

......the bomb threat, which was reportedly made via a mobile phone....... 

🙄

 

 

So a wrong translation from google, as others said she just wanted a drink 

 

https://poseidn.com  Drink Bombs - Cocktails, Hot chocolate and Tea. EASY. DELICIOUS. BEAUTIFUL.

 

😁

 

Edited by BE88
  • Haha 2
Posted

You guys shouting jail for her ban from Thailand, but what about with people with mental issues, schizophrenia, depression or Tourette syndrome. Quick to judge without knowing full story.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 9/27/2024 at 8:14 AM, renaissanc said:

I am guessing, but I expect that Thailand does not have jurisdiction over what happens on a Vietnamese plane.

 

Thai VietJet is a Thai airline with Thai crews, and the incident apparently took place in Thai airspace.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...