V P Debate

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Your hero chose an auspicious time to retire.

His boss will never and has never had any possibility of being conscripted to serve in unpleasant places, yet will be in a position to sent thousands of boys to die. Seems somewhat unfair to me.

It seems unfair that foreigners impose themselves on discussions of US policy, but here we are.

[Lacessit]

10 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   I have absolutely no opinion  on that as its the first time that I ve ever thought about Donald and Melania having sex .

   But for you to be having more sex than Donald does, that would require Donald to be having no sex at all , not for the last few years 

Congratulations, you win the non sequitur award for this week.

[Lacessit]

7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Being a fat pig myself I cannot but agree.

 

But unlike Harris voters, my fat is around my waist.

It's intelligent to vote for a lying grifting sexual predator and felon, who tried everything to overthrow a legitimately elected government?

 

CAT scan of your skull please, I want to know if it is all bone.

[Nick Carter icp]

23 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Congratulations, you win the non sequitur award for this week.

 

   You claimed that you have more sex than Donald Trump does , then you stated you don't think that Donald Trump has any sex at all .

   Did I misunderstand something ?

[Patong2021]

8 hours ago, retayl said:

If you’re a Republican Vance won if you’re a Democrat it was Walz. American politics has lost all objectivity and has been reduced to a level that would shame a kindergarten.

 

And if you are a fair and disinterested observer, neither won in an exchange that overall was dull, and an exercise in repeating rehearsed statements. I wasn't impressed by either one. Vance comes off as a sinister, nasty man with a chip on his shoulder. Waltz comes off as a dimwit gladhander who is in way over his head. I would be concerned if either one  became President of the USA.

[Hanaguma]

7 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I guess I'm biased, there's no doubt about that, but to me Walz comes across as being sincere and earnest, at least as sincere and earnest as a politician at his level can be. Whereas Vance seems to be come across as being insincere, phony, pandering to his political master, and not very believable, nor likable. In addition he is a pathological liar, just like Trump. 

 

 

Alternately;

 

Joined the Marines, honored his full commitment, served in a combat zone.

 

Weekend warrior for decades. Bailed when called to serve overseas. 

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

It's intelligent to vote for a lying grifting sexual predator and felon, who tried everything to overthrow a legitimately elected government?

 

CAT scan of your skull please, I want to know if it is all bone.

Better him than a baby killing, paedophiliac antisemitic fascist. The appeals court will take care of the lawfare, Kamal will still be what she is.

 

[Berkshire]

20 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Better him than a baby killing, paedophiliac antisemitic fascist. The appeals court will take care of the lawfare, Kamal will still be what she is.

 

That's pretty extreme lying, even by your standards.  By the way, is Melania Trump a "baby killer"?  She has publically proclaim that she's pro-abortion rights.

[Yagoda]

15 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

That's pretty extreme lying, even by your standards.  By the way, is Melania Trump a "baby killer"?  She has publically proclaim that she's pro-abortion rights.

Well of course, unless she disavows laws like the ones in Minnesota, California and Virginia which allow such things.

 

Lying. OK. Its all out there, try research. You call me a liar, I call you a supporter of babykilling, Hamas, Iran and gun seizures. I can live with that

[Berkshire]

16 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well of course, unless she disavows laws like the ones in Minnesota, California and Virginia which allow such things.

 

Lying. OK. Its all out there, try research. You call me a liar, I call you a supporter of babykilling, Hamas, Iran and gun seizures. I can live with that

Firstly, there is no state in the USA that allows murder of babies already born.  As for Hamas, Iran, gun seizures, you've got no proof that VP Harris supports any of that.  But keep up with the lies if it makes you feel better about yourself. 

[Yagoda]

33 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Firstly, there is no state in the USA that allows murder of babies already born.  As for Hamas, Iran, gun seizures, you've got no proof that VP Harris supports any of that.  But keep up with the lies if it makes you feel better about yourself. 

I would post the video links and statutes but you arent interested in the truth so enjoy your own reality. Dont forget to vote!

[In Full Agreement]

15 hours ago, novacova said:

Walz friends with school shooters Freudian slip…

 

 

On 10/2/2024 at 8:16 PM, theblether said:

 

Never complain, never explain. 

 

Work it out for yourself. 

 

 

Well done.

 

That sounds like the logic of a two year old.

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

3 hours ago, Berkshire said:

That's pretty extreme lying, even by your standards.  By the way, is Melania Trump a "baby killer"?  She has publically proclaim that she's pro-abortion rights.

I wasn't aware that Melania had taken part in the debate. Deflecting much?

[Berkshire]

23 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I wasn't aware that Melania had taken part in the debate. Deflecting much?

I was responding to another guy, had nothing to do with you.  But if you want to talk about the VP debate, sure.  This opinion page reflects my feelings about Vance.  Very slick, very polished....but still a lying conman.  Just like his boss. 

 

[Like his fellow travelers in the con-man trade, Vance pretended to be a person he is not, selling views he does not hold, trying to persuade voters to believe something that is not true — anything to fuel his own political ambitions. He hoped to capitalize on the well-known penchant of Americans to “get conned again and again.”

JD Vance showed himself to have no shame, even as he gave a thoroughly shameful debate performance.]

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-jd-vance-is-a-con-artist-and-the-debate-proved-it/ar-AA1rDDeu?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c5562b185464c9fa5ce936119234056&ei=15

[thaibeachlovers]

6 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

I was responding to another guy, had nothing to do with you.

You may not be aware of it, but on an open forum like this you don't get to have an exclusive conversation, and anyone can respond to any post. If you don't want me joining in use the PM function.

 

Despite the deflection, Melania is still not in the topic.

[Berkshire]

27 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You may not be aware of it, but on an open forum like this you don't get to have an exclusive conversation, and anyone can respond to any post. If you don't want me joining in use the PM function.

 

Despite the deflection, Melania is still not in the topic.

I replied on-topic regarding the VP debate and you completely ignored that.  You'd rather talk about Melania.  Geez man, make up your mind.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, Berkshire said:

I replied on-topic regarding the VP debate and you completely ignored that.  You'd rather talk about Melania.  Geez man, make up your mind.

In general I try not to take rants seriously, which is why I didn't bother responding to that.

 

JD Vance showed himself to have no shame, even as he gave a thoroughly shameful debate performance.

 

Seriously?

[Berkshire]

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

In general I try not to take rants seriously, which is why I didn't bother responding to that.

 

JD Vance showed himself to have no shame, even as he gave a thoroughly shameful debate performance.

 

Seriously?

The author of the article explained his reasoning, but I'm guessing you won't be reading the link I provided.

[WDSmart]

22 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Then arent you concerned about the support of Kamala Harris for taxpayer funded trans surgery on male inmates, as well as her support for removal of children for parents who oppose sex change? How about her support for sex change suregery on minors?

 

You can research all of that

All that sounds good to me. Why do you oppose such things?

[Yagoda]

8 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

All that sounds good to me. Why do you oppose such things?

Probably because I am not a child abuser and beleive in parental rights

[WDSmart]

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Probably because I am not a child abuser and beleive in parental rights

Why would you think removing a child from parents who do not accept the child's choice of gender? Would you feel the same way about parents who want to castrate their son to prevent him from becoming a fully functioning adult male? 

[Yagoda]

9 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Why would you think removing a child from parents who do not accept the child's choice of gender? Would you feel the same way about parents who want to castrate their son to prevent him from becoming a fully functioning adult male? 

Childs choice of gender? Since when do children decide their "gender"? Until they are 18 they are incompetent to make those decisions.

 

I have no idea what point you are making about castration. I suppose that could happen in a place like California

[WDSmart]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Childs choice of gender? Since when do children decide their "gender"? Until they are 18 they are incompetent to make those decisions.

 

I have no idea what point you are making about castration. I suppose that could happen in a place like California

So, you are saying that a "child" under 18 has to accept whatever gender they have been assigned (presumably, at birth on their birth certificate)? What if their parents object to that? What if they are born a "girl," and their parents want them to be a "boy," so dress them and treat them that way? Are you saying in a case like that, the child shouldn't be removed and placed in protective care? And, when they turn 18, will you then allow them to decide their own gender?

The castration example was made to get you to think about this in a different way,in a way that is the reverse of the only one way you see it. You see it as a boy wanting to be a girl (or a girl wanting to be a boy), but you don't see it as parents wanting to change or disrupt their child's gender because of their beliefs. 

 

[Cameroni]

49 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

All that sounds good to me. Why do you oppose such things?

 

I'm sorry....what???

 

You think tax payer funded trans surgery is a good thing?

 

Removing children from parents  who oppose a sex change?

 

Sex change surgery for minors?

 

These are all "good" things?

 

You're not serious?

[WDSmart]

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I'm sorry....what???

 

You think tax payer funded trans surgery is a good thing?

 

Removing children from parents  who oppose a sex change?

 

Sex change surgery for minors?

 

These are all "good" things?

 

You're not serious?

I looked all of these up online in respect to how Harris and Walz are associated with them. I do think that each one of these under the right circumstances are "good" things.

[Yagoda]

29 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

So, you are saying that a "child" under 18 has to accept whatever gender they have been assigned (presumably, at birth on their birth certificate)? What if their parents object to that? What if they are born a "girl," and their parents want them to be a "boy," so dress them and treat them that way? Are you saying in a case like that, the child shouldn't be removed and placed in protective care? And, when they turn 18, will you then allow them to decide their own gender?

The castration example was made to get you to think about this in a different way,in a way that is the reverse of the only one way you see it. You see it as a boy wanting to be a girl (or a girl wanting to be a boy), but you don't see it as parents wanting to change or disrupt their child's gender because of their beliefs. 

 

Well like I said fine in  California, child abuse anywhere else. Boys are boys and girls are girl. Simple biology. 

[Cameroni]

55 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I looked all of these up online in respect to how Harris and Walz are associated with them. I do think that each one of these under the right circumstances are "good" things.

 

 

Okay, why not, in what circumstances would sex change surgery for minors be a good thing?

 

[Lacessit]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You may not be aware of it, but on an open forum like this you don't get to have an exclusive conversation, and anyone can respond to any post. If you don't want me joining in use the PM function.

 

Despite the deflection, Melania is still not in the topic.

Vance is strongly against abortion. So is Trump, in a nod to the Christian nationalists. Everyone knows he would sell his own mother for votes.

 

Melania has come out pro-abortion. You don't think that is a significant development, telling Vance to pull his head in?

[riclag]

19 hours ago, retayl said:

If you’re a Republican Vance won if you’re a Democrat it was Walz. American politics has lost all objectivity and has been reduced to a level that would shame a kindergarten.

I remember a governor’s conference , call where Trump gave praise  to Walz 

for handling the Minneapolis riots, where city blocks burned as a result of

his procrastination in calling  up the National  Guard. Trump was being gracious in not condemning him 

in front of his peers. That knucklehead's approach& appeasement  to BLM started the Summer of Love riots, the rest is history, murders, looting,fires,millions in damages .

 

[watthong]

On 10/3/2024 at 7:42 PM, Deputy7 said:

Watch FOX news and get the truth. Vance won of course!!! 
Trump/Vance 24/28!!!

 Looks like Trump/Vance 2024 is already down the sewers regardless, along with Springfield's murdered housepets.

 

But despair not, Trump/fill-in-the-blank 2028 will be here soon enough, and as they say 3rd time is the charm...Imagine Trump in another 4 years - boggle the mind - would probably beat the latest Halloween sequel.