Spreaders of Conspiracy Theories: Unmasking the Motivations Behind the Lies

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

You mean like Biden's senile, the laptop is Hunter's and there are vaccine side effects?

 

I could rattle off a hundred more, just from the past few years.  But you'd have to hold your nose and click on some non-approved sources to get wind of them.

 

Notice the furore about Harris has diverted people's attention from the laptop, and why a man that was incapable of standing again for POTUS is still POTUS.

 

Classic case of look over here while doing nefarious things over there.

[thaibeachlovers]

23 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

And yet none of the promoters of the controlled demolition claims have been able to demonstrate how it was achieved or can even  demonstrate the events they claim. There is a reason why the orders and societies of professionals  like architects, engineers and chemists reject your claims and it is  based on scientific fact.

 

For anyone familiar with demolition by explosive ( there have been umpteen VDOs about it out there ), there is a pattern of collapse that is IMO unmistakable. If it just fell over the sequence of collapsing would be very different.

 

Has anyone a better explanation of why it fell straight down, rather than sideways?

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How about the 2020 election was stolen?

Pizza Gate?

 

How about 2016 election was a Russian plot?

 

How about Trump is Hitler

[impulse]

34 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I saw it and I agree that it was a controlled demolition. I just don't know why they would do it.

 

Rummy explained it.  Sleight of hand...  To divert attention from $4 Trillion missing Pentagon dollars.

 

[bradiston]

50 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

How shallow. And Wikpedia, heavens. God forbid you read a book.

 

I guess you arent familiar with what the National Socialist platform was. Nor Leninism and Stalinism.

Why don't you read the Wikipedia article? Hypertext (as in HTML, right?) is extremely useful for following links, sources, updates, questionable entries etc etc. You don't get that from your Right Wing hand book for arguing on public forums, or Trolling for Beginners, or Ignorance, where do I sign up handbook, now do you?

 

The Wikipedia article on the Nazi party strangely enough does go into that, but because you refuse to read any "leftist, woke, libtard" links, you'll never know. So what books do you recommend I read? Nazism 101? Stalinism for beginners? How I learned to love Lenin and never look back?

 

The National Socialist party was set up to counter the Marxist Leninism version of socialism. Even though Russia and Germany were allies at the outset of WWII (the Ribbentrop/Molotov pact was a non aggression pact they invaded Poland), it didn't last long, when Hitler decided to invade Russia. Nazis and communists (Marxist Leninists) ripped each other to shreds later, quite literally. They remain to this day sworn enemies.

[Chomper Higgot]

38 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

How about 2016 election was a Russian plot?

 

How about Trump is Hitler

The 2016 election was scheduled according to the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

 

What conspiracy turns Trump into Hitler?

[bradiston]

48 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The 2016 election was scheduled according to the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

 

What conspiracy turns Trump into Hitler?

I read it as heavily ironic, not to be taken literally!

[johng]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Has anyone a better explanation of why it fell straight down, rather than sideways?

 

we all await     but in the meantime perhaps have a look here

https://ic911.org/

[johng]

37 minutes ago, bradiston said:

not to be taken literally!

So trump is not literally Hitler ? 

what to call those comparing him literally to Hitler......

conspiracy theorists ?

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, johng said:

So trump is not literally Hitler ? 

what to call those comparing him literally to Hitler......

conspiracy theorists ?

I would call them observant.

[bradiston]

1 hour ago, johng said:

So trump is not literally Hitler ? 

what to call those comparing him literally to Hitler......

conspiracy theorists ?

Comparing him literally? Explain!

[johng]

6 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Comparing him literally? Explain!

I'm sure you are intelligent enough to work it out for yourself ?   but just a hint refer to the post directly above yours in this very thread.

[bradiston]

10 minutes ago, johng said:

I'm sure you are intelligent enough to work it out for yourself ?   but just a hint refer to the post directly above yours in this very thread.

I replied to the reply to that one. My comment was addressed to you. Comparing him literally as opposed to comparing him what? Roughly? Vaguely? Allegorically? Indirectly? Approximately?

[johng]

17 minutes ago, bradiston said:

My comment was addressed to you. Comparing him literally as opposed to comparing him what? Roughly? Vaguely? Allegorically? Indirectly? Approximately?

I have not referred to him as Hilter  others have on many occasions

literally, roughly, vaguely, allegorically,indirectly and approximately

tried to tie Trump to Hitler  I suggested we call those persons "conspiracy theorist"