Got a pigeon problem? Time to break out the LASER!!!

[Dan O]

43 minutes ago, mikebike said:

No. You said, "partially right". Which she was not.

Yes,  she was right that the govt has tried to control the weather as they have made the attempts in the past with limited success but she's taking information out of context. Spatial thinking dude. 

Edited 5 hours ago by Dan O

[AndreasHG]

3 hours ago, renaissanc said:

the US Military most probably has a secret project to try to manipulate the weather through satellites

 

LOL. What kind of secret project is it if any average Joe can discuss it in this forum?

 

Let me add some more "top secret" projects: Superman disabling "kryptonite", the laser gun of "Santo el Enmmascarado de Plata", the scary "Ray of Disintegration" and the most letal weapon of all, in the disguise of an unpretentious, harmless and kind-hearted alien being, who became famous thanks to the movie "ET".

 

 

psst: those are really Top Secret! Don't mention them to anyone 😉

 

Edited 5 hours ago by AndreasHG

[Inderpland]

53 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

*March peacefully,  don't forget those key words!

*Fight like hell, don't forget those key words!

[mikebike]

20 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Yes,  she was right that the govt has tried to control the weather as they have made the attempts in the past with limited success but she's taking information out of context. Spatial thinking dude. 

Attempts at weather modification are not attempts to "control the weather". She is just plain wrong, definitely not "partially right".

[nauseus]

32 minutes ago, candide said:

Stop trolling! It's written in his post, which has been fully quoted 🤣

\

Not so, you didn't mention Frank before. Hope you're not trolling.

[Inderpland]

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Well when your memory improves you might post a link to that.

A quick search gave theses links:

[Inderpland]

6 minutes ago, nauseus said:

\

Not so, you didn't mention Frank before. Hope you're not trolling.

Definitively not him who's trolling.

[candide]

23 hours ago, frank83628 said:

 probably something like this, if you listen just at the end he says 'floods and hurricanes are all subject to manipulation', that was 9 years ago too, how has technology advanced in that time.  

 

28 minutes ago, nauseus said:

\

Not so, you didn't mention Frank before. Hope you're not trolling.

Stop your ridiculous trolling! 😃

That's what he wrote:

" probably something like this, if you listen just at the end he says 'floods and hurricanes are all subject to manipulation', that was 9 years ago too, how has technology advanced in that time. "

 

BTW, the discussion you invited yourself in, was with frank.

 

So if you disagree with him about the content of the video, please address this issue directly with him! 😁

Edited 4 hours ago by candide

[Kwaibill]

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Well when your memory improves you might post a link to that.

Absolutely nothing wrong with my memory. Are you unable to use Google?

[BarraMarra]

This thread is the funniest so far now we have Yank nut jobs telling the sheep forget your arms we can drown our enemy's with a quick blast of our laser at a cloud. Some will believe this lol.

[candide]

4 hours ago, Kwaibill said:

I seem to recall DJT suggesting a nuclear blast for eliminating hurricanes. Or at least changing their course with a Sharpy.

At least Trump was efficient! Why bother with Jewish space lasers when a plain marker can do the Job! 😀

[Inderpland]

11 minutes ago, candide said:

At least Trump was efficient! Why bother with Jewish space lasers when a plain marker can do the Job! 😀

Ah yes, the magic crayon, who can forget!😁

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, candide said:

Blame Giuliani for that. The MSM did not cover anything up.

They were not given a copy of the laptop to authenticate it. After they finally got a copy, they analysed it and authenticated it

BS, which ever outlet posted it first got locked out of their twitter acc. they were only allowed back if they agreed to delete, subsequently anyone retweeting that original story was also locked/blocked, the entire story was shut down totally, then those lying '51 intelligence guys' denounced it as Russian disinformation. then everyone followed suit, it was coordinated by the dems, msm.

 

 

 

 

[nauseus]

43 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

A quick search gave theses links:

 

These don't actually link anywhere.

 

And you missed this one:

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-donald-trump-suggest-nuking-hurricanes-1535171

 

Biden accused Trump and Trump denied it. No facts or otherwise. Bye. 

 

 

[candide]

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

BS, which ever outlet posted it first got locked out of their twitter acc. they were only allowed back if they agreed to delete, subsequently anyone retweeting that original story was also locked/blocked, the entire story was shut down totally, then those lying '51 intelligence guys' denounced it as Russian disinformation. then everyone followed suit, it was coordinated by the dems, msm.

 

 

 

 

Fact is that Giuliani gave the laptop content only to the NYPost, one year after a received it. Why did he wait to release it until a few days before the election? Why only to the biased RW NYPost?

It seems Giuliani made all he could to make it look like a Russian disinformation. It looks like even Giuliani was not so confident to get the content checked by an in-depth forensic analysis! 😃

[xylophone]

21 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

These don't actually link anywhere.

 

And you missed this one:

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-donald-trump-suggest-nuking-hurricanes-1535171

 

Biden accused Trump and Trump denied it. No facts or otherwise. Bye. 

 

 

"In August 2019, the news website Axios wrote that sources who heard the president's private remarks in recorded comments in a National Security Council (NSC) memorandum claimed to have heard Trump asking top national security officials to "consider using nuclear bombs to weaken or destroy hurricanes."

 

The site wrote that during a hurricane briefing, which occurred early into the first year of Trump's presidency, Trump allegedly said, "[Hurricanes] start forming off the coast of Africa, as they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?"

 

"You could hear a gnat fart in that meeting," the source told Axios. "People were astonished. After the meeting ended, we thought, 'What the <deleted>? What do we do with this?'"

 

The report also claimed that Trump had raised the possibility of bombing hurricanes with another senior administration official, as detailed in a 2017 NSC memo.

 

Of course, trumpies will deny it, as they always do when trump says something ridiculous and/or comes out with his own medical remedies for Covid 19 (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, bleach or ultraviolet light).

 

However it's typical of a "dumb as a bag of rocks" trump remark so why not believe it!

 

[Inderpland]

25 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

These don't actually link anywhere.

 

And you missed this one:

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-donald-trump-suggest-nuking-hurricanes-1535171

 

Biden accused Trump and Trump denied it. No facts or otherwise. Bye. 

 

 

Wow, Trump the serial liar denied it. What a shocker!

[BruceWayne]

Weather modification is real so maybe MTG is correct and you're the idiots/morons/fools (delete to taste).

 

From 2007:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html

 

Creating a hurricane is PERFECTLY POSSIBLE.

 

Just sayin 👏

x

Edited 3 hours ago by BruceWayne

[thecyclist]

On 10/8/2024 at 12:51 PM, billd766 said:

She can't be that stupid as she is a US senator.

 

IMHO the really stupid ones, are the voters who elected her to represent them.

She is not a Senator. She is in the house. But there are a lot of stupid people in both chambers. 

Nevertheless, you are right, the real dummies are the voters who vote for someone like Marjorie Toilet Green. The frightening thing is that there are tens of millions of them. 

 

[BruceWayne]

37 minutes ago, thecyclist said:

She is not a Senator. She is in the house. But there are a lot of stupid people in both chambers. 

Nevertheless, you are right, the real dummies are the voters who vote for someone like Marjorie Toilet Green. The frightening thing is that there are tens of millions of them. 

 

 

MTG may be right on this topic as IT CAN BE DONE

 

From 2007:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html

 

Creating a hurricane is PERFECTLY POSSIBLE.

 

Just sayin 👏

[BruceWayne]

21 hours ago, Jingthing said:

So he's in cahoots (Jewhoots?) with Kamala Harris then. 

 

She's married to a Jew so he's LITERALLY in to her 

[Inderpland]

56 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

Weather modification is real so maybe MTG is correct and you're the idiots/morons/fools (delete to taste).

 

From 2007:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html

 

Creating a hurricane is PERFECTLY POSSIBLE.

 

Just sayin 👏

x

Ah, our resident Jewish world conspiracy expert now chipping in on MTG's latest drivel by linking to a 17 y/o article that's behind a paywall.😂

[Inderpland]

7 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

She's married to a Jew so he's LITERALLY in to her 

BTW, did Alfred get ahold of you?

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

 

These don't actually link anywhere.

 

And you missed this one:

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-donald-trump-suggest-nuking-hurricanes-1535171

 

Biden accused Trump and Trump denied it. No facts or otherwise. Bye. 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, xylophone said:

"In August 2019, the news website Axios wrote that sources who heard the president's private remarks in recorded comments in a National Security Council (NSC) memorandum claimed to have heard Trump asking top national security officials to "consider using nuclear bombs to weaken or destroy hurricanes."

 

The site wrote that during a hurricane briefing, which occurred early into the first year of Trump's presidency, Trump allegedly said, "[Hurricanes] start forming off the coast of Africa, as they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?"

 

"You could hear a gnat fart in that meeting," the source told Axios. "People were astonished. After the meeting ended, we thought, 'What the <deleted>? What do we do with this?'"

 

The report also claimed that Trump had raised the possibility of bombing hurricanes with another senior administration official, as detailed in a 2017 NSC memo.

 

Of course, trumpies will deny it, as they always do when trump says something ridiculous and/or comes out with his own medical remedies for Covid 19 (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, bleach or ultraviolet light).

 

However it's typical of a "dumb as a bag of rocks" trump remark so why not believe it!

 

ahh, those trusty 'Anonymous  sources'

 

 

 

 

[Dan O]

3 hours ago, mikebike said:

Attempts at weather modification are not attempts to "control the weather". She is just plain wrong, definitely not "partially right".

Are you that thick? Weather modification is an attempt at controlling the weather.

 

The govt does try to modify the weather so in that respect she's not far off base. Can the govt conjure up a hurricane and\or direct its path, not in this instance so for that part she is wrong which is what I stated. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Dan O

[frank83628]

4 hours ago, candide said:

Stop trolling! It's written in his post, which has been fully quoted 🤣

the guy DR Michio Kaku says agriculture, floods and hurricanes can all be subject to weather modification.  bearing in mind that was 9 years ago

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, Inderpland said:

*Fight like hell, don't forget those key words!

oh yeah, that figurative use of the word which has long been accepted in public discourse..same as bloodbath. however it's a dog whistle to you acronym sufferers!

 

'Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard' remember those KEY words?

 

 

[Rob Browder]

On 10/8/2024 at 4:02 PM, BruceWayne said:

Problem for all of you in this echo chamber is that Kamala Harris is a Marxist who was brought up by a Marxist.

Let me know when Kamala takes the "means of production" away from the Rulers - who pay for her campaigns, and the Republicans' campaigns - and hands it to the workers.  Does anyone think Larry Fink of Blackrock is worried?

 

"Cultural Marxism" is another thing, but the Republicans now support 90% of that agenda, so no help there.

[Inderpland]

13 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

 

'Peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard' remember those KEY words?

Oh yeah, the figurative use of those words which has never been accepted in public discourse. He wanted them to fight, and when they started their coup attempt by breaking into the Capitol he didn't do s***, the traitorous convict.

[Rob Browder]

On 10/8/2024 at 4:12 PM, Yagoda said:

The greatest conspiracy in the history of politics was the Russia Hoax, an election interference conspiracy perpetrated by the Democratic Leadership against the American people.

 

Just for a sense of proportion.

Yes - 100% Fake story/investigation, which was begun by Republicans to use in the R-Primary.  It's lack of substance was proven, beyond all doubt, when the closed-door Congressional testimony from Crowdstrike was released - when they admitted they had no evidence of a Russian hack of the DNC.

 

But note - Without Russiagate, the Trump voting base would have been raising hell over him trashing everything they had just voted for - vs rallying to his defense, because of the "Russiagate attack" on him. 

 

Also note - The "investigation" was running out of steam when Trump said on-camera that he fired FBI-Director Comey over Russiagate - contradicting his lawyers' legal-reason, and creating the basis to run with an "obstruction" charge.

 

The "indictments" during the R-Primary this cycle served a similar function.   Whether one believes this was a "conspiracy" or not, the result is the same - Trump's POLICIES were ignored by the Republican base, in favor of sensational stuff.