What happens in case of accident when foreigner has no PVT Insurance (only social security)

[Gecko123]

A lot of talk about the "shy" Trump voter, who won't admit that they plan to secretly vote for Trump, but what about the "shy" Republican voters who detest Trump and fully plan to vote for Harris/Walz, but don't want to broadcast it because they feel they are being disloyal to the Republican Party.

 

You think all the Bush, McCain, Nicky Haley, Liz Cheney non-Maga Republicans still registered as Republicans are going to lock-step vote for Trump? Granted it's just anecdotal evidence, but listen to some of these exit polling comments from Republicans cited in this clip.

 

 

My gut is telling me that the election is not as close as the polls are saying and Kamala Harris is going to win by a significant margin. I'm basing this on the higher Democratic enthusiasm levels when contrasted with their 2020 election enthusiasm levels. 

 

At any rate, I think most expats who are eligible to vote in the election have already cast their absentee ballots, so at this point all the foaming-at-the-mouth vitriol on this forum is probably just wasted breath.

 

For the record, I have already voted, and my ballot has been received and counted, and I have confidence that the American people know the importance of this election, and will make the right choice.

[0ffshore360]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

In sa just world, stolen valor Walz has his tallywhaeker amputated. 

Am Iforced to assume you have adopted Trump's obsession with male genitals?

[transam]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

In sa just world, stolen valor Walz has his tallywhaeker amputated. 

Stolen valour Walz is a false accusation.........

You do not have to stoop that low just because you have nothing........🥴

[CharlieH]

@G_Money you have a high number of posts removed, if you continue on that path you are likely to be removed at the next issue.

[Yellowtail]

6 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:

A lot of talk about the "shy" Trump voter, who won't admit that they plan to secretly vote for Trump, but what about the "shy" Republican voters who detest Trump and fully plan to vote for Harris/Walz, but don't want to broadcast it because they feel they are being disloyal to the Republican Party.

 

You think all the Bush, McCain, Nicky Haley, Liz Cheney non-Maga Republicans still registered as Republicans are going to lock-step vote for Trump? Granted it's just anecdotal evidence, but listen to some of these exit polling comments from Republicans cited in this clip.

 

 

My gut is telling me that the election is not as close as the polls are saying and Kamala Harris is going to win by a significant margin. I'm basing this on the higher Democratic enthusiasm levels when contrasted with their 2020 election enthusiasm levels. 

 

At any rate, I think most expats who are eligible to vote in the election have already cast their absentee ballots, so at this point all the foaming-at-the-mouth vitriol on this forum is probably just wasted breath.

 

For the record, I have already voted, and my ballot has been received and counted, and I have confidence that the American people know the importance of this election, and will make the right choice.

 

So by the right choice, did you mean open borders, mass illegal immigration, more DEI, higher taxes, more giveaways, men in girls’ showers, path to citizenship, free health care and tuition for illegals, housing subsidies for illegals, men in women’s sports and prisons, defunding the police, supporting rioters, and free transition surgery for prison inmates or Trump? 

Edited 2 hours ago by Yellowtail

[Gecko123]

20 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So by the right choice, did you mean open borders, mass illegal immigration, more DEI, higher taxes, more giveaways, men in girls’ showers, path to citizenship, free health care and tuition for illegals, housing subsidies for illegals, men in women’s sports and prisons, defunding the police, supporting rioters, and free transition surgery for prison inmates or Trump? 

 

No, I mean that they will assess the character and capabilities of both candidates, as well as their commitment to democratic ideals and institutions, the constitution, and the truth, and which candidate will work towards unifying the American people rather than dividing them along racial and socio-economic lines.

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Gecko123

[newnative]

4 hours ago, morrobay said:

Right. And the LA Times ,  NY Times and the Washington Post are not giving an  endorsement to Harris. Almost unheard of for big 3 not to endorse the democratic candidate.

    The NY Times endorsed Harris.  The Post and the LA Times wanted to endorse Harris but the rich owners vetoed the endorsements.  

[Gecko123]

19 minutes ago, newnative said:

    The NY Times endorsed Harris.  The Post and the LA Times wanted to endorse Harris but the rich owners vetoed the endorsements.  

This tepid editorial response by corporate media isn't being done out of a lack of enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. It's being done out of a fear of retribution in the event Trump reclaims the White House. Not only are they afraid of retribution directed at their media interests, but retaliation directed at their other corporate interests as well. Consider how tax, anti-trust law, legal harassment, etc. could be used to punish media and corporate interests by a rogue, unchecked commander in chief.

 

Unlike so many Trump supporters on this forum, these media barons are well-aware of how Hitler cracked down on the media after he attained the Chancellorship in 1933. The thuggery of the SA and SS which Hitler used to accomplish this is the only component which is presently missing, but imagine an environment when the now incarcerated leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are pardoned by Trump, and his no-longer-independent Justice department turns a blind eye towards political street thuggery. As I have said many times on this forum in the past, Trump supporters are going to pay dearly for their blinding ignorance of history.

Edited 1 hour ago by Gecko123

[theblether]

1 minute ago, Gecko123 said:

This tepid editorial response by corporate media isn't being done out of a lack of enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. It's being done out of a fear of retribution in the event of Trump reclaims the White House. Not only are they are afraid of retribution directed at their media interests, but their other corporate interests as well. Unlike so many Trump supporters on this forum, these media barons are well-aware of how Hitler cracked down on the media after he attained the Chancellorship in 1933. The thuggery of the SA and SS which Hitler used to accomplish this is the only component which is presently missing, but imagine an environment when the now incarcerated leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are pardoned by Trump and his no longer independent Justice department turns a blind eye towards political street thuggery. As I have said many times on this forum in the past, Trump supporters are going to pay dearly for their blinding ignorance of history.

 

Give it a rest. The Russia Hoax Brigade are now in full Hitler mode. 

 

You are an embarrassment. 

 

 

[spidermike007]

Let us hope the polls are wrong. The last thing this planet needs is another four years of Trump and his madness. Also, he is way too old to lead, and is in a state of severe cognitive decline, and increasingly incoherent.

 

Theyre eating the dogs, 

They're eating the cats, 

They're taking your pets. 

 

From a recent speech:

"What would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery’s now underwater and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there?”

By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. Do you notice that? A lot of shark — I watched some guys justifying it today. “Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were not hungry but they misunderstood who she was.” These people are crazy —

“There’s no problem with sharks. They just didn’t really understand a young woman swimming now who really got decimated and other people, too.” A lot of shark attacks.

So I said, “So there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards. Or here. Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking and water goes over the battery? The boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted, or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted?” Because I will tell you, he didn’t know the answer. He said, “You know, nobody’s ever asked me that question.”

 

[theblether]

Where are the people who were boasting about Kamala having 2.5 million views last night? 

 

Trump's interview with Joe Rogan has been viewed 9.4 million times on YouTube already, a mere 10 hours after being posted. Spotify figures haven't been released yet. 

 

Estimated views, listens combined, with clips included will be well over ONE BILLION. 

[NickyLouie]

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTFbdMPWf/

[JimTripper]

I can't see Harris winning. Her campaign has no traction.

 

Oddly, most people will vote for what they notice even if it's not a great option.

 

Where attention goes, energy flows.

 

That's what is behind a lot of Trumps antics.

 

Being ignored is worse then negative publicity.

Edited 1 hour ago by JimTripper

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Gecko123 said:

 

No, I mean that they will assess the character and capabilities of both candidates, as well as their commitment to democratic ideals and institutions, the constitution, and the truth, and which candidate will work towards unifying the American people rather than dividing them along racial and socio-economic lines.

 

Oh, so Trump. For a minute I thought you were I Harris supporter, sorry! 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, newnative said:

    The NY Times endorsed Harris.  The Post and the LA Times wanted to endorse Harris but the rich owners vetoed the endorsements.  

Did any of them quit in protest? 

 

If I believed Trump was a fascist dictator, I would quit. 

[Yellowtail]

46 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:

This tepid editorial response by corporate media isn't being done out of a lack of enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. It's being done out of a fear of retribution in the event Trump reclaims the White House. Not only are they afraid of retribution directed at their media interests, but retaliation directed at their other corporate interests as well. Consider how tax, anti-trust law, legal harassment, etc. could be used to punish media and corporate interests by a rogue, unchecked commander in chief.

 

Unlike so many Trump supporters on this forum, these media barons are well-aware of how Hitler cracked down on the media after he attained the Chancellorship in 1933. The thuggery of the SA and SS which Hitler used to accomplish this is the only component which is presently missing, but imagine an environment when the now incarcerated leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are pardoned by Trump, and his no-longer-independent Justice department turns a blind eye towards political street thuggery. As I have said many times on this forum in the past, Trump supporters are going to pay dearly for their blinding ignorance of history.

That's hilarious! 

[morrobay]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So by the right choice, did you mean open borders, mass illegal immigration, more DEI, higher taxes, more giveaways, men in girls’ showers, path to citizenship, free health care and tuition for illegals, housing subsidies for illegals, men in women’s sports and prisons, defunding the police, supporting rioters, and free transition surgery for prison inmates or Trump? 

Right the above is much more relevant to the average/ highest percentage of voters . As opposed to the lofty @Gecko123 diatribe that really is NA here. Trump landslide.

[GammaGlobulin]

Go Trump, GO!

 

i have become a TOTAL Trump supporter.

 

Thank's Harris.

 

You converted me, like nobody else could.