Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, proton said:

 

As well as 90 million Americans who will vote for Him, how anyone could vote for Harris is a mystery.

Maybe people don't want to vote for a candidate who wants the US military to be like "Hitler's generals".

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

Americans Who Never Lived in Michigan and North Carolina Can Vote

New court rulings issued on Oct. 21 say U.S. citizens who live overseas and have never resided in Michigan and North Carolina can cast ballots by mail, provided they have parents who lived in those states before leaving the country.

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act mandates states to accept ballots from Americans who live outside the country, while Republicans argue this requirement does not extend to citizens who have never lived in one of the states.

In Michigan, Republicans pointed out that the state constitution says citizens who are at least 21 years of age and who have resided in Michigan for six months shall be qualified to vote, yet Judge Sima Patel responded that in a 1972 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has found a similar residency requirement unconstitutional. Even if the Republican challenge had merit, the judge said she would still deny it because it comes too close to the November election.

 

Another tactic by Democrats to get more votes. 

 

Where do you want US citizens living abroad to vote?

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

If you're right, American democracy is doomed, but they will be breaking out the champagne in Moscow.

 

Why are you so intimidated by Russia ?

 

Hunters laptop wasn't enough proof for you ....

 

#partyBoi

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

Americans Who Never Lived in Michigan and North Carolina Can Vote

New court rulings issued on Oct. 21 say U.S. citizens who live overseas and have never resided in Michigan and North Carolina can cast ballots by mail, provided they have parents who lived in those states before leaving the country.

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act mandates states to accept ballots from Americans who live outside the country, while Republicans argue this requirement does not extend to citizens who have never lived in one of the states.

In Michigan, Republicans pointed out that the state constitution says citizens who are at least 21 years of age and who have resided in Michigan for six months shall be qualified to vote, yet Judge Sima Patel responded that in a 1972 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has found a similar residency requirement unconstitutional. Even if the Republican challenge had merit, the judge said she would still deny it because it comes too close to the November election.

 

Another tactic by Democrats to get more votes. 

 

Good and correct ruling by Judge Patel, who was following established law.  

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, theblether said:

Shock early results from Nevada, Republicans are ahead in early voting. This is highly unusual and although tight ( 39 - 37% ) it doesn't bode well for the Dems as the rural counties are flocking to the voting stations. 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/nevada-results 

 

"Republicans lead in counted ballots by about 6,000, roughly 2 percent, Ralston noted in an updated post Tuesday morning.

 

He explained Monday that the “firewall” that generally contributes to a Democratic advantage from Clark County has “collapsed,” with Democrats only leading Republicans there by about 4,500 votes. The county is the most populous in the state and home to Las Vegas."

Nevada early voting data shows potential danger for Kamala Harris and Democrats

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 10/19/2024 at 10:05 PM, GammaGlobulin said:

This is what I have been saying, too.

 

It's just that nobody ever takes what i say seriously.

 

Trump is headed for a Landslide Victory....please mark my words...this time.

 

(Also, I don't get no respect.)

 

Anybody with a little bit of literacy and numeracy could easily assume these mindless polling outcomes, so your predictive skills are still suspect. ( are you studying math? Is that why the post?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Shmo said:

Anybody with a little bit of literacy and numeracy could easily assume these mindless polling outcomes, so your predictive skills are still suspect. ( are you studying math? Is that why the post?

 

Actually, it all about Human Behavior, and far less about Math.

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...