Jump to content

Bangkok Governor Supports Congestion Charge to Curb Traffic


webfact

Recommended Posts

That might work, IF, the public trans lines weren't packed already.  Apparently these people don't use public trans, or they'd realize there's no more room for more people.

 

What they should have done was stopped building 20+ yrs ago.  

Edited by KhunLA
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a South Londoner who has lived here in Saraburi Province for 18 years I predict that Bangkok will be under water before they can implement this plan.

 

Recently I have realised that Saraburi Town is only a little higher than Bangkok over sea level. The land doesn't rise dramatically till on Highway 2 you are passing the two cement works. Flooding of Bangkok will be extensive.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChrisY1 said:

And just how do they intend to implement such a scheme in Bangkok.

Will all vehicles have a reader that checks into a monitor...as in Singapore?  Will they follow the Brits and install ULEZ cameras:))?

Then of course, will anyone pay the fines......and we all know that answer.

 

NO! This will be manual work. Now this opened the opportunity for yet another 300 000 traffic police positions. Means more rev. to the police position buying system as well. Hurray! 😉

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will never be traffic free or less traffic. It is just a money grab.. just look at Singapore - there are now so many entries into the cities, suburb, highways .. and yet there are jams bumper to bumper traffic every day at peak hour .. it started on the premise to free the city of traffic but now it’s in everywhere .. then look at London - need I say more .. it will just increase government coffers .. 

sadly .. it’s like believing that by paying carbon tax and expect no more monsoons, hurricanes n typhoons next year 🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gottfrid said:

NO! This will be manual work. Now this opened the opportunity for yet another 300 000 traffic police positions. Means more rev. to the police position buying system as well. Hurray! 😉

New corruption Scam for the money collectors.  😜

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, webfact said:

Mr. Chadchart stressed that for the plan to be truly effective, Bangkok’s public transport system must first undergo significant improvements.

If that was done in the first place maybe there wouldn't be such a traffic issue.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 20 baht flat fare is successful, and people leave their cars at home, how will the governor make cash to pay for the flat fare in the future?

 

Bangkok GDP 252.128 (2022) Billion USD Pop. 19,900,000 (2022)

London GDP 692.765 (2022) Billion USD Pop. 8,866,198 (2022)

Singapore GDP 525.228 (2024) Billion USD Pop. 5,938,000 (2024)

(all on Wikipedia)

Perhaps it will anger people who struggle to get to work. Certainly, mass transit doesn't go everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

In your dreams Bangkok.

There needs to be a robust and reliable public transport system in place first.

One that ALL people have access to. Not just the semi rich.

Thailand is broke and cannot afford to build one.

 

Obviously another AN headline reader - too much trouble to read the article otherwise you would have read that this scheme would fund a flat 20 baht fare across ALL mass transit lines.

Is it only semi rich people who can afford a 20 baht train journey?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RandolphGB said:

They will never be able to introduce the level of technology needed to enforce a congestion charge. 

 


Based on what? They have already implemented similar technology on  route 9 with M Flow which is more advanced than Singapore's ERP system as that requires an RFID reader in your car. M Flow requires nothing in your car but uses Automatic Licenses Plate Recognition coupled with AI and cross referencing with pictures of your car. Seamless and smart - works perfectly. It is supposed to be rolled out across all expressway networks at some point but not sure when.

Pretty sure this is the exact same technology that a congestion charge system would use.

So why can't Thailand introduce the technology? It already has it. Or you just fancied a bash...got it.

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KhunLA said:

That might work, IF, the public trans lines weren't packed already.  Apparently these people don't use public trans, or they'd realize there's no more room for more people.

If I'm not mistaken you live in PKK and rarely venture to Bangkok and when you do you drive, so don't think you are often on trains.

The trains can be busy at rush hours (same as in any other country in the entire world) but outside of those limited times there is plenty of room. Even at peak rush hour on the BTS I have let one train pass but the next one is immediately behind it waiting and is half empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought  Bangkok was sinking and the Local / National government was looking to relocate. Would make more sense to start with a fully integrated traffic / Public Transport system than cajole something out of today's infrastructure mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

If I'm not mistaken you live in PKK and rarely venture to Bangkok and when you do you drive, so don't think you are often on trains.

And yet ...

 

image.png.6d195bde20b7d0abaf942fc45dede508.png

 

One time leaving T21 to hop BTS to Nana station, we had a hard just getting to the other side of the road, via exit to platform to stairs.   So we could walk it.

 

You couldn't even past the turnstiles, as they were way backed up.  Guessing some of those folks had to wait for about the 5th train to come by.   What a cluster F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RayWright said:

I thought  Bangkok was sinking and the Local / National government was looking to relocate. Would make more sense to start with a fully integrated traffic / Public Transport system than cajole something out of today's infrastructure mess.

They actually have a decent integrated system, it's just obsolete, and been that way for at least 5 yrs.   For that reason, we don't go near it during rush.

 

Always make sure we stay within walking distance to food for early evening, late night time munch.  Ok to knock around the city playing tourist 0900-1500 hrs, but during rush hour, or weekends when everyone is out & about ... Hell No

 

Pool time or hang out with daughter, locally.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The train schedule needs to see a substantial increase in services if they are serious. It’s like trying to squeeze into a can of sardines during peak hour now. What’s it going to be like when you take all the cars off the roads and force them into the trains and buses. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...