Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

When you have a car wreck, the money is actually spent out on the road where the crash happened.  Not at the shop where you fixed the damage.

 

It's the same with broken borders.  That money is gone.  Harris/Biden squandered it.  The only question is, how long are we expected to support them before we send them back?

 

What happened to the Mexican money spent on a wall?

  • Confused 1
Posted
9 hours ago, TedG said:

Name a Democrat who does not lie. 

I don't need to, your man lies openly on a stage for the World to see, is that what you want as the leader of the free World, if you do, you're as daft as him........🤪

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

What happened to Biden's speech impediment?

Biden and Trump are old men and suffering from cognitive decline. Both shouldn’t be running for President. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
16 hours ago, BruceWayne said:

Can't think why they'd say that about her tbh - apart from the constant nose touching, sniffin, wonky jaw, word salads, those eyes & the constant weird inappropriate laughter - well just her overall disposition really 🙂

 

Hillary had a similar thing going on.  Quite creepy.  She ended up collapsing.  Perhaps it's just too much pressure for some.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, transam said:

Show us the proof of what you are implying...........?    :whistling:

 

But I reckon the rest of us are not the slightest bit interested in your McD's/Kamala childish fetish, plus, your hero had made himself look more stupid with his "staged" McD's stunt, it wasn't real, though it was to you...🤣

 

As usual, you have nothing................:coffee1:

Your intellect shines once again. I do not have to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on Harris and her claim that she worked at McDonald's. There is no evidence of this ever having occurred. If you have such evidence I suggest you send it to Harris' people immediately and of course post it on here.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, BangkokReady said:

 

So, just to confirm, you're very happy to claim that Trump lies, but when someone says that Harris lies, you try to deflect and discredit them, going as far as pretending it is suddenly evidence of a "childish fetish"?  🤦‍♂️

 

At least you make your bias so obvious that there isn't much work need to discredit you...  🤷‍♂️

I/we, the World knows Trump lies to impress the numpties to believe, as it seems you are ..........🤭

 

Where is @dinsdale's insinuation proof that Harris never worked at McD's, better still, you show me ...😉

 

You're talking of bias, you just did it admirably, well done.........:clap2:

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Your intellect shines once again. I do not have to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on Harris and her claim that she worked at McDonald's. There is no evidence of this ever having occurred. If you have such evidence I suggest you send it to Harris' people immediately and of course post it on here.

So guilty until proven innocent in your book, yep, Trump material.....😒

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, frank83628 said:

A 3 hour podcast would suggust different

Trump probably needed the rest, he knew he had to stand on a stage, but enjoyed the relax instead, eh.......😉

  • Sad 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Hillary had a similar thing going on.  Quite creepy.  She ended up collapsing.  Perhaps it's just too much pressure for some.

Is Hillary still enjoying rent free accommodation after all these years?

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, transam said:

I/we, the World knows Trump lies to impress the numpties to believe, as it seems you are ..........🤭

 

Where is @dinsdale's insinuation proof that Harris never worked at McD's, better still, you show me ...😉

 

You're talking of bias, you just did it admirably, well done.........:clap2:

It seems you have no idea about burden of proof. I do not have to prove a negative. Here's an example that you may or may not understand. I do not have to prove God doesn't exist. The proof of burden of God's existence is on those who say God exists. Same goes with Kamala's claim she worked at McDonalds. No one has to prove she didn't. She has to prove she did. It's a very simple concept.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

A 3 hour podcast would suggust different

It’s not usual at all.

 

Lots of old folk behave this way, sit them down in a cumfy chair, give them a cup of tea and a biscuit and they ramble on for hours.

 

 

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...