Jump to content

New Shock Iowa Poll Shows Kamala Harris Leading Trump by Three Points


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Believing any poll you want is what you have just done,. can't make this stuff up.

I do not believe any poll.. They never accurately tell you the truth. But you know NBC is a Dem supported network. So, if I had any thought about what they show. i know already they lean to Harris automatically. Another point is that several other Dem controlled news outlets are also saying the same thing. @Tug though gets his pants into a fancy if he ever sees good results with Harris. Which was my reason for posting that. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

The number of voters per candidate is not as important as the number of electors who get sent to Washington DC. Buy them and you win. 

  • Like 1
Posted

This is fishy. I don't think there is anyway Kamala takes Iowa. It's a bit like watching a football game and you go away for 30 seconds and the score changes by three touchdowns. Highly unlikely.

 

Who are they polling? Who exactly are they calling every week? FWIW I lived in Iowa before moving to WV. It was quickly becoming more red and it is the state that put Kamala to sleep last time she showed up.

 

People are saying Trump might take NY or NJ which is equally absurd. More importantly is Iowa has a 1% chance of actually changing the election anyway. But by all means dems can stay home they are winning in Iowa.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
In the NY Times today it says, just as the polls were wrong in 2016 because people were embarrassed to admit they would be voting for Mr. Trump, on-the-ground Harris folks in PA have been told not to go to any house with a Trump poster out front as to not cause a problem for someone in the house who actually and secretly intends to vote for Ms. Harris.
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The polls don't matter, and you will forget them all in 48 hours.

 

Oh, wait! Here's a poll I like.

We already know this won't be settled in 48 hours.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

This is fishy. I don't think there is anyway Kamala takes Iowa. It's a bit like watching a football game and you go away for 30 seconds and the score changes by three touchdowns. Highly unlikely.

 

Who are they polling? Who exactly are they calling every week? FWIW I lived in Iowa before moving to WV. It was quickly becoming more red and it is the state that put Kamala to sleep last time she showed up.

 

People are saying Trump might take NY or NJ which is equally absurd. More importantly is Iowa has a 1% chance of actually changing the election anyway. But by all means dems can stay home they are winning in Iowa.

The difference is that trump has a track record more and more folks are getting their heads out of the fake news Fox especially after the debate + what trump has done to women….they ain’t happy and they vote.thats not even getting into the threat to our healthcare system via looney Kennedy,the outright in your face racism the looney tariffs plans……also many farmer’s remember trump destroying their Chinese market for his trade war he lost……naa he’s toast 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tug said:

The difference is that trump has a track record more and more folks are getting their heads out of the fake news Fox especially after the debate + what trump has done to women….they ain’t happy and they vote.thats not even getting into the threat to our healthcare system via looney Kennedy,the outright in your face racism the looney tariffs plans……also many farmer’s remember trump destroying their Chinese market for his trade war he lost……naa he’s toast 

Iowa has been hit heavily by illegal aliens. It is straight up I35 from Texas. It has traditionally been wlecoming of migrant workers for the beet harvest every year. However the hospitality for those new comers that are unwelcome is running out.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

We already know this won't be settled in 48 hours.

You are probably right, if the incessant whinging about 2020 by Tru p and his supporters, both foreign and domestic, is anything to go by.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You are probably right, if the incessant whinging about 2020 by Tru p and his supporters, both foreign and domestic, is anything to go by.

Yes because the dems won't be the same if it is close. I can see both sides you are so blinded to anything but what you wish to be.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

Yes because the dems won't be the same if it is close. I can see both sides you are so blinded to anything but what you wish to be.

Projecting much?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

Yes because the dems won't be the same if it is close. I can see both sides you are so blinded to anything but what you wish to be.

You’ve given up on a Trump landslide then.

Posted
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

You’ve given up on a Trump landslide then.

I have never said that would be the case. However if the polls are off it favors Trump not Kamala. You realize I am not voting for  Trump right? 

Posted

I wish they would stop all this,  do they honestly believe people will change the way they vote because of these reports ?   There is only one poll which matters, lets just wait and see .   

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

I wish they would stop all this,  do they honestly believe people will change the way they vote because of these reports ?   There is only one poll which matters, lets just wait and see .   

They make money off of polling. People suck it up. It works. The population of Iowa has apparently changed their mind by over 10 points in several days. Makes sense to me.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

So the polls are right then?

Holy cow you people are incessant. If it is close it will go on for weeks. I think any surprise that ends it will for Trump. Nobody knows.

This poll suggesting there was that big of a shift in less than week is possible but it is also possible somebody could break Gretzky's fastest hat trick which took under 30 seconds. It isn't likely especially in a place like Iowa which is so stable.

Edited by Cryingdick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...