Thailand goes all in on The Homosexual Movement

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, bubblegum said:

No link just your usual childish behaviour.

 
It would a link to confirm your original post?

Thanks again for another validation.

[Nick Carter icp]

1 hour ago, BruceWayne said:

 

Sodomy is an act of violence (NOT love) imho.

 

 

   You should try some lubrication , or maybe your boyfriend likes it rough and raw and dry ?

   Tell him to stop being so selfish and to lub up before going in and to be more loving and not so brutal 

[Baht Simpson]

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yet another festival of homophobia on the forum. 

I was thinking the other day that these creatures would soon be back with their anti-LGBT rhetoric now the election's over.

 

Always the same names isn't it? Two a penny. 

[Baht Simpson]

3 hours ago, G_Money said:

As the resident expert please refer to the homophobia (in your mind).

 

Classic leftist homosexuals.  When someone disagrees with your opinion Raise The Homophobia Card.  
 

The catch all for everything.

Yes, not homophobia as such but queer-baiting. Nothing new and seemingly allowed on here now. 

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

I was thinking the other day that these creatures would soon be back with their anti-LGBT rhetoric now the election's over.

 

Always the same names isn't it? Two a penny. 

It's related to maga winning. Sore winners. Cruelty is the point.

[newnative]

2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

For generations Thailand has been known internationally as an easy-going country regarding sexual preferences. I doubt the new legislation will make much difference to the numbers of tourists arriving here. What has changed, however, is the profile of foreign visitors who now appear to be mainly from China and India, with less coming from Europe and the USA. It is unclear to me why the Thai government has encouraged this trend.

     Incorrect.  In reality, European and USA tourism to Thailand was not on the decline, pre-covid.  That includes every European country tracked.  Only Australia declined slightly in the period from 2015 to 2019.   Asian tourism, especially from China and India, increased much more during that period but western tourism did not decline, and is starting to recover since international travel has reopened.   Seeing more Asian and Indian  tourists everywhere perhaps left the impression that there were less western tourists but that was not actually the case, except for slightly fewer Australians.   

     The whole debate of 'quality' vs. 'quantity is totally ludicrous, anyway.  France, about the size of Thailand, attracts 60 million international visitors a year, double what Thailand will host this year.  Like Thailand, those 60 million are a mix economically.  That's the way it needs to be when you are a big country with a big tourism industry to support.  And, that's the way it absolutely needs to be with a huge number of hotel rooms to fill each day, and the majority not 5-star but a mix from budget hostels to super-expensive and everything in-between. 

    Neither France nor Thailand is tiny Monaco when it comes to tourism.  TAT can give lip service to attracting 'quality' tourists but that's all it is--talk.  A diverse economic tourist mix is always needed with a tourism industry as huge as Thailand's.  This was shown not long ago when there were several articles from Thai tourism folk complaining that Thailand was getting enough high-end tourists but not enough lower-end tourists to fill those types of hotel rooms--which was certainly a switch from what you might have expected.  Plenty of high-end but not enough low-end.  Who'd have thunk it.

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You're clearly no Einstein, but you playacting as a DUMBO as not seeing the homophobia on this topic isn't fooling anyone. 

1.  Still waiting as to what you’re seeing as homophobia.

No talking points on your part reveals exactly that.   Nothing.  No homophobia.

 

2.  As the resident expert.  The only freely admitted homosexual to my knowledge on the forum.

 

I never received a correct answer on the difference between gay and queer.  Perhaps you can answer correctly seeing how you most likely identify with one or both.

[Baht Simpson]

7 minutes ago, G_Money said:

I never received a correct answer on the difference between gay and queer.  Perhaps you can answer correctly seeing how you most likely identify with one or both.

It's easily Googled if you are in fact interested. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer

[Surasak]

7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Well not everyone won lifes lottery, like us US citizens. I won twice, I got to live in Cambodia and Thailand  in addition to being a citizen of the greatest country on Earth.

Perhaps you would care to enlighten us as to which country you consider the greatest country on earth?

[G_Money]

6 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

It's easily Googled if you are in fact interested. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer

I thought the resident expert would have a logical explanation.

 

After reading your link.  Gay/Queer same same 

 

Why not omit Q in LGBTQXYZ

[itsari]

More like Aseannow is full in than Thailand

[cdemundo]

7 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Probably with people who are publicly against it but still in the closet.

Makes me wonder about the most frequent posters in this thread.

Methinks you protest too much.

[Baht Simpson]

3 minutes ago, G_Money said:

 

After reading your link.  Gay/Queer same same 

 

Why not omit Q in LGBTQXYZ

It seems you've not read the article properly. Queer is an umbrella term. Put simply, gays (men attracted to other men) and lesbians (women who are attracted to other women) fall under this category, as do some of the other designations. Because the terms have evolved, particularly in the last 40 years they can be rather fluid. 

 

The Q in LGBTQ+ can be used to denote queer or questioning.

 

 

 

 

[G_Money]

6 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

It seems you've not read the article properly. Queer is an umbrella term. Put simply, gays (men attracted to other men) and lesbians (women who are attracted to other women) fall under this category, as do some of the other designations. Because the terms have evolved, particularly in the last 40 years they can be rather fluid. 

 

The Q in LGBTQ+ can be used to denote queer or questioning.

 

 

 

 

Same same.

 

Just like when I was growing up.  A Queer was a gay person.

No need to make it complicated.

 

Edited 4 hours ago by G_Money

[Baht Simpson]

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

Same same 

*sigh*

It's hard work sometimes. 

[proton]

"LGBTQQIP2SAA" just making fools of themselves 

[NoDisplayName]

10 hours ago, Yagoda said:

And what pray tell is  "LGBTQQIP2SAA"?

 

I hear the alternative lifestyle republicans will be using

LGBTQQIP2S38SPMAGA as their pronoun.

[G_Money]

10 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Google says ........... two spirit is supposedly something to do with indigenous people.

L - Lesbian
G - Gay
B - Bisexual
T - Transgender
Q - Queer
Q - Questioning
I - Intersex
P - Pansexual
2S - Two-Spirit
A - Asexual
A - Allies

 

FFS, don’t tell me 2S or two spirits are the “I identify as a cat, wolf, bird, bear or whatever people.

 

And they wonder why I call leftists lunatics.

[G_Money]

30 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

I hear the alternative lifestyle republicans will be using

LGBTQQIP2S38SPMAGA as their pronoun.

Swingers?

 

When will F be included in the alphabet soup.

 

Growing up and still currently used by some is faggot or fag for short.

 

 

[NoDisplayName]

2 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Swingers?

 

When will F be included in the alphabet soup.

 

Growing up and still currently used by some is faggot or fag for short.

 

Smokers?

 

No, they would be excluded in furtherance of inclusion.

[G_Money]

1 minute ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Smokers?

 

No, they would be excluded in furtherance of inclusion.

Brit obviously.

 

In America fag is a homosexual.

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

1.  Still waiting as to what you’re seeing as homophobia.

No talking points on your part reveals exactly that.   Nothing.  No homophobia.

 

2.  As the resident expert.  The only freely admitted homosexual to my knowledge on the forum.

 

I never received a correct answer on the difference between gay and queer.  Perhaps you can answer correctly seeing how you most likely identify with one or both.

You funny!

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1079175266870095?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

[JimTripper]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

 It would a link to confirm your original post?

Thanks again for another validation.

A man does not require validation.

[bubblegum]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

 
It would a link to confirm your original post?

Thanks again for another validation.

Is this even English?

[georgegeorgia]

9 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Probably with people who are publicly against it but still in the closet.

Oh we don't need to be judgemental Fritz please ! 

[Baht Simpson]

2 hours ago, proton said:

"LGBTQQIP2SAA" just making fools of themselves 

Well, you'll be in good company then won't you. 

[proton]

1 hour ago, Baht Simpson said:

Well, you'll be in good company then won't you. 

 

Originality in comments is not your thing then 

 

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You funny!

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1079175266870095?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

You lost.  No homophobia posted.  It’s all in your mind.  Just like all those other voices.

[G_Money]

2 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Is this even English?

It is.  Bubblegum in your brain effects you in more ways you can imagine 

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, JimTripper said:

A man does not require validation.

Who said anything about a man?