Jump to content

Biden lifts restrictions on Ukraine using US weapons to strike deep inside Russia.


Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I think you had a spelling error in your post and that what you meant was that "Trump handles his truss stress well along with his diaper!

Don't give up your day job.

Posted
2 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Such a simplistic world point of view you hold. If only it were so all the global wars could be solved overnight. Oh wait a minute, didn't the President elect promise that?

Exactly. As soon as Trump was elected, Putin halted his war destruction!

Oh wait! 😀

Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

Exactly. As soon as Trump was elected, Putin halted his war destruction!

Oh wait! 😀

Trump is Putin's puppet! 

Posted
4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

The USA us sacrificing Ukraine, blackrock etc is taking their land, zelensky the coke head is getting rich from it. I expect from fear of his life too. 

What a shame this Blackrock!

Oh wait, it's not Putin taking Ukraine's land? 😀

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, candide said:

What a shame this Blackrock!

Oh wait, it's not Putin taking Ukraine's land? 😀

Google it. Zelensky opened up agricultural land for sale to overseas investment.

I'm sure some land deals will be made due to the billions in aid given.

 

You know about the 12 trillion in minerals Ukraine sits on right? Lindsay Greyham said hey want it, and he doesn't want Putin to get his hands on it. But the Yanks are all about human rigjts not resources  

Edited by frank83628
Posted

It seems that old sleepy Joe wants to go out with a bang. Nothing to lose for him now. His effigy will be as an old senile man put out to pasture.

38313286fb66d2f7246d1131f8f727af.webp

Posted
7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Google it. Zelensky opened up agricultural land for sale to overseas investment.

I'm sure some land deals will be made due to the billions in aid given.

 

You know about the 12 trillion in minerals Ukraine sits on right? Lindsay Greyham said hey want it, and he doesn't want Putin to get his hands on it. But the Yanks are all about human rigjts not resources  

So are you claiming that it is more of a problem than Putin seizing Ukraine's land?

Posted
6 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

Once you sell a weapon it's no longer a US weapon. It belongs to the buyer. There are no restrictions on it's use attached by the seller.

 

 

Well that's not quite the case. For starters the US is giving weapons to Ukraine. The freedom to use some of the weapon systems comes with caveats. Use a particular weapon system within the restrictions we impose or you'll get no more. There would also be US weapon system specialists on the ground that can be instantly withdrawn.

Posted
5 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Well that's not quite the case. For starters the US is giving weapons to Ukraine. The freedom to use some of the weapon systems comes with caveats. Use a particular weapon system within the restrictions we impose or you'll get no more. There would also be US weapon system specialists on the ground that can be instantly withdrawn.

That's political pressure. The actual use of the weapons has no limitations.

Posted
Just now, JimTripper said:

That's political pressure. The actual use of the weapons has no limitations.

Only if you ignore the repercussions. 

 

Also, some of the high-tech stuff (I think) needs guidance assistance from the US. 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

That's political pressure. The actual use of the weapons has no limitations.

But you said

34 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

Once you sell a weapon it's no longer a US weapon. It belongs to the buyer. There are no restrictions on it's use attached by the seller.

 

 

I pointed out there are restrictions although in the case of Ukraine it's from the donor not the seller as the weapons are donated. ATACMS are a clear example of this. 

Edited by dinsdale
Posted
3 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Never, if he has a working brain!

The only problem is whether he has a working brain or not.

PS; I suspect some of his VERY senior underlings would block the launch of such an action if they wanted to live!


I agree but I’m not the one who needs the explanation.  

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, candide said:

So are you claiming that it is more of a problem than Putin seizing Ukraine's land?

You can listen here at the beginning. He says it directly. There are mineral deposits in the East, however where the main weatlth is I don't know. But it does put another perspective on the war for both sides. Lets not forget the Syrian war was about pipelines, Libya was about stopping Gadaffis gold dinar.

Not unlike the Yanks to wage wars for resources under the guise off democracy or human rights

 

Edited by frank83628
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...