Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, Upnotover said:

Is you qualify for a DTV why not just apply for it there, or maybe go to Vietnam and do it there.

I was thinking of that, I'm assuming a tourist visa is granted after 5-10 days and let's me get back in faster. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

I was thinking of that, I'm assuming a tourist visa is granted after 5-10 days and let's me get back in faster. 

I don't think there is much difference, certainly the reports on here suggest a DTV is issued within a few days, HCMC states 5 for any e-visa, if your paperwork is adequate no reason for a DTV to take a long time.

Posted
50 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

What is my best option here, apply for a tourist visa, go back in and then apply for the DTV? Can an EU national apply for a tourist visa in Malaysia?

You can obtain a tourist visa in Malaysia.

If you went back to Germany you could obtain a METV for Thailand.

The DTV is all the rage and seems attractive. 

It does have requirements.

 

Can't recall reading of denied entry at CNX. Your history is extensive.

Clearly you are not 50+ yr. 

 

Was chatting with a young UK guy and he obtained DTV eVisa in UK in few days. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

But after arrival in Chiang Mai a young lady from immigration called her boss over. As I'd stayed in Thailand 1 year and 7 months they said I'm not a tourist so he's refusing the visa waiver.

 

Wasn't Chiang Mai airport supposed to be an "easier" entry point than Bangkok, or Phuket, at least in the past? Are they copying the Bangkok airports now?

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

You can obtain a tourist visa in Malaysia.

If you went back to Germany you could obtain a METV for Thailand.

The DTV is all the rage and seems attractive. 

It does have requirements.

 

Can't recall reading of denied entry at CNX. Your history is extensive.

Clearly you are not 50+ yr. 

 

Was chatting with a young UK guy and he obtained DTV eVisa in UK in few days. 

Thanks Dr Jack. If I get the tourist visa I guess CNX is unlikely to refuse entry on the grounds I'm not. Tourist as I styed there 19 months, I guess? 

 

I'm 53 btw. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

 

Wasn't Chiang Mai airport supposed to be an "easier" entry point than Bangkok, or Phuket, at least in the past? Are they copying the Bangkok airports now?

That's what I thought, but they were like jackal circling me in a pack. All with only one goal in mind, refuse entry. One guy even screamed at me in an agitated way. 

 

Escorted in a cell like a criminal flanked by armed security. Quite surreal. I was held from 9 am to 14.30 and not given food or water. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, StayinThailand2much said:

 

Wasn't Chiang Mai airport supposed to be an "easier" entry point than Bangkok, or Phuket, at least in the past? Are they copying the Bangkok airports now?

Yeah it's not great news but if he has been in the country more or less continously since March 2023 it's not that worrying either. It just shows there's a limit even at CNX.

 

OP, I think another TV would just be a temporary reprieve, so if you're wanting to stay more than another 90 days you're much better off with a DTV.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Badger18 said:

OP, I think another TV would just be a temporary reprieve, so if you're wanting to stay more than another 90 days you're much better off with a DTV.

Temporary indeed.

If DVD difficult for the OP then a non O with ongoing extensions is an option.

If insufficient funds then use an agent. 

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

Temporary indeed.

If DVD difficult for the OP then a non O with ongoing extensions is an option.

If insufficient funds then use an agent. 

Thanks a lot! 

Posted
4 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

I'm 53 btw. 

So easy option is to get a non-imm O (Retirement) e-visa unless you don't have equivalent of 800k baht in a bank somewhere. 

 

I don't see the difference between a 60 day visa exempt and a 60 day tourist visa if the reason you were denied is you live there rather than being a genuine tourist? Surely they could say the same next time as you still live there?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

They seem to be much more harsh towards people who qualify for the retirement visa but still try to stay long term as a tourist. I have seen this type of thread a few times already. Not saying OP did anything wrong, but this area seems to be very sensitive for the IOs.

  • Agree 1
Posted

On Friday the OP posted "so I ditched her as I had to go  to work and was late. " . If he is working in Malaysia, I want his job, seeing as he spends 99% of his time in Thailand.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The Op got a taste of what it's like to deal with these people and is looking for an answer to that problem. Unfortunately, they probably won't find one even with "another correct visa". What he has will never be good enough unless he keeps depositing money.

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 hour ago, chuang said:

You really are a TOURIST ..😁

Yes I am sure even the most tolerant immigration officer has a limit and people attempting to 'bend' the rules to breaking point are asking for trouble! Which in this case he got!

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

Yes I am sure even the most tolerant immigration officer has a limit and people attempting to 'bend' the rules to breaking point are asking for trouble! Which in this case he got!

Where "tolerant" means happy to be paid-off via agents to "skip" the actual documented rules for many different extensions - edu, retirement, etc. 


In the case of serial visa-exempt entries, there is no "bending" of the law to come repeatedly.  But, laws don't matter given no system for accountability, so they use false-reason rejection-stamps to force repeat-customers to pay them through services like this:
https://aseannow.com/topic/1336926-setv-metv-still-around-now-that-visa-exempts-are-now-60-days/?do=findComment&comment=19217493

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Rob Browder said:

Where "tolerant" means happy to be paid-off via agents to "skip" the actual documented rules for many different extensions - edu, retirement, etc. 

As per usual taking a post out of context and revert to Mel Gibson conspiracy theory.

The OP has good alternative that being non O retirement+ extensions.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...