Mike Johnson Moves to bar transgender women from using women’s bathrooms at the Capitol

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

I think Mikey just wants trans women in the men's rooms. 

[jimmybcool]

2 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

There is not a greater risk of a transvestite raping a girl in a toilet than anyone else raping a girl in a toilet. Get a grip on reality.

 

Bwahahahaha.  I need to get a grip?  Rape exists despite your lack of concern.

 

BTW rape isn't the only issue.  The FEAR of assault while one is exposed with ones pants down in a public restroom is one of the reasons men are not allowed in them.  A young girl in her early teens should feel comfortable using a public restroom which means no men in there.  If a trans person actually LOOKS female and stays in her lane who cares?  If it's a hulking brute with 5 o'clock shadow wearing a dress follows a 10 year old girl into a restroom that's wrong and sorry you can't see it. 

 

I find the left's obsession with forcing integration of transvestites weird.  I'm fine if a man wants to dress as and try to present as a woman.  No skin off my nose.  Having lived 10 years in Pattaya I recognize them from afar even here in the states.  They are everywhere.  Most are harmless. 

 

The lines are simple.  In areas where women disrobe like locker rooms and shared showers no one with a dick is allowed.  And in sports defined as for women only no one who ever had a dick is allowed.  Are these limits objectionable to you?

[jimmybcool]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

They enjoy scapegoating trans people too much. They can't quit. The maga / Project 2025 fascist movement is in the process of legislating against the very existence of trans people. With maga cruelty is the point. 

 

You are so entertaining.  If endorsing trans rights was a Trump position you'd be on the other side with a hard on.  So predictable.

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

 

You are so entertaining.  If endorsing trans rights was a Trump position you'd be on the other side with a hard on.  So predictable.

That's absurd.

[G_Money]

10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

That's absurd.

 
I agree with you.  Queers won’t touch a trans with a 10 foot pole.

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

They enjoy scapegoating trans people too much. They can't quit. The maga / Project 2025 fascist movement is in the process of legislating against the very existence of trans people. With maga cruelty is the point. 

Ah yes, project 2025.  The modern day boogeyman.

 

Just because a dude grows his hair long and dons.women’s underwear doesn’t give him the right to use women’s restrooms.

 

 

[Luuk Chaai]

13 hours ago, JeffersLos said:

 

No such thing. 

 

Mentally ill males in a dress. 

 

 

If this upsets you, too bad. 🙂 

 

Bravo ! ...

my Grandmother could have "fixed that for them"    a good schmack in the head !

[pattayasan]

4 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

Bwahahahaha.  I need to get a grip?  Rape exists despite your lack of concern.

 

BTW rape isn't the only issue.  The FEAR of assault while one is exposed with ones pants down in a public restroom is one of the reasons men are not allowed in them.  A young girl in her early teens should feel comfortable using a public restroom which means no men in there.  If a trans person actually LOOKS female and stays in her lane who cares?  If it's a hulking brute with 5 o'clock shadow wearing a dress follows a 10 year old girl into a restroom that's wrong and sorry you can't see it. 

 

I find the left's obsession with forcing integration of transvestites weird.  I'm fine if a man wants to dress as and try to present as a woman.  No skin off my nose.  Having lived 10 years in Pattaya I recognize them from afar even here in the states.  They are everywhere.  Most are harmless. 

 

The lines are simple.  In areas where women disrobe like locker rooms and shared showers no one with a dick is allowed.  And in sports defined as for women only no one who ever had a dick is allowed.  Are these limits objectionable to you?

 

Yes, rape exists but transexuals don't increase the risk. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Too much hate?

 

Anyone who follows a girl into a restroom is committing a crime.

[thaibeachlovers]

15 hours ago, AlexRich said:

Matt Gaetz put Mike Johnson up to it. Apparently all those Trannies in the ladies restroom were cramping his style.

Pathetic.

[thaibeachlovers]

7 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

I think Mikey just wants trans women in the men's rooms. 

If they look like the one in the photo top of the OP, they will be completely safe from being molested or otherwise. I'd say they will be given a very large space to themselves.

[Purdey]

I am sure she will pee with the men. And they will be horrified.

[Purdey]

A man in a dress? Kind of stupid thing to say without any facts. She doesn't have a penis.

 

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/11/20/2287643/-Trans-Panic-in-the-House-No-Nancy-she-doesn-t-have-a-penis

[Presnock]

14 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

Any person that does not understand that gender is not binary needs to go back to elementary school.

suggest you go back to school and study about births of male and females.  Nature takes care of that.  But with drugs and lifestyles, who knows what effect that might have plus parents DNA.  But in life there are two sexes, not equal in physical development/strength with male normally being stronger and there fore in sports transgender males should not participate in women's sports.  Additionally IMHO personal rights to privacy for certain functions should not be shared with someone born of the opposite sex.    As I said this is my opinion - you have one too.

[Presnock]

14 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

Another feminist who only believes in equality when it suit them. 
 

You guys claimed and wanted equality, now suck it up.

 

96% of sports fans watch male sports. It generates 93% of sports advertising revenue.

Letting the women play with the trans not only lifts the standards, but increases public interest, ratings and advertising revenue.

A good example was the recent Olympics boxing. 

Yeah, the latest I read is that guy was a MALE!!!! upon birth...and as I have mentioned, IMHO they do not belong in sports wtih females nor in a female dressing room or bathroom....MY Opinion and nothing you or anyone else can say will convince me to change that!

[pattayasan]

23 minutes ago, Presnock said:

suggest you go back to school and study about births of male and females.  Nature takes care of that.  But with drugs and lifestyles, who knows what effect that might have plus parents DNA.  But in life there are two sexes, not equal in physical development/strength with male normally being stronger and there fore in sports transgender males should not participate in women's sports.  Additionally IMHO personal rights to privacy for certain functions should not be shared with someone born of the opposite sex.    As I said this is my opinion - you have one too.

 

My opinion aligns with medical science. Yours?

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If they look like the one in the photo top of the OP, they will be completely safe from being molested or otherwise. I'd say they will be given a very large space to themselves.

 

Yeah, she isn't much to look at, but I guess that's the way Mikey and the MAGAs like them.

 

[Presnock]

6 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

My opinion aligns with medical science. Yours?

suggest you go back to school...biology says that as a fetus grows, sex organs are determined in the womb based on genetics and environment.  Sometime later after birth, changes in mental due to hormonal or other causes I guess can cause some changes.  But, they are either born with male or female genetalia unless a problem occurs prior to birth but that is not "normal".

[xylophone]

From what I can see here and elsewhere, there is this terminology which is used in cases like this whereby the person in question is said to "identify as a male/female", but what the hell does that mean?

 

"Identify as" could mean so many things and for so many reasons, and god help the day when someone's offspring says to their parents that they "identify as a dog" and want to be treated as such!

 

So much nonsense

[youreavinalaff]

15 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

Bwahahahaha.  I need to get a grip?  Rape exists despite your lack of concern.

 

BTW rape isn't the only issue.  The FEAR of assault while one is exposed with ones pants down in a public restroom is one of the reasons men are not allowed in them.  A young girl in her early teens should feel comfortable using a public restroom which means no men in there.  If a trans person actually LOOKS female and stays in her lane who cares?  If it's a hulking brute with 5 o'clock shadow wearing a dress follows a 10 year old girl into a restroom that's wrong and sorry you can't see it. 

 

I find the left's obsession with forcing integration of transvestites weird.  I'm fine if a man wants to dress as and try to present as a woman.  No skin off my nose.  Having lived 10 years in Pattaya I recognize them from afar even here in the states.  They are everywhere.  Most are harmless. 

 

The lines are simple.  In areas where women disrobe like locker rooms and shared showers no one with a dick is allowed.  And in sports defined as for women only no one who ever had a dick is allowed.  Are these limits objectionable to you?

This thread is not about transvestites.

[youreavinalaff]

15 hours ago, G_Money said:

Ah yes, project 2025.  The modern day boogeyman.

 

Just because a dude grows his hair long and dons.women’s underwear doesn’t give him the right to use women’s restrooms.

 

 

Correct. However, that is not the subject of the thread.

[G_Money]

22 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Correct. However, that is not the subject of the thread.

It is.  Read the subject line 

[youreavinalaff]

17 minutes ago, G_Money said:

It is.  Read the subject line 

No. The subject is transgender. The post I quoted is referring to transvestite.

 

The two are very, very different.

[G_Money]

21 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

No. The subject is transgender. The post I quoted is referring to transvestite.

 

The two are very, very different.

Sane Same 

[HighPriority]

30 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Sane Same 

I can’t counter a well constructed argument like that magaman, you’ve got me beat… 🙄

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

No. The subject is transgender. The post I quoted is referring to transvestite.

 

The two are very, very different.

“The two are very, very different “

 

Really.  In your own words. In what way?

 

 

[BritManToo]

2 minutes ago, G_Money said:

“The two are very, very different “

 

Really.  In your own words. In what way?

One has a penis and testicles (trasvestite)

One doesn't have a penis or testicles (transgender)

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

No. The subject is transgender. The post I quoted is referring to transvestite.

 

The two are very, very different.

“The two are very, very different “

 

Really.  In your own words. In what way?

 

 

[HighPriority]

I think someone has lost their shallow grip on reality but for the maga type it’s just the same ol slippery slope down the rabbit hole. 

[G_Money]

9 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

One has a penis and testicles (trasvestite)

One doesn't have a penis or testicles (transgender)

Not always true.  Post op and Pre op.

 

Pre op still has the junk the front trunk.

 

 

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, HighPriority said:

I think someone has lost their shallow grip on reality but for the maga type it’s just the same ol slippery slope down the rabbit hole. 

I can see your point.  Appears @youreavinalaff thinks transgender and transvestite are different.