Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Some posters drive BYD that identifies as a car.

I'm offended, as a CisBEV operator :coffee1:

 

How dare you limit me to a manufacturer ... MG owner, I think not, I'm special ...

... BEV

... ICE

... Hybrid

... HEV

... PHEV

 

Don't forget the 'sub-category' ...

... "CwS" / Charged w/ Solar

 

The more letters the better ... "MGZSCisBEV+CwS"

And my new pronoun ... 'BeepBeep'

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, NoshowJones said:

I have never heard of the term Cisgender before, what exactly is the Cis?

 

Ive already gone to google once.

If your require more information I suggest you hit up the search engine of your choice for the answer.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have never heard about Cisgender and have no idea what it means. However, trannies are just mentally sick people. A man pretending to be a woman has problems.

  • Sad 1
Posted

whoever writes these engagement posts
tip: it is very obvious by your writing style, you do not even need to read the post to know its another fairy tale

but as for the fairy tale....
Neither Exist.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 12:01 PM, malathione said:

No such thing as a transgender woman so your query is moot. Your choice is stark; go out with a woman or go out with a man.

A bit of misconception there.

The prefix "trans" means to cross, and transgender women are those that have crossed the gender divide with gender reassignment surgery. Man & Woman are terms for gender, as opposed to male and female which relate to the sex of the individual and cannot be changed.

Those that dress up or take hormones are something else, ladyboys, chicks with dxks, transvestites, cross dressers,  call them what you want.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

Or they may think neither!

Up to them, they can think what they like, doesn't mean the rest of the population have to play along

  • Love It 1
Posted
15 hours ago, sandyf said:

A bit of misconception there.

The prefix "trans" means to cross, and transgender women are those that have crossed the gender divide with gender reassignment surgery. Man & Woman are terms for gender, as opposed to male and female which relate to the sex of the individual and cannot be changed.

Those that dress up or take hormones are something else, ladyboys, chicks with dxks, transvestites, cross dressers,  call them what you want.

 

While I respect your point of view, I don't pander to social constructs, only biological; either the person is XX or XY, other than a vanishingly small population of people to whom that does not strictly apply.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 10:58 PM, RSD1 said:

Three a year doesn't make you queer...

-bob smith-

Did he really say that?  I don't know what to think about that guy? 

Posted
On 12/3/2024 at 12:25 PM, 123Stodg said:

When forming romantic relationships in Thailand, you could consider the option to choose from either cisgender or transgender women. But which makes a better partner? This isn’t about “which is better” in a general sense, or a question of homosexuality, but more a question of suitability for a meaningful, long-term relationship.

 

It’s well known that many Thai cisgender women looking for foreign husbands come from troubled family backgrounds. Often a background of broken homes, financial struggles, abuse, and limited education can lead to immaturity or a lack of emotional stability needed for a serious relationship with a foreigner. Does this mean that transgender women could be a better option?

 

There’s an argument that transgender women, particularly in Thailand, could demonstrate greater resilience and determination in life. Many have faced adversity, from societal stigmas to familial rejection, and have had to find their own way in life. This could perhaps result in them being more mature, independent, and possibly even better educated than some of their cisgender counterparts. Would this then make them more understanding, empathetic, and/or suitable as a partner?

 

In terms of what makes for a fulfilling partner, there are also other factors to consider. Some foreign men may feel that transgender women can be more emotionally supportive and attentive in relationships, perhaps due to their own life experiences. Some transgender women might approach relationships with a more unique sense of generosity, care, and loyalty from having worked to overcome societal barriers in their own lives. This all may make them more appreciative of a supportive partner and more dedicated to creating a harmonious relationship.

 

Cisgender women, though, may be more traditional in their attitude towards relationships, which could appeal more to men who prefer conventional gender roles and want to avoid any stigmas. Cisgender women would also place more emphasis on creating a family, which would be more fulfilling for men who seek raising children. However, for some men, this traditional Thai mindset also usually comes with expectations of financial support and encompasses a lack of emotional depth.

 

Sexual fulfillment is another aspect where perspectives could vary. Some men find transgender women more open-minded when exploring intimacy, while others feel cisgender women offer a more natural heterosexual dynamic. Ultimately, it will come down to personal preferences and expectations in this area.

 

Another factor to consider is family dynamics. Cisgender Thai women are often under pressure to support their families financially, which can complicate relationships with foreign male partners. Transgender women may involve less of this expectation, depending upon individual family circumstances, but their familial relationships could also be strained, adding an alternative layer of added complexity.

 

What do you think? Could transgender women be more mature, generous, and emotionally supportive in a relationship, or is the background of an individual always more important than their gender identity? Is either group more suitable as a partner, or is it impossible to generalize? Also, would choosing a transgender woman as a partner only possibly be suitable for a man who is seemingly bisexual?

This ought to trigger a few members (pun intended).

Posted
8 hours ago, malathione said:

While I respect your point of view, I don't pander to social constructs, only biological; either the person is XX or XY, other than a vanishingly small population of people to whom that does not strictly apply.

X and Y are sex chromosomes,  females are defined by X and X, males are defined by X and Y.

Man and Woman are terms for gender and not defined by chromosomes. Gender is normally defined by genitalia at birth but it can be reassigned.

Of course you are perfectly free to disagree with the medical profession.

 

Sweden became the first country in the world to allow transgender people to change their legal gender after "reassignment surgery" and provide free hormone treatment, in 1972.[1] Singapore followed soon after in 1973, being the first in Asia.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-affirming_surgery

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, sandyf said:

X and Y are sex chromosomes,  females are defined by X and X, males are defined by X and Y.

Man and Woman are terms for gender and not defined by chromosomes. Gender is normally defined by genitalia at birth but it can be reassigned.

Of course you are perfectly free to disagree with the medical profession.

 

Sweden became the first country in the world to allow transgender people to change their legal gender after "reassignment surgery" and provide free hormone treatment, in 1972.[1] Singapore followed soon after in 1973, being the first in Asia.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-affirming_surgery

I am perfectly aware of chromosome pairs. The redefinition of gender is a social construct so, yes, as a scientist, I will disagree with the medical profession. 

You have your beliefs and definitions and I have mine. The twain shall never meet.

As I said, I respect and will continue to respect yours and other's divergent opinions. I have no issues with that.

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, malathione said:

I am perfectly aware of chromosome pairs. The redefinition of gender is a social construct so, yes, as a scientist, I will disagree with the medical profession. 

You have your beliefs and definitions and I have mine. The twain shall never meet.

As I said, I respect and will continue to respect yours and other's divergent opinions. I have no issues with that.

 

"The redefinition of gender is a social construct" -   wrong, a change of legal entity.

As a scientist you should be ware that you cannot make up your own unsubstantiated definitions.

Neither have I stated any opinion for you to respect, only facts.

What you rally mean is your bigotry will prevail.

Posted
Just now, sandyf said:

"The redefinition of gender is a social construct" -   wrong, a change of legal entity.

As a scientist you should be ware that you cannot make up your own unsubstantiated definitions.

Neither have I stated any opinion for you to respect, only facts.

What you rally mean is your bigotry will prevail.

Do you claim that legality is not a social construct? The very language you use is a social construct!

The only bigot here seems to be you, which, of course, is symptomatic of the fascist liberals. And that is something I have no respect for.

Carry on talking to yourself, if you so wish.

Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 8:41 AM, JonnyF said:

There is no such thing as Cisgender women.

 

There are women (real women). And Trans women (men who dress/act as women). 

There are women .......

and then there are Trans women (men who dress/act as women). 

or to put it politically correct  ...  you can put lipstick on a pig ..  it's still a pig

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 12/5/2024 at 12:40 PM, bbi1 said:

. A man pretending to be a woman has problems.

 

..... especially ..  if he's in prison  .   and his best buddy is named Bubba !

Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 5:08 AM, SS1 said:

Please keep that woke terminology in your home country. 

 

The correct terms are "Women" and "Ladyboys".. or if more specification needed, "real women" and "ladyboys".

 

Both are great and to be treated with respect. 

So where does the Kathoey fit into this discussion 🤠

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...