Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Presnock said:

BUT, the COVID vacinations are an entirely different brand of medicine, from what I have read that actually can alter one's DNA and thus the big problem - especially in the autoimmunity parts of a person's body. 

Another conspiracy theory disproven, apart from by those who want to believe nonsense......

 

Can the COVID-19 vaccine alter my DNA?

No. COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way. Both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines deliver instructions (genetic material) to our cells to start building protection against the virus that causes COVID-19. However, the material never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.

https://www.orangecountync.gov/Faq.aspx?QID=751

 

 COVID-19 vaccines do not alter DNA.

https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html

 

Claims that mRNA vaccines change human DNA are back

By iHeard STL • February 1, 2024

 

Despite being unsupported by research, claims about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines interfering with human DNA continue to circulate. This week, one in six adults (17%) surveyed in four states said they’d heard the claim in the last 7 days; 72% of those believed it could be true. 

Persistence of this claim may be due to concerns recently expressed by Florida’s Surgeon General that mRNA vaccines can carry foreign DNA into a cell. However, mRNA only enters the cell cytoplasm and does not enter the cell’s nucleus where human DNA is found. Messenger RNA (mRNA) in COVID-19 vaccines teaches cells to make a spike protein from the virus, helping the body fight the actual virus. Once the mRNA gives instructions to the cells, the body breaks it down so it cannot harm the body. 

https://hcrl.wustl.edu/claims-that-mrna-vaccines-change-human-dna-are-back/

 

Follow the science.......

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

In order to break one's chains, the first thing one needs to do is understand that "established" sources of information are merely propaganda outlets.

 

If you can even make it to page 4 , where the raw talent of modern day society rears it ugly rear ..............  i am sure you can understand why I almost never engage with these humanoids .  ( i could have used a similar sounding word ,  but doubt my humor would have been appreciated)  .

 

one would need kryptonite to break the chains ....... and now its unaffordable  

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 12/17/2024 at 8:28 AM, Red Phoenix said:

With this post I will almost surely p1ss off both sides of the US political fence, i.e. both the Trump admirers and his haters. 

Not political fences, common sense. Anyone with any can read into the nonsense from the get go. A few clues for you about the post you made:

 

The term "independent sources" can be misleading, as it implies that these sources are free from bias or conflicts of interest. However, many so-called independent sources are not subject to the same rigorous peer-review process or scientific scrutiny as mainstream sources.

 

The claim that excess deaths have increased in heavily-vaccinated countries is not supported by evidence. In fact, studies have shown that countries with high vaccination rates have generally experienced lower mortality rates than countries with low vaccination rates.

 

The term "turbo-cancer" is not a recognized medical term, and there is no evidence to suggest that mRNA vaccines are causing an increase in cancer or cardiovascular disease.

 

Overall, the comments you made appear to be promoting conspiracy theories and misinformation about vaccines, and should be viewed with skepticism.  Why not read up on the science rather than resort to nonsense conspiracy? You know it makes sense.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

LOL..... you just make up whatever suits your ill conceived world view?  Not since May 12, 2023.... not surprisingly you're way behind the curve.

Actual experience on the ground by a Thai married to a US lady, does contradict your statement.  The US Embassy in Bangkok probably 'didn't receive the message'.

Posted
24 minutes ago, rumak said:

Let's see how Kennedy and his clan proceed with the narrative regarding the Pharma cartel .    Will be interesting.... to say the least .

I wouldn't believe anything that this Kennedy nut job decides to put out there – – why should one listen to an ex-drug addict who believes that a worm ate his brain and who is a conspiracy theorist par excellence.

Get real, people.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

if my writings can sow a bit of doubt in the minds of those that are parroting the lies

 

you always did ( speaking in recent times)  have more empathy for the very large group we call "humanity" .

me, i am much more on the G Carlin amusement team .   not really caring anymore for the impossible state most are in .    just watching the sheet show .

the other great saying was something about doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.   If nothing else.... these topics definitely attest to that.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/17/2024 at 10:10 AM, impulse said:

 

It'll be years before we know.  That's why they call them "long term side effects".  But if you believe some of the early studies coming out that indicate one death per 800 shots, and extrapolate that over the billions of shots, it may be millions. 

 

I'm looking forward to RFK Jr, Musk and his AI skills, and DOGE to look at all the data, with no holds barred.

 

Don't be bloody daft! 1:800 is completely ridiculous. 1:8.000.000 is much closer to the mark and they are NOT deaths but reactions to the vaccine. The death rate is infinitesimal.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, rumak said:

 

If you can even make it to page 4 , where the raw talent of modern day society rears it ugly rear ..............  i am sure you can understand why I almost never engage with these humanoids .  ( i could have used a similar sounding word ,  but doubt my humor would have been appreciated)  .

 

one would need kryptonite to break the chains ....... and now its unaffordable  

 

I agree, it's not worth the time and effort.

Posted
8 hours ago, rct99q said:

Sounds like this English guy was poor, made poor decisions in life. Nobody forced them to get the jab. I guess living the life in Thailand was a better decision than life planning. I made it thru with a wife and two kids. But then again I prepare myself for life events. Have a job that pays me enough I can save for life events like a pandemic. Guess being an adult and making good decisions is not the norm. Next your gonna say he paid his UK taxes and should have the government look after him with a pension. How about saving money from 18 and building one's own pension.

 

The only person to blame is oneself if you think that people were forced to take the vaccine or risk being on the street. I would love to know how much money this English guy has on hand at this moment. If he, of she, does not have on hand enough money to live for a year without working (I do) their problem was not being forced to take the vaccine, their problem is not being prepared for life events.

 

 

Whether we like to admit it or not, we are all a product of our times. What you demonstrate above, while sensible to some extent, is a pure demonstration of the prevailing paradigm in modern, liberal, "survival of the fittest" societies where everyone is competing with everybody else.

 

The English guy in question is a typical example of the majority of people everywhere, I sincerely doubt he would have fared any better had he chosen to live and work in the 21st century UK.

 

You seem to have fared better and made smarter choices than most. Good for you. Liberal societies typically produce 3 winners for 7 losers. Nothing precludes one from finding this is a deleterious societal model, even if one is among the 3 winners.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

Never understand the hatred yanks have for their next leader.

Why can't you learn to love him as much as we love Mr Starmer.

As they are both out and out liars they cannot be trusted or "loved"!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

Never understand the hatred yanks have for their next leader.

Why can't you learn to love him as much as we love Mr Starmer.

Great, I love the wonderful British sense of humor. 

Like this Churchill quote:

"You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other alternatives."

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I agree, it's not worth the time and effort.

 

well...if only egoman would show up,  we'd have a reunion of the original Four Musketeers ( or crazy anti vaxxers to those who love us ).

 

Wishing y'all a happy new year ,  and may all your DNA  stay healthy and unburdened by what has been 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, xylophone said:

Another conspiracy theory disproven, apart from by those who want to believe nonsense......

 

Can the COVID-19 vaccine alter my DNA?

No. COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way. Both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines deliver instructions (genetic material) to our cells to start building protection against the virus that causes COVID-19. However, the material never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.

https://www.orangecountync.gov/Faq.aspx?QID=751

 

 COVID-19 vaccines do not alter DNA.

https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html

 

Claims that mRNA vaccines change human DNA are back

By iHeard STL • February 1, 2024

 

Despite being unsupported by research, claims about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines interfering with human DNA continue to circulate. This week, one in six adults (17%) surveyed in four states said they’d heard the claim in the last 7 days; 72% of those believed it could be true. 

Persistence of this claim may be due to concerns recently expressed by Florida’s Surgeon General that mRNA vaccines can carry foreign DNA into a cell. However, mRNA only enters the cell cytoplasm and does not enter the cell’s nucleus where human DNA is found. Messenger RNA (mRNA) in COVID-19 vaccines teaches cells to make a spike protein from the virus, helping the body fight the actual virus. Once the mRNA gives instructions to the cells, the body breaks it down so it cannot harm the body. 

https://hcrl.wustl.edu/claims-that-mrna-vaccines-change-human-dna-are-back/

 

Follow the science.......

 

And here some more follow the $cience...

image.png.3ce2eaafb0485d901e1aff79f38f313b.png

Australian drug regulator knows DNA fragments in mRNA vaccines can enter nucleus and integrate into genome, internal emails show

The Therapeutic Goods Administration withheld information on DNA contamination risks from the public, presenting a picture of certainty where there is none

Source: https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/bombshell-australian-drug-regulator

= = =

Internal emails from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that the regulator withheld knowledge of DNA contamination risks relating to the modRNA vaccines from the public, presenting a picture of certainty on safety where there is none.

Released under Freedom of Information (FOI), the cache of emails shows that high-level TGA staff knew elements of the modRNA vaccines can enter the cell nucleus and integrate into the genome, despite the agency’s official line that such events are not possible.

However, TGA personnel appear more preoccupied with “allaying fears in the public” than with investigating the potential risks.

Highlights

  • TGA staff acknowledge that DNA integration into the genome is possible

  • The TGA knows that the SV40 enhancer/promoter in the Pfizer vaccine can drag DNA into the nucleus of cells

  • Pfizer did not disclose the SV40 sequence to the regulator

  • TGA staff not aware of any testing for modRNA/DNA integration into human genome

Full article here > https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/bombshell-australian-drug-regulator

= = =

image.png

  • Like 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

well...if only egoman would show up,  we'd have a reunion of the original Four Musketeers ( or crazy anti vaxxers to those who love us ).

 

Wishing y'all a happy new year ,  and may all your DNA  stay healthy and unburdened by what has been 

 

Crazy antivaxxers enjoying their fourth "winter of severe illness and death" :coffee1:

 

image.png.18b302f01d1921c134e645f217a4ffa7.png

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
8 hours ago, mokwit said:

If that was directed at me, I am not saying only the polio vaccine was tested and effective, i don't know how you are able to to assume that is what I meant from from what I wrote.

 

The point i am making is that a vaccination is something that is given to stimulate immunity to a pathogen in advance. Polio vaccine is given as a preventative vaccine to give immunity, but is an exception in that Polio vaccine is also given post infection to hopefully halt the spread within the body and can be effective due to the way polio spreads. As someone has pointed out, Rabies vaccine is given post (assumed) innfection but there is a very narrow window and you are effectively immunising before the rabies virus has spread, again, the way Rabies spreads in the body makes this a viable treatment.

 

With Covid we went from being told that it would prevent infection to being told symptoms would be milder.

 

 

I am not a medical professional so these are my feelings on the issue.

 

There are a lot of people who interpret the word vaccine as to mean ONLY treatment that prevents the disease.  And the RNA covid vaccines only lessen the impact if one catches covid.  So this has some people up in arms over a definition of the word vaccine. 

 

IMO if it ends the widespread death and filling of hospitals I'll take the result either way.  And perhaps if they had sold it differently (what word other than vaccine I have no idea) we wouldn't have this debate. 

 

In fairness we are finding (I think) a higher than normal long term side effects of these vaccines and need an unbiased study to determine how widespread that is or if it is the new RNA stuff. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

 

 

 

In fairness we are finding (I think) a higher than normal long term side effects of these vaccines and need an unbiased study to determine how widespread that is or if it is the new RNA stuff. 

The long term side effects are the COVID itself, not the vaccine.

 

As with disproportionate ICU admissions, the evidence is that side effects such as chronic fatigue and memory loss are more prevalent in those people who were unvaccinated when they had COVID, than those who were.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...