The Resurgence of Jihadist Threats: A Call to Vigilance

[Social Media]

 

For decades, Israel has faced a grim reality: terror attacks perpetrated by extremists who seek to instill fear through violence. Yet, despite the gravity of these actions, such horrors often find a disturbing chorus of applause among certain groups in the West. College campuses and protest movements in cities like New York have echoed sentiments that effectively endorse these acts, creating an unsettling global ripple effect.

 

This issue transcends borders. Just before Christmas, Germany witnessed a Saudi immigrant wreak havoc by driving through a bustling Christmas market, leaving five dead and nearly 200 injured. A similar tragedy unfolded in New Orleans during New Year’s celebrations when an ISIS-affiliated individual drove a truck into a crowd, killing 14 and injuring dozens. These events underscore a harsh truth: the threat of jihadist violence persists, undiminished. With regions like Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen serving as breeding grounds for terrorism, the conditions that enabled the rise of groups like ISIS remain disturbingly intact.

 

In the aftermath of 9/11, the United States vowed to dismantle safe havens for terrorists, reducing ungoverned spaces where extremists could train and launch attacks. While initial efforts saw progress, the resurgence of jihadist strongholds underscores the fragility of these gains. Today, vigilance from intelligence agencies and military forces is imperative, as is the need for decisive action against emerging threats.

 

Domestically, the issue is equally pressing. The New Orleans attacker appears to have been radicalized within the United States, raising critical questions about online recruitment and extremist networks. It is vital that law enforcement agencies aggressively dismantle these networks while holding those who promote terrorism accountable. The work of intelligence professionals is commendable, yet societal complacency and misguided sensitivities hinder progress. Too often, cultural concerns are cited to deflect from addressing the real enablers of extremism.

 

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a prominent Muslim advocacy organization, has faced criticism for its connections to past terrorism cases and controversial statements by its leaders. Nihad Awad, CAIR’s executive director, recently described the October 7 violence in Gaza as a justified breaking of a siege. Ignoring the brutal atrocities committed that day, Awad’s remarks were met with applause from his audience. Such rhetoric, coupled with society’s reluctance to confront it, highlights a dangerous tolerance for extremist ideologies.

 

In New York, a pro-terror rally on New Year’s Day illustrated the alarming normalization of such views. Organized by groups like the Palestinian Youth Movement, the protest featured chants glorifying “intifada” and calls for Jews to “go back to Europe.” Imagine the outcry if similar sentiments were expressed by groups like the KKK. The disparity in public and institutional responses to these threats is a cause for concern.

 

It is time for Americans to demand accountability from those who promote or excuse terrorism. Whether on college campuses or city streets, voices that glorify violence must be challenged. The safety and moral integrity of our society depend on it.

 

Based on a report by NYP 2024-01-07

 

 

[jippytum]

 Radical Muslim residents of cities in many countries have taken advantage of open door immigration and lack of enforcement.

 They have become a threat to western society as we know it. 

The rise of people to the right of the political spectrum are welcome and long overdue

[JonnyF]

For something to be resurgent, doesn't it first have to go away?

[mikeymike100]

1 minute ago, jippytum said:

 Radical Muslim residents of cities in many countries have taken advantage of open door immigration and lack of enforcement.

 They have become a threat to western society as we know it. 

The rise of people to the right of the political spectrum are welcome and long overdue

You are absolutely correct, but countries like the UK have tended to ignore or at least hush these issues up, for fear of being called racist! Very sad state of affairs in the UK now!

[Geoffggi]

The only way to deal with radicals is to jail them then deport them & their families, for the home-grown radicals longer jail times & strict monitoring upon release.

[jippytum]

19 minutes ago, Geoffggi said:

The only way to deal with radicals is to jail them then deport them & their families, for the home-grown radicals longer jail times & strict monitoring upon release.

I agree 100%. Unfortunatly only the far Right are prepared to voice a strong opinion and they are ostracized and jailed for expressing what many citizens believe to be true. 

 

20 minutes ago, Geoffggi said:

The only way to deal with radicals is to jail them then deport them & their families, for the home-grown radicals longer jail times & strict monitoring upon release.

 

[brewsterbudgen]

1 hour ago, jippytum said:

I agree 100%. Unfortunatly only the far Right are prepared to voice a strong opinion and they are ostracized and jailed for expressing what many citizens believe to be true. 

 

 

 

Are the "far Right" about to be in power in the USA?  Or is Trump too soft?  It will be interesting to see how hard he will be.

[G_Money]

And now Biden continues to wreak havoc in his final days by releasing 11 Gitmo terrorist detainees.

 

If they hurry, Biden will allow them to sneak into the USA at the Southern Border before he leaves office.

 

 

[bradiston]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

And now Biden continues to wreak havoc in his final days by releasing 11 Gitmo terrorist detainees.

 

If they hurry, Biden will allow them to sneak into the USA at the Southern Border before he leaves office.

 

 

Held for over 20 years without charge? Where else in the world could that happen?

[G_Money]

1 minute ago, bradiston said:

Held for over 20 years without charge? Where else in the world could that happen?

Trust me, we’ll see these guys again very soon.

 

Thanks Joe!

[bradiston]

9 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Trust me, we’ll see these guys again very soon.

 

Thanks Joe!

With no evidence or proof of their involvement in 9/11, why? And why would I trust you?

[novacova]

15 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Trust me, we’ll see these guys again very soon.

Well of course, that’s the idea now isn’t it 

[Neeranam]

3 hours ago, jippytum said:

 Radical Muslim residents of cities in many countries have taken advantage of open door immigration and lack of enforcement.

 They have become a threat to western society as we know it. 

The rise of people to the right of the political spectrum are welcome and long overdue

You are lumping all Muslims into a stereotype by implying that Muslim immigrants are inherently radical or dangerous, which is simply untrue. Nearly all Muslims, whether immigrants or residents of their home countries, are peaceful, law-abiding individuals.

Labelling entire communities based on the actions of a small extremist minority is discriminatory and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. You probably think 9/11 happened in a vacuum and the US don't commit horrors in Muslim countries.  

[jippytum]

1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

You are lumping all Muslims into a stereotype by implying that Muslim immigrants are inherently radical or dangerous, which is simply untrue. Nearly all Muslims, whether immigrants or residents of their home countries, are peaceful, law-abiding individuals.

Labelling entire communities based on the actions of a small extremist minority is discriminatory and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. You probably think 9/11 happened in a vacuum and the US don't commit horrors in Muslim countries.  

I would suggest anyone who subscibes to your opinion on muslims especially should look at www. truthontrail. co. uk

The evidence of inceasing muslim domination and discrimination. sexual offences against UKChildren by Muslim gangs are well documented and the suject is been ignorned by Muslim councellors in the areas concerned. 

 

[Neeranam]

Just now, jippytum said:

I would suggest anyone who subscibes to your opinion on muslims especially should look at www. truthontrail. co. uk

The evidence of inceasing muslim domination and discrimination. sexual offences against UKChildren by Muslim gangs are well documented and the suject is been ignorned by Muslim councellors in the areas concerned. 

 

Have you any idea how racist you sound?

[Neeranam]

38 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Held for over 20 years without charge? Where else in the world could that happen?

Here's one Brits story, it criminal and heaven know why Bush and Blair are not in jail the evidence against them is overwhelming. 

 

Shaker Aamer: In his own words.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35049397

[Patong2021]

35 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Trust me, we’ll see these guys again very soon.

 

Thanks Joe!

Maybe so, but it is wrong to hold people without charge for 20 years.

If they misbehave. terminate them like Israel  asnd Arab countries try to do.

[jippytum]

8 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Have you any idea how racist you sound?

Perhaps to people who do not see the problem of increasing radical muslim donination 

[sherwood]

9 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Have you any idea how racist you sound?

There's that word again being used as an excuse by someone with no grip on reality.

[Neeranam]

3 minutes ago, jippytum said:

Perhaps to people who do not see the problem of increasing radical muslim donination 

What religion are you? I'd bet there have been or are radical groups in it. 

[jippytum]

4 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

What religion are you? I'd bet there have been or are radical groups in it. 

Absolutely. That doesn't  mean  their actions should not be subject of debate. 

[Neeranam]

11 minutes ago, sherwood said:

There's that word again being used as an excuse by someone with no grip on reality.

Look at why that word bothers you, and no need for personal insults. 

Religious intolerance toward immigrants is usually rooted in racism, even if disguised as security concerns. Immigrants from Muslim countries face prejudice — religious intolerance and racism — are deeply intertwined. 

[Neeranam]

8 minutes ago, jippytum said:

Absolutely. That doesn't  mean  their actions should not be subject of debate. 

Well which one is it? I'd love to know which religion promotes religious intolerance.

 

Thailand's constitution upholds religious freedom and emphasizes the importance of religious tolerance. It prohibits discrimination based on religious belief and allows individuals to practice any religion of their choice. The government officially recognizes five religious groups: Buddhism, Islam, Brahman Hinduism, Sikhism, and Christianity.

[bradiston]

37 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You are lumping all Muslims into a stereotype by implying that Muslim immigrants are inherently radical or dangerous, which is simply untrue. Nearly all Muslims, whether immigrants or residents of their home countries, are peaceful, law-abiding individuals.

Labelling entire communities based on the actions of a small extremist minority is discriminatory and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. You probably think 9/11 happened in a vacuum and the US don't commit horrors in Muslim countries.  

Sure. There are 1.9 billion Muslims globally. The largest number are in the Asia-Pacific region. Are they causing you any grief? How many have you met out here? I used to live in Trad province. Many Muslims there. You'd be surprised how many well educated highly skilled architects, engineers are Muslim. They don't brandish it around though. It's not like they're in your face, is it? Not like some! Same down south, though I've not lived there. Take as you find. If you travel with a head full of preconceived ideas, what's the point of travelling at all?

[Neeranam]

16 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Sure. There are 1.9 billion Muslims globally. The largest number are in the Asia-Pacific region. Are they causing you any grief? How many have you met out here? I used to live in Trad province. Many Muslims there. You'd be surprised how many well educated highly skilled architects, engineers are Muslim. They don't brandish it around though. It's not like they're in your face, is it? Not like some! Same down south, though I've not lived there. Take as you find. If you travel with a head full of preconceived ideas, what's the point of travelling at all?

Indeed. The Islamophobic Brits I know are usually the type that are miffed as their jellied eel shops have been replaced by kebab shops and they go on about how if Reggie and Ronnie Kray were still around, there would be no crime. It's getting old and resistance to change. Rather ironic as they are all immigrants in Thailand, where they are generally peacefully accepted. 

[bradiston]

12 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Indeed. The Islamophobic Brits I know are usually the type that are miffed as their jellied eel shops have been replaced by kebab shops and they go on about how if Reggie and Ronnie Kray were still around, there would be no crime. It's getting old and resistance to change. Rather ironic as they are all immigrants in Thailand, where they are generally peacefully accepted. 

Yes, and what gets my goat about foreign criticism and ladyboy bashing, is, Thailand is, as you say, a generally peaceloving and extremely tolerant country. They don't bash ladyboys as most grew up with at least one in their village. Thai women seem to really value their company as they are an extremely good laugh generally, expert at make up, beauty products, and all things "feminine", as that's how they see themselves, and intelligent, in my experience. Why bash them? They see themselves as women, so who are you or I to argue? If you take the time to get to know one or two, they usually have extraordinary stories about their lives. Growing up as a lady boy in rural Thailand, some married to foreigners, property owning, smart entrepreneurs etc etc. There are many in the Thai civil service. In Thailand, it's just not a big deal.

[Bkk Brian]

10 hours ago, Social Media said:

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a prominent Muslim advocacy organization, has faced criticism for its connections to past terrorism cases and controversial statements by its leaders. Nihad Awad, CAIR’s executive director, recently described the October 7 violence in Gaza as a justified breaking of a siege.

The extremely irresponsible statements from terrorist supporters in official positions that help drive Jihadist attacks throughout the world. 

[mokwit]

2 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Look at why that word bothers you, and no need for personal insults. 

Religious intolerance toward immigrants is usually rooted in racism, even if disguised as security concerns. Immigrants from Muslim countries face prejudice — religious intolerance and racism — are deeply intertwined. 

i Think it might be rooted in fear of being blown up on your way to work and having your daughter groomed, but you just carry on with the fantasy in your head.

[mokwit]

3 hours ago, Neeranam said:

You are lumping all Muslims into a stereotype by implying that Muslim immigrants are inherently radical or dangerous, which is simply untrue. Nearly all Muslims, whether immigrants or residents of their home countries, are peaceful, law-abiding individuals.

Labelling entire communities based on the actions of a small extremist minority is discriminatory and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. You probably think 9/11 happened in a vacuum and the US don't commit horrors in Muslim countries.  

These silly, silly people with their Islamophobia.

 

 

[brewsterbudgen]

35 minutes ago, mokwit said:

These silly, silly people with their Islamophobia.

 

 

 

One extremist, radical preacher, well-known for his homophobia, anti-semitism and extreme views, is not representative of the approximately 1.9 billion muslims in the world!