Jump to content

Crash in Nakhon Sawan: Driver Swerves to Avoid Cat, Hits & Kills Pedestrian


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

IMG_1453.jpeg
Picture from responders.

 

A crash occurred early morning on January 7,on Route 3330 in the Ban Phu Khamin area, Tak Fa district, when a car driver veered off the road, resulting in the death of a 59-year-old woman.

 

The incident took place near an auto repair shop, where the red plated EV driver lost control and ended up off-road. Approximately 10 metres from the car, the lifeless body of the woman was found underneath the rear section of a parked lorry. Nearby, a dead cat was discovered on the roadside about 70 metres from the crash site.

 

According to eyewitnesses, the vehicle, driven by a woman in her early 30s, was travelling at high speed from Tak Fa district towards Phaisali district. The driver reportedly swerved to avoid the cat but struck it, then could not regain control of the vehicle, causing it to leave the road. The car struck the victim, who was preparing to set up her roadside broom stall. Her body was carried along with the vehicle before being thrown into the rear of the parked lorry undergoing repairs.

 

The driver, who sustained facial injuries, was taken to Tak Fa Hospital for treatment. Relatives of the driver identified her as a nurse who was on her way to open a clinic in Pho Prasat sub-district, Phaisali district.

 

Preliminary investigations suggest that the driver attempted to avoid hitting the cat, leading to the fatal collision. Police from the Tak Fa district are continuing to investigate the incident to determine the exact cause of the accident.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2025-01-08

 

image.png

 

  • Sad 4
Posted
Just now, Grumpy one said:

Hit the cat, they have 9 lives

 

You don't know how many lives a Thai has, but they still truly believe they come back after death.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Why was the lorry having repairs?

 

 Why so much smoke and mirrors in the article?…the bottom lin is the driver was going too fast for the conditions thus not under control…no different than someone tailgating…an accident waiting to happen 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Missing some details in the report. How fast was she actually driving? Was it a village zone or just random houses along the road? Makes a lot of difference if you swerve with 90 or 50 km/h...

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Peterphuket said:

You don't know how many lives a Thai has, but they still truly believe they come back after death.

 

From the  quote by online killing game addicts?

In a virtual world, the life is resettable; can re-start anytime, even after got shot dead.

Surprisingly, some kids(certainly not everyone) really believe it can happen in their real life as well.

 

some kids believe can live again after getting killed - Google Search

Posted
9 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

According to eyewitnesses, the vehicle, driven by a woman in her early 30s, was travelling at high speed

And a red plate shows it was pretty new, so the driver was inexperienced at driving it.

There's your answer.

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

I'm sure he didn't swerve to avoid the cat, KNOWING he would hit someone. That's the definition of an ACCIDENT. 

I would also swerve or brake to avoid hitting an animal, including a human. But would I swerve to avoid hitting a human, KNOWING I would then hit some other animal? I hope I never have to make that decision. 

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, Liverpool Lou said:
2 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:
1 hour ago, Taboo2 said:

The driver should be sent to prison.  Efin More Run!

Do prisons take dead people? 

She's not dead.

 

9 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

car driver veered off the road, resulting in the death of a 59-year-old woman

Oh OK, I read a different article 

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SAFETY FIRST said:
10 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

car driver veered off the road, resulting in the death of a 59-year-old woman

Oh OK, I read a different article 

No, it's the same article, you just didn't read it.

  • Agree 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, it's the same article, you just didn't read it.

You didn't read my comment. 

Where did I say that the driver was dead?

 

Two can play this game. 

 

Ha, ha, I asked a simple question 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

It's a very simple moral to this story, if you're in a car or a truck, never, ever swerve to avoid a cat.

 

Cats are very expendable and rarely do damage to a vehicle. People are not expendable. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I'm sure he didn't swerve to avoid the cat, KNOWING he would hit someone. That's the definition of an ACCIDENT. 

I would also swerve or brake to avoid hitting an animal, including a human. But would I swerve to avoid hitting a human, KNOWING I would then hit some other animal? I hope I never have to make that decision. 

OK. A male nurse then.

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

It's a very simple moral to this story, if you're in a car or a truck, never, ever swerve to avoid a cat.

 

Cats are very expendable and rarely do damage to a vehicle. People are not expendable. 

Sure about that?

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...