Teeth extraction cost
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
-
43
/Featured Quiz4 October - Weekly Featured Quiz - General Knowledge
I just completed this quiz. My Score 100/100 My Time 180 seconds -
9,194
Electric Vehicles in Thailand
Eloquent? The statement lacked any support or citation. So neither articulate nor persuasive and therefore definitely not “Eloquent” Pilgrim? Maybe if he continues his wanderings to another place -
31
Allegations Against the Biden Family: A Web of Accusations and Controversy
There are certain points in this article that should be addressed: "One of the most contentious allegations involves Hunter Biden’s attempted deal in 2017 with CEFC, China’s largest private energy company. An email retrieved from Hunter’s discarded laptop allegedly referenced “the big guy” receiving a 10% stake, a term Hunter’s former business associate Tony Bobulinski claimed referred to Joe Biden. While Hunter testified that the suggestion was made without his father’s knowledge and did not materialize, Comer’s investigation has identified $8 million in payments from Chinese sources to Biden family members and associates. " The email may have referenced "the big guy" receiving a 10% stake, but this is misleading. It was formulated as a question "10% for the big guy?" And as later text shows, Hunter Biden said he broached the subject with his father and was given an "emphatic no." And who knows if he ever raised the issue of a deal at all with his father? After all, Devon Archer said H. Biden told him that he would lie about the influence he had with his father In order to impress people. In addition, this occurred when Biden was no longer the VP. So even if he did profit from the deal, which he didn't, what would have been the crime? “In Russia, a 2014 payment of $3.5 million from Elena Baturina, then Russia’s richest woman, to Hunter Biden’s business partner Devon Archer has drawn attention. Republicans allege that a subsequent dinner involving Baturina, Hunter, Joe Biden, and Archer suggests a possible quid pro quo. They point to the fact that Baturina was not subjected to U.S. sanctions as evidence of potential favoritism.” It wasn’t noted that. Elena Baturina may once have been Russia's wealthiest woman, but when she did the deal with Archer, she had moved to the UK and was living there since 2010. And that's because she was on the outs with Putin and Co. Not only was she not a crony of Putin's, but, in fact, Russia had a warrant out for her arrest. The sanctions applied only to those who were considered to be associates of Putin. “Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian gas company Burisma has also been a focal point. Appointed to Burisma’s board in 2014, he earned an annual salary of $1 million during a period when Joe Biden, as vice president, was overseeing U.S. relations with Ukraine. While Republicans argue Hunter’s role was tied to his father’s influence, Biden has maintained that his actions regarding Ukraine were aligned with international consensus, including the European Union and the International Monetary Fund.” It isn't just Biden's claim that his actions were aligned with International consensus, It’s a fact. As the source article in The Times notes: "Republicans allege that the position was not a real job and the appointment was a reward for his father’s pressure on the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin as prosecutor-general — though the removal of Shokin, who was accused of failing to pursue politicians for corruption, was also favoured by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund." In addition, Devon Archer specifically testified he was told by the people at Burisma that Shokin was in cahoots with Burisma and that his firing was a bad thing for them. He also testified that Hunter Biden told him that he lied to the management of Burisma by claiming he had influence over his father's decisions. -
47
Can anyone explain to me why there are cannabis shops everywhere?
Nope, no sarcasm intended -
67
Hegseth has been confirmed.
Going back to Rummy in 2001, the day before 9/11 announcing that $4 trillion was unaccounted for, that's over 20 years of not being able to handle money. (And it didn't start or end with Rumsfeld) It's time to do something different, and I'm willing to give Hegseth a chance. He doesn't need to be an audit and money guru. He needs to know who he can trust to be the guru who's going to hire a team of competent people. And I doubt that guru is even going to come with a military background. Finance isn't what they teach...
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now