Just now, sandyf said:

You mean President Musk.

 

Thought it was First Lady Musk?

19 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Musk is not simply engaging in free search, he is, with the aid of Cummings, attempting to sabotage UK politics, I have provided a link.

 

Seems to me he is highlighting the failure of the state to protect thousands of underage girls from being brutally raped.   The fact that Labour are trying everything they can to stop Musk from speaking about this suggests they have a lot to hide and are indeed complicit.  Being the stupid morons that they are means that all they achieve by this is that Musk's voice is amplified even more due to the Streisand effect.  

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s trying to oust the leader of the UK’s elected Government.

 

Dies it need to be more obvious than that?

 

Isn't that what his Majesty's opposition are tasked with trying to achieve on a daily basis ?

He is a total social misfit, and is not wearing his wealth, nor his power lightly. Musk appears to have extremist tendencies. I am hoping he goes on one of his Mars missions, but we all know he does not have nearly enough courage for something like that. I have respect for his achievements, but zero respect for the small man. 

5 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Seems to me he is highlighting the failure of the state to protect thousands of underage girls from being brutally raped.   The fact that Labour are trying everything they can to stop Musk from speaking about this suggests they have a lot to hide and are indeed complicit.  Being the stupid morons that they are means that all they achieve by this is that Musk's voice is amplified even more due to the Streisand effect.  

That wasn’t a failure of this Government.

4 minutes ago, James105 said:

Seems to me he is highlighting the failure of the state to protect thousands of underage girls from being brutally raped.

You cannot cherry pick and say it is ok.

Everything the pair of them has said has to be taken into consideration to see the overall picture.

5 minutes ago, realfunster said:

 

Isn't that what his Majesty's opposition are tasked with trying to achieve on a daily basis ?

No it is not.

 

That’s what elections are for.

 

https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/opposition-the/

But it's ok if 100 raging loony lefty labour supporters go to US and interefe...

1 minute ago, baansgr said:

But it's ok if 100 raging loony lefty labour supporters go to US and interefe...

They were not trying to sabotage an elected Government. 
 

 

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s trying to oust the leader of the UK’s elected Government.

 

Does it need to be more obvious than that?

 

Not sure what you mean. He is simply tweeting. 

 

Do you mean like when Labour were trying to prevent getting Trump elected?

 

You had no issue with that. 

13 minutes ago, sandyf said:

You mean President Musk.

 

You seem confused.

 

Biden is President.

 

Trump is President elect.

 

Musk will head up D.O.G.E.

 

Hope that helps... 

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Not sure what you mean. He is simply tweeting. 

 

Do you mean like when Labour were trying to prevent getting Trump elected?

 

You had no issue with that. 

False equivalence and misrepresentation of what Musk himself has are his intentions.

 

You’re on a roll.

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That wasn’t a failure of this Government.

 

It was a failure of Starmer's DPP. 

He's also offered to pony up $100 million to the party of his choosing - a bit of a stretch to call that freedom of speech.

 

And for that matter, he's been banning people on Twitter who disagree with him and tweaking the algorithm to boost those who do.

 

I'd go as far as to say it's a mass propaganda campaign simply because he has some beef with Starmer. 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That wasn’t a failure of this Government.

Indeed. I lived in Sheffield at the time the Rotherham scandal broke and there is little doubt the police held back for fear of accusations of racism.

Successive governments have struggled to deal with the problem, but it is a UK problem. The US tends to use brute force to solve problems and I can't see that working out very well.

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That wasn’t a failure of this Government.

 

It was a failure of the head of this current Government.

 

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

It was a failure of Starmer's DPP. 

How so Starmer brought the first prosecutions of these gangs.

22 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Musk asked X users on Sunday night whether the U.S. should “liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/06/elon-musk-asks-if-us-should-liberate-britain.html

 

Stick to the point posted rather than making things up.

 

He simply asked a question as a way of highlighting the tyranny of the current Labour government. He's drawing global attention to a very serious issue and should be commended. 

 

The fact they are so terrified of someone who speaks the truth and cannot be silenced is fascinating and amusing in equal measure. 

 

If he was a poor white Brit they'd have jailed him by now for being "grossly offensive". 😄

 

No such luck with Musk. The panic is palpable. 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

How do Starmer brought the first prosecutions of these gangs.

 

He may have eventually, begrudgingly done so but only years after the likes of Tommy Robinson and others were shouting from the rooftops that this was happening.   If someone like Robinson was head of CPS then tens of thousands of brutal rapes of children would have been prevented.  

 

I'm sure if Jimmy Saville had lived for another decade he would have eventually, begrudgingly prosecuted him too.  

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How do Starmer brought the first prosecutions of these gangs.

 

A token gesture given the scale of the problem. He was inept and did as little as he could get away with doing. 

 

If he did such a great job, why did he whip his MP's into voting against an inquiry?

 

Why not, if he has nothing to hide? 

1 minute ago, James105 said:

 

He may have eventually, begrudgingly done so but only years after the likes of Tommy Robinson and others were shouting from the rooftops that this was happening.   If someone like Robinson was head of CPS then tens of thousands of brutal rapes of children would have been prevented.  

 

I'm sure if Jimmy Saville had lived for another decade he would have eventually, begrudgingly prosecuted him too.  

Yaxley Lennon played no part in any pedophile gang member being brought to justice.

 

The CPS prosecute, they don’t receive reports of crime, investigate or charge.

 

 

That’s the police’s job.

 

If the Police don’t charge, the CPS can’t prosecute.

 

The police are not a branch of the CPS.

 

 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

A token gesture given the scale of the problem. He was inept and did as little as he could get away with doing. 

 

If he did such a great job, why did he whip his MP's into voting against an inquiry?

 

Why not, if he has nothing to hide? 

Back to your conspiracy backstop again I see

 

There was no vote on a second inquiry, the vote was to pass or kill the Children’s Welfare and Schools Bill.

 

Labour voted for it, the Tories and Reform voted against the bill.

 

 

Freedom of Speech is Paramount.

7 hours ago, Social Media said:

A government source confirmed the heightened vigilance, stating, "We keep a close eye on how disinformation and hate can proliferate, including online."

Most hate and disinformation is spread by governments and their security forces.

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How so Starmer brought the first prosecutions of these gangs.

 

Did he really ? Have you got a link to that, seeing as you like to ask others for links.

 

Here is the reality from the BBC

 

Quote

Sir Keir was appointed head of the CPS in 2008 and held the role for five years. He became an MP in 2015.

The CPS was criticised for a decision not to proceed with a prosecution in Rochdale on the basis that it viewed the main victim as "unreliable" following an investigation between August 2008 and August 2009.

 

Note who the head of  the CPS was, ultimately responsible for the decision not to proceed with the prosecution.

 

This guy brought the first prosecution

 

Quote

That decision was overturned later by Nazir Afzal in 2011 after being appointed by Sir Keir as the CPS chief prosecutor for north-west England.

 

He told Starmer, the head of the CPS to wind his neck in and he was prosecuting.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo

 

Starmer, as the Head of CPS and DPP, did not know that the CPS were prosecuting Sub Postmasters.

 

2 massive scandals that both Labour and  Starmer are neck deep in.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Back to your conspiracy backstop again I see

 

There was no vote on a second inquiry, the vote was to pass or kill the Children’s Welfare and Schools Bill.

 

Labour voted for it, the Tories and Reform voted against the bill.

 

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1997900/labour-vote-down-grooming-inquiry

 

 

In about 5-10 years Musk will be named king of the west. Us common people will just submit for our own good. Half of us are too retarded to even have our own opinions heard

51 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s trying to oust the leader of the UK’s elected Government.

 

Does it need to be more obvious than that?

I thought he was trying to oust Starmer.

Are you claiming Starmer is good for the UK people?

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1997900/labour-vote-down-grooming-inquiry

 

 

The kind of rightwing press misrepresentation of facts that plays well to those who don’t understand the second reading of a  Bill is not an opportunity to add amendments.

 

It is however the last opportunity to kill the Bill, which is precisely what Badenoch instructed her MPs to do:

 

 

9 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

In about 5-10 years Musk will be named king of the west. Us common people will just submit for our own good. Half of us are too retarded to even have our own opinions heard

That might just be his plan.