Jump to content

Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons Slammed as a 'Grotesque Display' of Power by Schiff


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Yagoda said:

So you would deny him a firearm because of his politics?

FFS read what I said - I’m denying him nothing! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

No. It means Trump can't weaponize the DOJ to invent crimes against them, thus satisfying his vindictiveness.

just like they did against Trump for the last four years, you really do live on the wrong side of the fence

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

It was the criminal justice system working the way it should, with criminals.

 

The message the Secret Service get is this guy is not worth taking a bullet for.

 

The correct spelling is "loser", which only illustrates your own status.

 

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

It was the criminal justice system working the way it should, with criminals.

 

The message the Secret Service get is this guy is not worth taking a bullet for.

 

The correct spelling is "loser", which only illustrates your own status.

you must really be the life of the party, so much better than everyone else

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So its other than what he says. Good. And how do you know he will be able to get a firearm? Are there background checks? Have you ever purchased a firearm in the USA? 

 

 

 

He is a resident of Arizona. Under Arizona law, you do not need a background check to buy a gun from a private party in Arizona.  He can go to one of the weekly gun shows and purchase anything he wants.

Posted
2 minutes ago, flexomike said:

just like they did against Trump for the last four years, you really do live on the wrong side of the fence

Double standard? You claim it is wrong and then support doing it.

Posted

 

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Trump being Trump is no excuse, dude!

It might work a little in his insane speech.

But pardoning violent criminals who assaulted police officers when posing as a law and order president is an ACTION.

DISGUSTING!

Not as disgusting as pardonng  a man that created the COVID19 pandemic killing millions of people worldwide

  • Love It 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

 

Not as disgusting as pardonng  a man that created the COVID19 pandemic killing millions of people worldwide

Trump was vaccinated and probably saved his life 

Posted
47 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Here you go lazy boy:

 

 


Sorry pal, maybe you didn't read the thread.

The poster said she admitted to "deliberately under manning the capitol security that day, to get the exact result that they got. 

 

She wanted it to happen.  She needed it to happen."

Still waiting for that video. The one you shared in no way supports that ridiculous claim.

Posted
3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Dementia.

Let's see now, on day one in office, Trump was signing executive orders in the Oval office, talking to his staffers and asking questions, at the same time he was answering questions from the press in the Oval office and joking with some of them. No auto cue, no written speech, all in real time. And you say dementia?? You need to look in the mirror!

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Let's see now, on day one in office, Trump was signing executive orders in the Oval office, talking to his staffers and asking questions, at the same time he was answering questions from the press in the Oval office and joking with some of them. No auto cue, no written speech, all in real time. And you say dementia?? You need to look in the mirror!

He said Spain was a BRIC country 😀. Dementia or just pure stupidity. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Sorry pal, maybe you didn't read the thread.

The poster said she admitted to "deliberately under manning the capitol security that day, to get the exact result that they got. 

 

She wanted it to happen.  She needed it to happen."

Still waiting for that video. The one you shared in no way supports that ridiculous claim.

 

Now that one little link is not good enough for you because the wording is not the same?

 

Try another shop.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

It was the criminal justice system working the way it should, with criminals.

 

The message the Secret Service get is this guy is not worth taking a bullet for.

 

The correct spelling is "loser", which only illustrates your own status.

IMO they were not sufficiently criminal to deserve a prison sentence. I don't care what you think.

 

The Secret Service don't get the choice, but it speaks to your intellect that you think they get a choice.

 

I spelled it that way on purpose, but you apparently missed that and went all grammar police on me. LOL.

 

It's you Trump haters that are the loooooosers. Enjoy the next 4 years- you deserve Trump in your face every day.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

He said Spain was a BRIC country 😀. Dementia or just pure stupidity. 

 

If you prefer dementia in your boss you all should have worked harder to keep Joe there.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WorriedNoodle said:

Some rioters openly carried rifles and handguns, displaying them in an intimidating manner and causing fear among the Capitol Police and members of Congress. 

BS. I watched the entire thing as it was happening and there were NO GUNS displayed by the protestors.

 

No wonder you didn't provide a link as you made that up.

 

Your BS post is the first time in 4 years that I've seen anyone claim that they were carrying weapons openly.

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Now that one little link is not good enough for you because the wording is not the same?

 

Try another shop.

 

 


The link is not good enough because it doesn't show the same meaning as what was claimed. Not even close, not by a million miles.

Try harder.

(It doesn't matter how hard you try, you know and I know there is no videos of her admitting to deliberately undermanning the capitol so that morons would riot and invade it as that is the "result" she wanted, the "result" she needed)

Posted
12 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

If you prefer dementia in your boss you all should have worked harder to keep Joe there.

Maybe you have dementia - Joe was not a running for office. 😀

  • Haha 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Maybe you have dementia - Joe was not a running for office. 😀

 

He was until July 21. Remember?

 

He still thinks he would have won. 555

 

 

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


The link is not good enough because it doesn't show the same meaning as what was claimed. Not even close, not by a million miles.

Try harder.

(It doesn't matter how hard you try, you know and I know there is no videos of her admitting to deliberately undermanning the capitol so that morons would riot and invade it as that is the "result" she wanted, the "result" she needed)

 

Not good enough? I'm not going back pages and pages to dig for quotes. So, OK, I won't try harder.

 

Try listening to Steven Sund's testimony. Pelosi didn't admit anything much in there either. In fact she deemed very quiet for the whole period up until the riot - not like afterwards of course - and she was not involved in the J6 hearings either. Curiouser and curiouser.

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

BS. I watched the entire thing as it was happening and there were NO GUNS displayed by the protestors.

 

No wonder you didn't provide a link as you made that up.

 

Your BS post is the first time in 4 years that I've seen anyone claim that they were carrying weapons openly.

Wrong. There were at least 5 charges of firearms possession.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/us-capitol-attack-rioters-had-weapons-including-firearms-2025-01-16/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...