Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got to be honest, I'm a bit confused about Trump's attitude to Canada. He can't seriously expect them to become the 51st state so there must be something else at play - any guesses? 

 

Setting that to the side, I can see why he got annoyed re illegal immigration from Canada - Mexicans worked out they could fly there and enter overland as mentioned on this link. 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-tariffs-immigration-canada-b2653974.html

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Put a gun to my head and I'll come up with two theories. 

 

1. He's trolling Trudeau and the Liberals, trying to get Poilievre elected so he can join in the anti-woke agenda. 

 

Or:

 

2. He's going to drag Canada into the Greenland - Northwest Passage issue and get them to support hIS demand for Greenland to come under the control of the USA. 

 

But truthfully I don't know what's behind all this? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Trump thinks in terms of real estate. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he thought he could force Canada into a shotgun wedding.

 

Canada is supplying 50% of America's oil, which would be a huge bonus.

 

Perhaps he is thinking like Lyndon Johnson, it's better to have Canada inside the tent p!ssing out, than outside the tent p!ssing in.

Posted
Just now, Lacessit said:

Trump thinks in terms of real estate. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he thought he could force Canada into a shotgun wedding.

 

Canada is supplying 50% of America's oil, which would be a huge bonus.

 

Perhaps he is thinking like Lyndon Johnson, it's better to have Canada inside the tent p!ssing out, than outside the tent p!ssing in.

Absolutely. He's easy to read if you just pay attention.

Remember his bizarro world video he showed to the North Korean despot showing developments of casinos and beach resorts there? 

Another interesting detail. Why does he have a hard on for Panama.

Look into his history with a Trump tower there for a clue. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

Someone explain this to me ....

 

So the American company pay the tarriffs, not Canada. Why Canada so bothered then?

 

 

The American consumers pay because the importers pass on costs.

So they buy less.

Canada loses jobs and suffers economically.

So Canada retaliates.

Trade war.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, theblether said:

1. He's trolling Trudeau and the Liberals, trying to get Poilievre elected so he can join in the anti-woke agenda. 

 

Trudeau had resigned and won't run in the upcoming election.

Poilievre will be the next Prime Minister and that has been in the wind for the last couple of years, nothing to do with the US

(I'll be voting for him)

 

It's kind of funny because we Canadian are pretty laid back and we do a lot of squabbling amongst ourselves but this latest effort has united the country 100%

 

 

image.png.ba9db761c2264fc6ddad6072d7133837.png

 

https://x.com/SunGarrioch/status/1885844148563099971?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1885844148563099971|twgr^aec444ad9850a40a68284186e9487de2f48d5952|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ctvnews.ca%2Fottawa%2Farticle%2Fhockey-fans-boo-us-national-anthem-at-ottawa-senators-game-after-trump-imposes-tariffs%2F

Posted

Canada should strike a deal with the EU on joint development of Greenland. It would be the ideal partner for Greenland.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, kwonitoy said:

(I'll be voting for him)

 

It's kind of funny because we Canadian are pretty laid back and we do a lot of squabbling amongst ourselves but this latest effort has united the country 100%

 

No it hasn't. You're going to be let down by Pierre. Canada was already lost 20 years ago.

Posted
3 hours ago, candide said:

Canada should strike a deal with the EU on joint development of Greenland. It would be the ideal partner for Greenland.

Good idea, we already share a border with Denmark

Hans Island, claimed by Denmark and by Canada,

So we did what adults do and split it down the middle

 

image.png.0b7e72b9b10f445a81522e2201fc7abb.png

Posted

I understand all of the above, but don't understand this 

 

If America declared a trade war with everyone, how does that benefit them? They should have punished either Canada or mexico, not both at the same time  

 

they can't build factories overnight.

 

can't wait for Yanks to complain about the price of eggs and healthcare 

Posted

Note that he wants to annex Canada and make it the 51st state. He says so AGAIN explicitly today on his "truth" social thingie. But why doesn't he want to annex Mexico? Hmm? Could it be -- Mexicans!

Another crazy thing about this. The insufferable sane washers that keep saying don't believe Trump when he says he wants to do crazy stuff are a big part of the problem. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Celsius said:

I understand all of the above, but don't understand this 

 

If America declared a trade war with everyone, how does that benefit them? They should have punished either Canada or mexico, not both at the same time  

 

they can't build factories overnight.

 

can't wait for Yanks to complain about the price of eggs and healthcare 

Hes punishing the countries that have been taking advantage of the US, which is everyone basically

  • Haha 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Canada is supplying 50% of America's oil, which would be a huge bonus.

 

Where do you get your pearls of wisdom?  The USA is a net exporter of oil.  If you took Canadian oil completely off the table, we'd swap out a couple of valves and reroute a few tankers and the Canadian oil would soon be replaced with oil from elsewhere.  It would be painful for a few months...

 

Canada, OTOH, would be royally hosed.  Because they're extremely limited in their capacity to ship oil anywhere beside the USA.  I think somewhere around 75% of their oil would be locked in Canada because of the port limitations.  They need the US market more than Americans need Canada's oil.

 

So who's the crazy one?

 

Posted

Those of us who support the fight of Ukrainians for their sovereignty can't be encouraged by Trump's attempt to annex Canada. The Kremlin propagandists are eating it up. 

Posted
Just now, Jingthing said:

Those of us who support the fight of Ukrainians for their sovereignty can't be encouraged by Trump's attempt to annex Canada. The Kremlin propagandists are eating it up. 

 

I know that mentioning the syndrome around Trump is blocked, but are we allowed to mention PDS?

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

I know that mentioning the syndrome around Trump is blocked, but are we allowed to mention PDS?

 

I bet you're a Tucker Carlson fanboy.

Posted
9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Because truthfully you've been totally clueless about what Trump  and the maga fascist movement has really been about for the duration.

 

555 Say's the guy who was calling Hillary & Kamala madame President & telling everyone to get used to it because its a done deal. I guess some folks definition of clueless is different 🤔

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...