Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Elvis Presley said:

Canada should be another US state.

 

That nut-job Trudeau has destroyed the country. 

 

Incorporate it into the USA and watch it prosper.

 

It should not be a state, it should be a union....like EU.

 

Do you really want Quebec be a part of USA? Think before you post Bob.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, hotsun said:

Maybe you dont live there, and dont know how many criminals that the Biden administration allowed into the country

I get it , this is political soapbox, so the entire history of Americas misdeeds is all because of the last presidential term you don't agree with.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

If the USA wanted to invade would it be a five days operation like Putin presumed in Ukraine or could or would Canada actually defend itself.

I find it hard to believe that the the U.S. military generals, all the way down to the troops on the ground, would have the will to invade Canada. Its one thing to send an army to a middle eastern country, but Canada ? 

  • Agree 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Elvis Presley said:

Canada should be another US state.

 

That nut-job Trudeau has destroyed the country. 

 

Incorporate it into the USA and watch it prosper.

Yes, Canadians can have the benefit of Obamacare, high pharmaceutical costs, America's IRS. Plus a new generation of carpetbaggers heading north.

 

Do you have any idea how stupid your post is?

  • Thanks 2
Posted

How many times do I have to tell you people. These tarrifs are simply a way to show income so the billionaire tax cuts can be made permanent. Don't make me repeat it again.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Yes, Canadians can have the benefit of Obamacare, high pharmaceutical costs, America's IRS. Plus a new generation of carpetbaggers heading north.

 

Do you have any idea how stupid your post is?

not as stupid as your reply.

  • Sad 1
Posted
6 hours ago, candide said:

Canada should strike a deal with the EU on joint development of Greenland. It would be the ideal partner for Greenland.

Because the enuits have done really well in Canada? Maybe offer them a bit more prosperous future in Greenland? 

 

Just joking, but seriously, Greenland have to come back to Norway, we will take good care of them. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Because truthfully you've been totally clueless about what Trump  and the maga fascist movement has really been about for the duration.

do explain it once and for all here and put an end to the discussion 

Posted
12 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You're totally wrong.

He does seriously want to gobble up Canada.

He's a PSYCHOPATH! He has delusions of being seen as the greatest president for so increasing the USA's territory.

The feeling from Canada is not mutual.

He is now seen internationally in the same light as Putin.

Sucks to be a loser doesnt it? Your screeching about Trump and Putin sounds increasingly more hysterical and deranged

  • Confused 3
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

You're from Dorset Bob.

You probably think that Canada is the next stop on the Southern National bus after Lulworth Cove!

My name is Elvis and I was born in Tupelo. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, Elvis Presley said:

not as stupid as your reply.

What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

 

SFB

  • Agree 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Yes, Canadians can have the benefit of Obamacare, high pharmaceutical costs, America's IRS. Plus a new generation of carpetbaggers heading north.

 

Gosh.  Just a few months ago, Obamacare was the best thing to ever happen to Americans, according to the lefties.  Because it wasn't Trump's idea...

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, jas007 said:

Why not just take it at face value?  Why should the USA be supporting Canada? And why should the USA not be concerned with the continued flow of illegals and drugs across the border?  The USA needs nothing from Canada.  And Canada is already in trouble, economically.  So they either change a few policies or perish.  Why wouldn't that be Trump's thinking?

Is the US supporting Canada? Is there a continuous flow of illegals and drugs from Canada to the US?

Does the US need nothing from Canada?

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

IIRC Trump had no ideas, 4 years produced zilch by way of a new health system.

 

Given the choice between a turd of a program that drove up costs and reduced quality for all the people who actually work (and pay our own way) and zilch, sometimes "do nothing" is the better choice.  That was certainly the case with Obamacare.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Celsius said:

I understand all of the above, but don't understand this 

 

If America declared a trade war with everyone, how does that benefit them? They should have punished either Canada or mexico, not both at the same time  

 

they can't build factories overnight.

 

can't wait for Yanks to complain about the price of eggs and healthcare 

Not just that, if Canada and Mexico got some backbone they would cut off the oil they ship to the US. The US can't refine its own shale oil and gets a large part of its import (70+%) from those two countries. Also, Canada supplies a large part of northern US electric power. And with 25% tariffs, Mexico might find it worth expanding its world market for its produce.

I forgot, The US gets almost 100% of its natural gas import from Canada

  • Thanks 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, bunnydrops said:

Not just that, if Canada and Mexico got some backbone they would cut off the oil they ship to the US. The US can't refine its own shale oil and gets a large part of its import (70+%) from those two countries. Also, Canada supplies a large part of northern US electric power. And with 25% tariffs, Mexico might find it worth expanding its world market for its produce.

I forgot, The US gets almost 100% of its natural gas import from Canada

 

Seriously where do you guys get those nuggets of wisdom?  CNN or MSDNC? 

 

The US is a net exporter of oil and of natural gas.  We produce more than we consume.  Take Canadian and Mexican oil and gas off the table, and the big suffering would accrue to the Mexicans and the Canadians who would have to build $$ billions in infrastructure (and in Canada's case, decades of permitting) to send their petroleum products to other markets.

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, jas007 said:

Why not just take it at face value?  Why should the USA be supporting Canada? And why should the USA not be concerned with the continued flow of illegals and drugs across the border?  The USA needs nothing from Canada.  And Canada is already in trouble, economically.  So they either change a few policies or perish.  Why wouldn't that be Trump's thinking?

So, using your logic, the USA doesn't need Canadian oil (despite the FACT that it comprises at least 25% of the total US supply) , energy (as many as eight US states depend on Canadian energy to keep the lights on), potash (necessary to fertilize crops, and Canada has the biggest supply), uranium (for those nukes you folks love so much) and other precious metals to thrive.

 

Perhaps you should learn a bit more about how much the USA depends on Canada before you display your obvious ignorance. Oh, and if you think it would be easy to retool to be able to process heavy crude, think again. That would take years, and the midterms would have already happened, with Trump losing power rapidly. Have a nice day, eh. 

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Seriously where do you guys get those nuggets of wisdom?  CNN or MSDNC? 

 

The US is a net exporter of oil and of natural gas.  We produce more than we consume.  Take Canadian and Mexican oil and gas off the table, and the big suffering would accrue to the Mexicans and the Canadians who would have to build $$ billions in infrastructure (and in Canada's case, decades of permitting) to send their petroleum products to other markets.

 

 

 

"You see, the U.S. does produce enough oil to meet its own needs, but it is the wrong type of oil."

"So, we are left in a place where the U.S., despite producing more crude than it needs, is dependent on imports."

 

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/america-produces-enough-oil-to-meet-its-needs-so-why-do-we-import-crude

"The United States became a total petroleum net exporter in 2020


In 2020, the United States became a net exporter of petroleum for the first time since at least 1949.1 In 2022, total petroleum exports were about 9.52 million barrels per day (b/d) and total petroleum imports were about 8.33 million b/d, making the United States an annual net total petroleum exporter for the third year in a row."

And, more than half of US oil imports come from Canada. US crude extractions costs are highest in the world, and US domestic sweet light crude is incompatible with current refinery technology. They need imports for their refineries and source more than half from Canada. Any interruptions in Canada sourced heavy crude could initiate huge price spikes in fuel costs at the pump. Despite producing more oil domestically US imports of Canadian petroleum have increased steadily since the early 80's. US reliance on it cannot be understated.

USoilimports.thumb.jpg.0c3bf97399aa2b729bad835645030128.jpg


https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/imports-and-exports.php

reference

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...